Anaphylaxis refers to a severe allergic reaction in which prominent dermal and systemic signs and symptoms manifest. The full-blown syndrome includes urticaria (hives) and/or angioedema with hypotension and bronchospasm. The classic form, described in 1902, involves prior sensitization to an allergen with later re-exposure, producing symptoms via an immunologic mechanism. An anaphylactoid reaction produces a very similar clinical syndrome but is not immune-mediated. Treatment for both conditions is similar, and this article uses the term anaphylaxis to refer to both conditions unless otherwise specified.
Pathophysiology:Rapid onset of increased secretion from mucous membranes, increased bronchial smooth muscle tone, decreased vascular smooth muscle tone, and increased capillary permeability occur after exposure to an inciting substance. These effects are produced by the release of mediators, which include histamine, leukotriene C4, prostaglandin D2, and tryptase.
In the classic form, mediator release occurs when the antigen (allergen) binds to antigen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) attached to previously sensitized basophils and mast cells. The mediators are released almost immediately when the antigen binds. In an anaphylactoid reaction, exposure to an inciting substance causes direct release of mediators, a process that is not mediated by IgE. Increased mucous secretion and increased bronchial smooth muscle tone, as well as airway edema, contribute to the respiratory symptoms observed in anaphylaxis. Cardiovascular effects result from decreased vascular tone and capillary leakage. Histamine release in skin causes urticarial skin lesions.
The most common inciting agents in anaphylaxis are parenteral antibiotics (especially penicillins), IV contrast materials, Hymenoptera stings, and certain foods (most notably, peanuts). Oral medications and many other types of exposures also have been implicated. Anaphylaxis also may be idiopathic.
History:
Anaphylactic reactions almost always involve the skin or mucous membranes. More than 90% of patients have some combination of urticaria, erythema, pruritus, or angioedema.
The upper respiratory tract commonly is involved, with complaints of nasal congestion, sneezing, or coryza. Cough, hoarseness, or a sensation of tightness in the throat may presage significant airway obstruction.
Eyes may itch and tearing may be noted. Conjunctival injection may occur.
Dyspnea is present when patients have bronchospasm or upper airway edema. Hypoxia and hypotension may cause weakness, dizziness, or syncope. Chest pain may occur due to bronchospasm or myocardial ischemia (secondary to hypotension and hypoxia).
GI symptoms of cramplike abdominal pain with nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea also occur but are less common, except in the case of food allergy.
In a classic case of anaphylaxis, the patient or a bystander provides a history of possible exposures that may have caused the rapid onset of skin and other manifestations. This history often is partial; exposure may not be recalled, or it may not be considered significant by the patient or physician. For example, when queried about medications, a patient may not mention over-the-counter (OTC) products. The clinician may not realize that, while reactions are usually rapid in onset, they also may be delayed.
Physical:
General
Physical examination of patients with anaphylaxis depends on affected organ systems and severity of attack. Vital signs may be normal or significantly disordered with tachypnea, tachycardia, and/or hypotension.
Place emphasis on determining the patient's respiratory and cardiovascular status.
Frank cardiovascular collapse or respiratory arrest may occur in severe cases. Anxiety is common unless hypotension or hypoxia causes obtundation. Shock may occur without prominent skin manifestations or history of exposure; therefore, anaphylaxis is part of the differential diagnosis for patients who present with shock and no obvious cause.
General appearance and vital signs vary according to severity of attack and affected organ system(s). Patients commonly are restless due to severe pruritus from urticaria. Anxiety, tremor, and a sensation of cold may result from compensatory endogenous catecholamine release. Severe air hunger may occur when the respiratory tract is involved. If hypoperfusion or hypoxia occurs, the patient may exhibit a depressed level of consciousness or may be agitated and/or combative. Tachycardia usually is present, but bradycardia may occur in very severe reactions.
Skin
The classic skin manifestation is urticaria (ie, hives). Lesions are red and raised, and they sometimes have central blanching. Intense pruritus occurs with the lesions. Lesion borders usually are irregular and sizes vary markedly. Only a few small or large lesions may become confluent, forming giant urticaria. At times, the entire dermis is involved with diffuse erythema and edema. Hives can occur anywhere on the skin.
