![]() CATEGORIES: BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism |
Comply with 3 terminate 4 terminateComply with Well- 3 actually 4 specific 5 continually Persistently 7 temporary 8 essential Unit 11 Copyright 2 patent 3 trade mark 4 injunction C 2a 3e 4b 5d Suggested answers Another term for intellectual property rights or rights to Assets which lack physical existence A privilege afforded to third parties to use a Copyrighted work without the consent of the copyright Holder Use of an intellectual property right without Authorisation from the holder of the right Business-method patents. It involves an Internet sales application featuring a One-click ordering solution. Four requirements Landmark cases 2 utility 3 tangible benefit Non-obviousness requirement 5 subject matter Barred from False 2 True 3 False 4 True It has extended patent protection to a large number of Previously unpatentable areas. It involves a data-processing system for managing Mutual funds. On the grounds that it was unpatentable subject Matter. The court reasoned that the software used in a Machine constituted a useful, concrete and tangible Result, warranting patentability. Because it establishes, in contrast to cases preceding It, that business methods are not per se unpatentable Due to their subject matter. Patentability 2 patent 3 unpatentable 4 patent Patentable 6 patented Suggested answer Facts of the case State Street Bank & Trust Co. vs. Signature Financial Group (1998), (known as the 'State Street' case) involved The patentability of a data-processing system for managing Mutual funds. Legal issue in question The legal issue was whether a patented data-processing System fell within two exceptions to patentability - Mathematical algorithms and methods of doing business - and the issued patent was thus invalid. Holdings and reasoning of the courts The lower court held that the software patent involved was Invalid on the grounds that it entailed two exceptions to Patentability. However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the patentability of business Method-related software and rejected both exceptions to Patentability. The court held that since the claims of the Patent-at-issue were directed to a machine programmed With software, and such a machine produced a useful, Concrete and tangible result, the software constituted Patentable subject matter. General legal significance of the case As a result of the ruling, business-method software may Now be patented. C 2G D 2e 3a 4c 5b C 2a 3d 4b Function Examples Establishing a Sequence As a next step, Finally, First of all, Secondly, To begin with, To conclude Expanding on Besides, In addition, Furthermore, In contrast, On the other hand, However, Alternatively Formerly, Previously, Traditionally, As a consequence, Therefore, Thus, Conclusion or Accordingly, Consequently, As a result Inference through Reasoning Giving an example Summarising In fact, In particular, Of course, Clearly, Notably, Ultimately For example, For instance, Specifically In short, Summing up, In other Words, Briefly Answer key E Date: 2015-12-11; view: 776
|