Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






II. Comment on the choice of words in the headline.

III. Say if you agree with the described student types. That other types would you single out? Do you belong to any of them?

Pay up! Pay up! And Play the Game!

 

Getting a decent education for your child requires cunning as well as money

Glass war is never far away in British education. It’s sad but true that most of the best schools are fee-paying ones, which help their pupils win the excellent exam grades that lead on to a state-subsidised place at top universities.

The government wants to change that: it bullies top universities to take more state-school pupils, who are more likely to be from poor backgrounds. This week it issued tough new benchmarks for the numbers of state-school pupils that universities “ought” to take. The result is pressure «to admit as many state-school pupils, and as few fee-paying ones, as possible», says Alan Smithers of the (privately financed) University of Buckingham.

Distorting the system like this increases the chance that people will try to cheat it. Canny middle-class parents are now wondering if it’s worth buying the best education they can afford for their children; for fear that they will be stigmatized when it comes to university entrance.

The game is to get the maximum quality of education for the minimum outlay, while ensuring that your child is not fingered as a class enemy when it comes to university entrance. How you manage this (see box) depends on money, religious belief and mobility.

If you have lots of cash, a bright child and don’t want too much hassle, the best option is to send your offspring to an independent school from the start. It will be costly: £ 5, 000- 10, 000 ($9, 000- 18, 000) a year at the primary stage, £ 6, 000-20, 000 for secondary school, depending on quality, location, and whether it is a day or a boarding school. But when your child is 16, you move him to the state sector for two years. The government’s bean counters will treat him as a state-school product. Applications to universities such as Cambridge, however, will list all his schools, showing what a well-trained chap he is. That should maximize his chances.

To play safe, you can also move house to somewhere grotty. Universities are paid extra for taking students from poor districts. You can always move back to a more salubrious area as soon as your child’s application has been accepted.

If that’s too expensive or disruptive, there are plenty of other options. The simplest is to move to the catchment area for a good state primary school. You can do the same thing later on, to get into a good (usually meaning solidity middle-class) state comprehensive. In London, house prices may be up to 20% higher in the right catchment area – but you can regard that as an investment: sell the house once your child is safely enrolled, and you’ll be unlikely to lose money on the deal. Or you can rent.

Many of the best state schools are church-run. Your chances of getting in are greatly strengthened if you can have a letter from your priest, saying that you attend Sunday worship regularly. The best example of this is the prime minister: his children go to excellent, heavily over-subscribed, Roman Catholic state schools. Luckily for parents with wobbly faith (or a cynical lack of it) such schools are not longer allowed to interview.



The third option is to try for a place at a selective state school. This may mean moving to Kent or Buckinghamshire, two solidly Conservative countries that have preserved the 11+results, charges only £6, 300 a year. Given what you save on schools fees later, that’s a bargain.

Another option is private tuition, used by one in four parents according to a recent survey. It can be expensive : £30 a session, say, five times a week. But it has a big advantage: invisibility. Your child can arrive at university expertly tutored, but with impeccably plebeian credentials (as with the Blairs: they hire tutors from Westminster, London’s brainiest private school).

The government is constantly trying to change the rules to prevent such game playing. One threat is to penalise university applications on their parents’ educational background as well as their own. Getting round that will be tricky: “ Sophie, 17, seeks kind, preferably working-class, foster parents to see her through university admission and help her shed the disadvantages of her middle-class origins. No graduates need apply.”


 

 

How to play the school system

 

Start

 

Find 30-60k for Find religious credentials for admission to Find cash for up to 20% premium

Private school good Anglican or Roman Catholic primary on housing near good state primary

 

Find up to 10k for private Find cash for up to 20% premium

Tutoring for 11+ exam on housing near good comprehensive

Find 30-100k for private

Secondary school to 16 Get child into good religious secondary

school, following Blair’s example

 

Move to area with selective secondary

schools (e.g. Buckinghamshire or Kent)

 

Adopt class war camouflage: move to

Area with working-class postcode; Find up to 10k for private

Put child in state school for 6th form tutoring for A-levels if necessary

 

 

Top university

Jane Stowe

/The Economist, October 9 , 2004/

Set Work


Date: 2016-03-03; view: 799


<== previous page | next page ==>
V. Render the article into English. | The Homework Ate My Family
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2024 year. Copyright infringement or personal data (0.006 sec.)