In a local reaction, lesions occur near the site of a cutaneous exposure (eg, insect bite). The involved area is erythematous, edematous, and pruritic. If only local skin reaction (as opposed to generalized urticaria) is present, systemic manifestations (eg, respiratory distress) are less likely. Local reactions, even if severe, are not predictive of systemic anaphylaxis on re-exposure.
Lesions typical of angioedema also may manifest in anaphylaxis. The lesions involve mucosal surfaces and deeper skin layers. Angioedema usually is nonpruritic and associated lesions are nonpitting. Lesions most often appear on the lips, palms, soles, and genitalia.
Pulmonary
Upper airway compromise may occur when the tongue or oropharynx is involved. When the upper airway is involved, stridor may be noted. The patient may have a hoarse or quiet voice and may lose speaking ability as the edema progresses. Complete airway obstruction is the most common cause of death in anaphylaxis.
Wheezing is common when patients have lower airway compromise due to bronchospasm or mucosal edema.
In angioedema, due to ACE inhibitors, marked edema of the tongue and lips may obstruct the airway.
Cardiovascular
Cardiovascular examination is normal in mild cases. In more severe cases, compensatory tachycardia occurs due to loss of vascular tone.
Intravascular volume depletion may take place as a consequence of capillary leakage. These mechanisms also lead to development of hypotension.
Relative bradycardia has been reported.
Causes:
A wide variety of substances can cause anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis also may be idiopathic.
In the classic form of anaphylaxis, a foreign protein is the inciting agent (eg, antigen). On initial exposure, the antigen elicits generation of an IgE antibody. The antibody residue binds to mast cells and basophils. On re-exposure, the antigen binds to the antibody, and the receptors are activated. Clinical manifestations result from release of immune response mediators such as histamine, leukotrienes, tryptase, and prostaglandins. The same mechanism occurs when a nonimmunogenic foreign substance binds as a so-called hapten to a native carrier protein, creating an immunogenic molecule. Factors influencing severity of a reaction include degree of host sensitivity and dose, route, and rate of administration of the offending agent.
Parenteral exposures tend to result in faster and more severe reactions. Most severe reactions occur soon after exposure. The faster a reaction develops, the more severe it is likely to be. While most reactions occur within hours, symptoms may not occur for as long as 3-4 days after exposure.
Drugs
Penicillin and cephalosporin antibiotics are the most commonly reported medical agents in anaphylaxis. This prevalence is a function of the immunogenicity and overuse of these agents. Because of their molecular and immunologic similarity, cross-sensitivity may exist. Reports often assert that 10% of patients allergic to a penicillin antibiotic are allergic to cephalosporins. A recent report suggests that actual incidence of cross-reactivity is lower (perhaps 1%), with most reactions considered mild. A more recent review indicated that patients with a history of allergy to penicillin seem to have a higher risk (by a factor of about 3) of subsequent reaction to any drug and that the risk of an allergic reaction to cephalosporins in patients with a history of penicillin allergy may be up to 8 times as high as the risk in those with no history of penicillin allergy (ie, at least part of the observed "cross reactivity" may represent a general state of immune hyperresponsiveness, rather than true cross-reactivity).
Reactions tend to be more severe and rapid in onset when the antibiotic is administered parenterally.
Anaphylaxis may occur in a patient with no prior history of drug exposure.
History of penicillin or cephalosporin allergy often is unreliable and is not predictive of future reactions. Up to 85% of patients reporting an allergic reaction to penicillin do not react on subsequent exposure. When a drug in either class is the drug of choice for a patient with a life-threatening emergency, a number of options exist. When the history is indefinite, the drug may be administered under close observation; however, when possible, obtain the patient's informed consent. Immediate treatment measures for anaphylaxis should be available. Alternatively, when the history is more convincing, a desensitization or prophylactic pretreatment protocol may be instituted or another agent selected.
Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) commonly are implicated in allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. Bronchospasm is common in patients with reactive airway disease and nasal polyps. Cross-reactivity may occur between the various NSAIDs.
Intravenous radiocontrast media
IV administered radiocontrast media causes an anaphylactoid reaction that is clinically identical to true anaphylaxis and is treated in the same way. The reaction is not related to prior exposure. Shellfish or "iodine allergy" is not a contraindication to use of IV contrast and does not mandate a pretreatment regimen. As with any "allergic" patient, give consideration to use of low molecular weight (LMW) contrast.
