The opinions of lawyers on the new arbitration scheme.The irony of the new arbitration scheme lies in the fact
That employment tribunals were themselves originally
intended to be an 'easily accessible, informal, speedy and
inexpensive' alternative to the ordinary courts for dealing
With individual employment disputes.
True 2 True 3 False 4 True 5 False 6 False
E 2 d 3 a 4 c 5 b
C 2f 3b 4d 5a 6e
To hear a case
To waive rights
To plead a case
To apply a law
To appeal a case, an award
To challenge a case, an award, a law
31 Factual errors in memo:
1 Speed: The new arbitration procedure usually only
Takes half a day.
2 Appeals: While the decisions of an employment
Tribunal can be appealed, challenging the award of the
New arbitration scheme is much more difficult - the
arbitrator's decision is considered binding.
The new arbitration scheme only deals with unfair
Dismissal cases.
B
The following summary presents a selection of key
Features of both the new arbitration scheme and the
Existing employment tribunal process.
Unlike, In contrast to, Both... and...
This is clearly advantageous, A further advantage of
Confidentiality is ..., this can be regarded as a
Significant advantage
Suggested answer
Dear Mr Mason
In your email of 9 April, you asked for information
Concerning the new arbitration procedure. You specifically
Requested my judgment concerning the advantages and
Disadvantages of arbitration from the point of view of an
Employer. I will first explain some of the features of the
Existing employment tribunal process and then look at the
New arbitration scheme.
Employment tribunals hear the full range of employmentrelated
Disputes. They are public hearings held in front of
A panel of three people. The fact that they are public can
Be a disadvantage for employers, since well-publicised
Employee disputes can lead to unwanted bad publicity. As
A result, there is also the drawback of a greater tendency
To reach out-of-court settlements which are favourable to
Employees. A further disadvantage of employment
Tribunals is the fact that they typically take longer than the
New arbitration process. However, employment tribunals
Have the important advantage that decisions reached by
Them can be appealed.
In contrast, the new arbitration procedure only deals with
Unfair dismissal cases. The proceedings are held in a
Private setting, such as a hotel. Another difference is the
Relative speed of the proceedings, which typically last only
A half a day. This is clearly advantageous for an employer,
As it would save a great deal of time and money. However,
The new arbitration scheme does have a significant
drawback: the decisions reached by the arbitrators are
Considered binding, and so appealing or challenging a
Decision is very difficult.
On balance, I would say that the new arbitration scheme
Is attractive from the point of view of an employer, and I
Recommend that you consider making use of this new
Process to deal with unfair dismissal disputes.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like
Date: 2015-12-11; view: 807
|