![]() CATEGORIES: BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism |
Figure 2-24. The stepping feet illusion, with the striped background
Even though they're still moving in the same direction, the blocks now appear to be alternately jerking forward, like little stepping feet. Like a lot of illusions, the effect is stronger in your peripheral vision; fix the center of your gaze at the cross off to the side and the stepping feet will be even clearer. How It Works The easiest way to see why the stepping feet occur is to look at the same pattern, but without any colorthe yellow becomes white and the blue becomes black. Michael Bach's animation of stepping feet (http://www.michaelbach.de/ot/mot_feet_lin; Flash) allows you to remove the color with a click of the Color Off button. With no color, there's no illusion: the moving blocks appear like stepping feet even when you look straight at them. When the black (previously blue) block overlaps a black stripe, you can't see its leading edge so it isn't apparent that it's moving. Given no cues, your motion processing centers assume no movement. Then as the black block begins to move over a white stripe, you can suddenly see the leading edge again, and it's moved from where you brain had thought it was. That's when you see the block apparently jump forward and then move normallyat least until it overlaps the black stripe again. The same is true for the white (previously yellow) block over white stripes, only it moves when the black block looks still and vice versa. So that's what the blocks look like in black and white. Losing the movement information of the leading edge over one stripe in two makes the blocks look like stepping feet. And that's what the motion-sensitive and color-insensitive magnocellular pathway sees. The color information is added back in only later, reattached in the visual cortex after the motion has been computed. In the end, you're able to simultaneously see the stepping feet motion via one pathway and the colors via the other.
End Notes 1. Anstis, S. M. (2003). Moving objects appear to slow down at low contrasts. Neural Networks, 16, 933-938. 2. Thiele A., Dobkins, K. R., & Albright, T. D. (2000). Neural correlates of contrast detection at threshold. Neuron, 26, 715-724. See Also · Stuart Anstis's publications online (http://psy.ucsd.edu/~sanstis/SAPub.html). · Anstis discusses the effect of contrast on motion perception (http://psy.ucsd.edu~sanstis/PDFs/YorkChapter.pdf). |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
Hack 30. Understand the Rotating Snakes Illusion
![]() ![]() ![]()
Another source of confusion for our visual system is a constant random drift in the exact focus of our eyes.1 This happens between saccades (see Figure 2-5, for example, in [Hack #15] ). Our muscles are constantly sending little corrective signals to keep our eyes in the same place. These signals never keep the eyes exactly still, producing so-called fixational movements. This is a good thing. If visual input is completely constant (i.e., if your eyes become paralyzed), the neurons in the eye stop responding to the constant input (because that is what they do [Hack #26] ) and everything fades out. Normally your brain uses the structure of the current scene combined with the assumption that small random movements are due to eye movement so as not to get distracted by these slight constant drifts. To actually see these fixational movements, you have to look at something without any structure and without any surrounding frame of reference. In Action We need to get a handle on various principles of vision and motion computation before we can understand the rotating snakes illusion. Fortunately, each step comes with a practical demonstration of the principle. Date: 2015-12-11; view: 2085
|