The term iodine allergy is a misnomer. Iodine is an essential trace element present throughout the body. No one is allergic to iodine. Patients who report iodine allergy usually have had either a prior contrast reaction or a shellfish allergy. Manage these patients as indicated earlier.
Approximately 1-3% of patients who receive hyperosmolar IV contrast experience a reaction. Use of LMW contrast decreases incidence of reactions to approximately 0.5%. Personnel, medications, and equipment needed for treatment of allergic reactions always should be available when these agents are administered. Obtain consent before administration.
Reactions to radiocontrast usually are mild (most commonly urticarial), with only rare fatalities reported. Risk of a fatal reaction has been estimated at 0.9 cases per 100,000 exposures.
Mucosal exposure (eg, GI, genitourinary [GU]) to radiocontrast agents has not been reported to cause anaphylaxis; therefore, a history of prior reaction is not a contraindication to GI or GU use of these agents.
Pretreatment with antihistamines or corticosteroids and use of LMW agents lead to lower rates of anaphylactoid reactions to IV contrast. Consider these measures for patients who have prior history of reaction, since rate of recurrence is estimated at 17-60%. Patients who are atopic and/or asthmatic also are at increased risk of reaction. In addition, allergic reaction is more difficult to treat in those taking beta-blockers.
Hymenoptera stings
Hymenoptera stings are a common cause of allergic reaction and anaphylaxis. An uncertain but enormous number of exposures occur; accurate reaction rates are difficult to estimate. In the United States, Hymenoptera envenomations result in fewer than 100 reported deaths per year.
Local reaction and urticaria without other manifestations of anaphylaxis are much more common than full-blown anaphylaxis. Generalized urticaria is a risk factor for subsequent anaphylaxis; but a local reaction, even if severe, is not a risk factor for anaphylaxis.
Caution patients treated and released from the ED after an episode of anaphylaxis or generalized urticaria from Hymenoptera envenomation to avoid future exposure when possible. Consider referral to an allergist for desensitization, particularly when further exposure is likely. Additionally, consider prescribing a treatment kit with an epinephrine auto-injector and oral antihistamine. Both are effective measures in preventing or ameliorating future reactions.
Allergies
Food allergy is common. Symptoms usually are mild and limited to the GI tract, but full-blown anaphylaxis can occur. Fatalities are rare compared to number of exposures; however, the number of exposures is so high that foods may be the commonest cause of anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis due to foods may be an underrecognized cause of sudden death and an unappreciated cause of diagnosed anaphylaxis. Commonly implicated foods include nuts (especially peanuts), legumes, fish and shellfish, milk, and eggs.
Latex allergy is an increasingly recognized problem in medical settings, where use of gloves and other latex products is ubiquitous. Most reactions are cutaneous or involve the mucous membranes. Anaphylactic reactions occur and have been reported with seemingly benign procedures (eg, Foley catheter insertion, intraperitoneal exposure to gloves during surgery).
Lab Studies:
The diagnosis of anaphylaxis is clinical and does not rely on laboratory testing. When typical symptoms are noted in association with a likely exposure, diagnosis is virtually certain. Ancillary testing may help assess severity of reaction, although this is primarily a clinical judgment. When unclear, ancillary testing may help establish the diagnosis.
The only potentially useful test at the time of reaction is measurement of serum mast cell tryptase. Tryptase is released from mast cells in both anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions. Levels are usually raised in severe reactions. Mast cell tryptase is raised transiently with blood levels reaching a peak approximately an hour after reaction onset.
Tryptase levels may aid in later diagnosis and treatment.
Consider the test in cases for which diagnosis of anaphylaxis is uncertain.
The utility of this test awaits full evaluation.
Cardiac monitoring in patients with severe reactions and in those with underlying cardiovascular disease is important, particularly when adrenergic agonists are used in treatment. Pulse oximetry also is useful.
Imaging Studies:
Imaging studies are not generally useful in the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis, although they may be used as diagnostic aids when diagnosis is unclear.
