![]() CATEGORIES: BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism |
Concluded between my client and the defendant, the softwareDesign company Glaptech, unambiguouslv stipulates that the defendant agrees to create a computer program enabling ill! Customers to book a ferry passage online. Specifically, the contract express Iv reads that the program must work for "ill! customers using modern home computers." We heard today, In the testimony of a recognized computer expert, that the concept of "modern home computers" can reasonablv be Construed to include Apple Macintosh computers. Therefore We must conclude that the creation of a program which does Not function on this verv tvpe of computer system constitutes A clear breach of the contract concluded between my client And the defendant. C 2 a 3 b Suggested answers The court gave weight to the evidence provided by the Expert witness. The court's determination that the withholding of consent Was unreasonable was supported by the evidence. In reaching its decision, the court drew inferences of fact From the evidence submitted. The text is about a new law in England, Wales and Northern Ireland which came into force in 2000 and which Gives third parties to a contract additional rights. C 2 d 3 b 4 e 5 a The act applies to contracts governed by English law or The law of Northern Ireland entered into beginning May As well as to each English law contract Entered into beginning November 11, 1999, which Expressly provides for its application. A person that is not a party to a contract will be Permitted to enforce its terms if the contract expressly Provides that the non-party may do so, or if one or More terms of the contract purport to confer a benefit On the non-party, unless on a proper construction of The contract, it appears that the parties did not intend The term to be enforceable by the non-party. The advice is given that contract drafters should Consider whether any third party has been given rights Under a contract. The parties may agree in the contract To exclude the application of the statute to prevent one Or more of the parties from being exposed to Unexpected claims by third parties who were not Intended to be beneficiaries of the contract. D 2 c 3 a 4 e 5 b Language Focus Intensity 3 enlist 4 propose 5 appeal Contrary; shall; to 2 withhold; thereof; conditions Have; approval 4 to; entity To 3 under 4 from 5 to 6 against 7 to S upon To; under; to 2 to; to; under 3 to; on Of; against 5 2 lessor/lessee, a 3 mortgagor/mortgagee, c 4 transferor/transferee, b Un 8 A5 b6 c4 dl e7 f3 g2 C2a3d4b Suggested answers 1 This means 'interpreted or understood to be discriminatory' . This refers to adjustments which are fitting and Appropriate, and not excessively costly. This refers to damages awarded for feelings of Disappointment, frustration, grief, humiliation, etc. arising Out of the manner, and possibly the fact, of dismissal. C 2d 3a 4e 5b Both a case bonanza and a boom in work mean an Extremely large amount of cases to work on. One directive would outlaw discrimination on the basis of Age and religion. The second deals with discrimination based on race and Date: 2015-12-11; view: 882
|