Other Tests:
Sensitivity testing
Testing for sensitivity to penicillin antibiotics may be useful when a penicillin or cephalosporin antibiotic is the drug of choice for a serious infection in a patient who has a history of severe allergic reaction. Obtain informed consent, and ensure that resuscitative equipment is immediately available. Protocols for acute testing for allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin antibiotics involve administration of increasing IV doses of the chosen antibiotic, while observing the patient for pruritus, flushing, urticaria, dyspnea, hypotension, or other manifestations of anaphylaxis. If no manifestations are observed, a full dose of the antibiotic may be administered safely.
A suggested protocol for IV testing begins with 0.001 mg of the chosen drug. At 10-min intervals, incrementally increase the dose (eg, 0.001 mg, 0.005 mg, 0.01 mg, 0.05 mg, 0.1 g, 0.5 mg, 1 mg, 10 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, full dose), while observing the patient. Many other protocols exist. In most circumstances, perform desensitization on an inpatient basis. If the necessary resources are available, desensitization may be performed in the ED.
Procedures:
Intravenous contrast reaction prevention
Patients with a history of severe reactions to IV contrast material may require use of contrast in an urgent or emergency situation. Alternatives (eg, spiral CT scan for ureteral stone, Doppler ultrasound for deep venous thrombosis [DVT]) should be considered but are not always feasible. In these circumstances, a prophylactic regimen of corticosteroids and antihistamines may be used. The precise efficacy of these regimens is difficult to evaluate, but they generally are considered effective. One author states that the recurrence rate for patients with a previous reaction was reduced from 17-60% to 9% when conventional contrast material was used; the rate was reduced to less than 1% when low osmolality material was employed after a pretreatment regimen.
The use of H2 blockers has not been shown to decrease the risk of reaction to IV contrast. One study suggests H2 blockers actually appear to increase the risk.
A widely quoted protocol for prevention of reactions to IV contrast suggests the following:
Use low osmolality contrast.
Administer hydrocortisone (200 mg IV); wait 2 hours if clinically appropriate.
Administer diphenhydramine (50 mg IM) immediately before the procedure.
Desensitization regimens
Desensitization regimens for penicillin and cephalosporin antibiotic allergy have been shown effective. Because these regimens are lengthy (approximately 6 h), they have limited applicability to the ED. When patients wait for long periods in the ED or in an observation unit, consider desensitization regimens.
A typical desensitization regimen involves administering the antibiotic of choice in an initial dose of 0.01 mg. While observing the patient, double the dose every 10-15 minutes until a full dose has been administered.
Desensitization regimens do not protect against non–IgE-mediated reactions that may be severe or even life threatening (eg, Stevens-Johnson syndrome).
While theoretically attractive, premedication regimens have not been clinically shown to decrease incidence or severity of IgE-mediated allergic reactions to antibiotics
Prehospital Care:
Prehospital patients with symptoms of severe anaphylaxis should first receive standard interventions. Interventions include high-flow oxygen, cardiac monitoring, and IV access. These measures are appropriate for an asymptomatic patient who has a history of serious reaction and has been re-exposed to the inciting agent. Additional treatment depends upon the condition of the patient and the severity of the reaction. Measures beyond basic life support (BLS) are not necessary for patients with purely local reactions.
Immediately assess airway patency due to the potential for compromise secondary to edema or bronchospasm. Active airway intervention may be difficult due to laryngeal or oropharyngeal edema. In this circumstance, it may be preferable to defer intubation attempts, and instead ventilate with a bag/valve/mask apparatus while awaiting medications to take effect. In extreme circumstances, cricothyrotomy or catheter jet ventilation may be lifesaving. Inhaled beta-agonists are used to counteract bronchospasm and should be administered to patients who are wheezing.
The IV line should be of large caliber due to the potential requirement for large-volume IV fluid resuscitation. Isotonic crystalloid solutions (ie, normal saline, Ringer lactate) are preferred. A keep vein open (KVO) rate is appropriate for patients with stable vital signs and only cutaneous manifestations. If hypotension or tachycardia is present, administer a fluid bolus of 20 mg/kg for children and 1 L for adults. Further fluid therapy depends on patient response. Large volumes may be required in the profoundly hypotensive patient.
Administer epinephrine to patients with systemic manifestations of anaphylaxis. With mild cutaneous reactions, an antihistamine alone may be sufficient, thus the potential adverse effects of epinephrine can be avoided. Patients on beta-blocker medications may not respond to epinephrine. In these cases, glucagon may be useful. The Medication section describes dosage, routes of administration, and contraindications for medications discussed in this section. Antihistamines (eg, H1 blockers), such as diphenhydramine (Benadryl) are important and should be administered for all patients with anaphylaxis or generalized urticaria.
Corticosteroids are used in anaphylaxis primarily to decrease the incidence and severity of delayed or biphasic reactions. Corticosteroids may not influence the acute course of the disease; therefore, they have a lower priority than epinephrine and antihistamines.
Emergency Department Care:
ED care begins with standard monitoring and treatment, including oxygen, cardiac monitoring, and a large-bore IV with isotonic crystalloid solution. Further intervention depends on severity of reaction and affected organ system(s).
Rapidly assess airway patency in patients with systemic signs or symptoms. If required, intubation may be difficult to achieve because of upper airway or facial edema. Standard rapid sequence induction (RSI) techniques can be used but may cause loss of the airway in a patient whose airway anatomy is altered by edema. Epinephrine may rapidly reverse airway compromise, and bag/valve/mask ventilation may be effective in the interim when intubation is not possible. Surgical airway intervention using standard cricothyrotomy is an option when orotracheal intubation or bag/valve/mask ventilation is not effective.
Wheezing or stridor indicates bronchospasm or mucosal edema. Treatment with epinephrine and inhaled beta-agonists is effective for these indications.
Recommendations to treat refractory bronchospasm with corticosteroids have been made because of their effectiveness in reactive airway disease. As in asthma therapy, onset of action is delayed for several hours. Aminophylline also has been recommended for bronchospasm in anaphylaxis and may be more rapidly effective than corticosteroids.
Hypotension in anaphylaxis usually is due to vasodilatation and capillary fluid leakage. Epinephrine is the primary pharmacologic treatment for these findings. H1-blocking antihistamines also may have a role in reversing hypotension. Some authors also recommend H2-blocking agents. Large volume fluid resuscitation with isotonic crystalloid often is needed to support the circulation in patients with cardiovascular manifestations of anaphylaxis.
Refractory hypotension first should be treated with large volumes of crystalloid and repeated doses of epinephrine or a continuous epinephrine infusion. If this is not effective, other pressors with alpha-adrenergic activity, such as levarterenol (Levophed) or dopamine, may be considered. Cases of effective use of military antishock trousers (MAST) for refractory hypotension have been reported.
Mediators of anaphylaxis are not considered to have direct myocardial toxicity. In patients with preexisting heart disease, ischemic myocardial dysfunction may occur due to hypotension and hypoxia. Epinephrine still may be necessary in patients with severe anaphylaxis, but remember the potential for exacerbating ischemia. If pulmonary congestion or evidence of cardiac ischemia is present, fluid resuscitation should be approached more cautiously.
Patients taking beta-blockers may be resistant to the effects of epinephrine. Larger than usual doses may be needed. Glucagon may be effective in this circumstance, because it increases intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels by a mechanism that does not depend upon beta-receptors.
Cutaneous effects of anaphylaxis are uncomfortable but not life threatening. Patients often respond promptly to epinephrine and H1 antihistamines. Some authors state that corticosteroids help prevent recurrence of symptoms (both cutaneous and systemic) that may occur 6-8 hours after successful treatment (so-called biphasic reaction). H2 blockers may have an added effect.
GI symptoms in anaphylaxis respond to H1 antihistamines and epinephrine.
Consultations:
Acute manifestations of anaphylaxis usually respond to ED treatment. In refractory cases, consult with an allergist, cardiologist, pulmonologist, or other intensivist.
Consultation with an allergist (when available) is appropriate when desensitization to an antibiotic is contemplated.
When a patient at high risk for contrast reaction is under consideration for a contrast study, consultation with the radiologist regarding pretreatment and choice of contrast agent is appropriate.
Refer patients who are treated and released from the ED after an episode of anaphylaxis or generalized urticaria to their primary care physician or to an allergist for follow-up. At that time, consideration can be given to skin testing and possible desensitization.