Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






HERE IT IS: DING DING DING

UPDATE: ALL PHOTO ANOMALIES BELOW ARE FULLY EXPLAINED BY THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT MURDERING THESE PEOPLE AND THEN SETTING UP THE GRISLY BLOODY SCENE. THIS IS PROVEN, THEY TOTALLY SCREWED THE POOCH.


Photo of the Bataclan staged massacre in Paris
(Click for relatively high-res version).

They released a photo of the bataclan, with dead bodies, blood, the whole 9 yards. But there are serious problems with it.

1. No EMT response. If this setup was not wanted by the government, EMT's would be all over it, dragging even known dead bodies to the hospital to be PROVEN DEAD.

2. No police response. If this was a scene that was not set up by the government, police would be ALL OVER IT.

3. Five people standing on the balcony, 1 photographer, and one guy on the ground floor. NOT A SINGLE ONE out with the bodies.

HERE IS A HUGE ONE: CONFIRMED: 4. The original picture in the highest resolution was released as a PNG screen capture. That exact photo is to the left here, totally un modified If you wanted to avoid all chances of anyone doing a real photo analysis to dig up evidence, a screen capture of a photo would do that job perfectly because a screen capture has so little to work with, it consists only of the bits it takes to display an image, there are no sub bits in a screen capture that can be pulled forward and analyzed. A REAL EVIDENCE PHOTO WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN RELEASED AS A .PNG SCREEN CAPTURE.

The Bataclan theater has many options for floor and seating arrangements, but in all past photos from before this "shooting", they try to at least maintain the honor of the theater by not having an event done on bare concrete. Why is the concrete in this photo bare? OBVIOUSLY TO AVOID MESSING UP A PREMIUM FLOOR COVERING STAGING THIS SHOT.

THIS PHOTO, WHICH IS THE ONLY PHOTO, IN ITS HIGHEST RESOLUTION IS STILL SUPER LOW RESOLUTION, WHICH WILL PREVENT PEOPLE FROM PICKING IT APART. It was not bad enough for them to release a screen capture, but even for a screen capture this is garbage. It looks "clear" until you try to do anything with it, like look for bullet holes in the theater. The resolution of the photo is not adequate to reveal a single one, IF any exist at all.

UPDATE: VIDEO OF BEGINNING OF SHOOTING RELEASED BY MSM, AS I REQUESTED!

HERE IT IS

Or here:

Local version

And a few questions:

1. Why is there no crowd reaction AT ALL?

2. If the drummer got shot and fell down, as some are saying, why was he interviewed later with no gunshot wounds?

3. YEP - HOW DID THE SHOOTERS MISS THE BAND, KILLING ONLY MEMBERS OF THE CREW?

[Ed note: we have also noticed that the sound quality of the gun shots sound like it was recorded in a studio. Because there is no ambiance present in those sounds, unlike you can clearly notice the ambiance in the sounds of the band. So, even, if the camera was located within inches of a gun, and was directly pointed at it, which it was not, since we do not see any gun barrel, we would never achieve such a studio quality of the gun shots if they were recorded in any real hall, or even in a room, which is not perfectly "dead" ("dead room" means essentially a recording studio with no reverberation (ambiance), present in any real acoustical space).



Secondly, if these were the actual sounds of a Kalashnikov, which needs to be analyzed by the sound engineers and/or experts, what seems to be strange is that the shots are of a single shot kind, even though they were made in a relatively rapid succession But they don't sound like bursts of a machine gun fire. If we assume that they were shooting the single shots in order to precisely target some individuals, then the shots are in too rapid of a succession for a pointed shooting, and if they are the bursts of a typical machine gun fire, then how come we hear the single shot sounds?

Well, if you listen to the sound several times, you might notice that there were two separate guns shooting, one at some distance from the camera, doing the most of shooting, and the second one - closer to a camera, which fired only two separate shots, while the first one kept shooting at a relatively rapid rate.

But they still sound like they were recorded in a relatively small room and not a hall of comparable size, even though the the forensic enactment of the scene, locating the guns in the same locations as we have on this recording and doing a sound recording of the same exact guns with comparable condenser mikes, or from the same exact camera, would probably produce the much more definitive conclusions.

Interestingly enough, the band sound does sound like it was recorded in a hall, since you do hear the ambiance. But there is audible difference between the sound of a band and gun shots. So...

But, the sounds somehow just do not sound quite realistic, if it was really recorded in a hall of comparable size.

Thirdly, in a totally unlighted hall, why would one shoot the single shots if he can not see the targets? It simply does not make any sense.]

ANSWERS:

1. There was no crowd reaction because the sound of the gunshots was dubbed in afterward. There were no gunshots at the concert, as proven by no crowd reaction, and NO, A SPEAKER CANNOT OUT PERFORM THE SOUND OF AN AK-47, NO MATTER HOW LOUD ONE IS, THEY JUST DO NOT GO THAT LOUD. So EVERYONE in the audience should have jumped out of their shoes if a real gun got fired. Let me explain this -

Many people have been out in the back country when people have been doing target practice. And the gunshots can be heard CLEARLY, miles away. Ok, if so, when have you heard any event and speakers like that, from miles away? I remember the stories of an Ozzie Osbourne concert that could be heard from miles away, but it took place in an open air stadium with 50,000 people and laws were written afterward saying a concert cannot be that loud, because many people got their hearing permanently damaged from that one event, that was legendary loud. This band was not in a large stadium and was not playing to 50,000 people, the gunshots should have been deafening and scared the crap out of everyone.

2. The drummer, who was on TV later with no injuries whatsoever "fell down" most likely because it was just part of the normal stage act. His sticks did not go flying and instead got placed in the front of the drum set where they belonged. If there was really something going on, the drum sticks would have flown. The guitarist that exited to the left of the screen did so in a way that would be part of a normal act, performers do not stand still because that gets boring, they have to do a show.

My conclusion: They needed to produce a fake video of this concert getting shot up "WHEN THE SHOOTING HAPPENED" because people were asking for it. So they went over whatever video of the concert there was, waited for a part of the show where they could say, yeah, this part of the show looks like people might believe something happened, and then they dubbed the gunshot audio in. But all aspects were not there, the lack of crowd reaction in any form at all proves this is not video of a real shooting.

3. The shooters missed the band, and only killed members of the crew, BECAUSE THE BAND HAS TO DO MORE SHOWS IN THE FUTURE, AND NO FANS ANYWHERE KNOW ANYONE WHO IS PART OF THE CREW, those people can be vanished and no one will be the wiser. If a band member was actually shot, the show could not go on. Therefore that was not part of the script.

There is a chance the band was totally in on this from the beginning and acted on cue as well, and that all parts of the sound track other than the gunshots were real. But one thing is certain, there were no gunshots AT ALL, the lack of crowd reaction proves it.

The video blows the lid off EVERYTHING, because IT PROVES PEOPLE HAD THEIR CAMERAS OUT RECORDING THIS LIVE. THERE WAS NOT ONLY ONE PERSON SHOOTING VIDEO, AS I SAID, THERE SHOULD BE OVER 50 UNIQUE VIDEOS AVAILABLE AT A MINIMUM, AND REALISTICALLY THERE COULD BE OVER 100, WITH AT LEAST 10 RIGHT BY THE SHOOTERS. NO ONE WILL TURN THEIR VIDEO CAMERA OFF, WHICH TAKES A CONSCIOUS EFFORT, IF THEY ARE BEING SHOT AT. THERE SHOULD BE FULL LENGTH VIDEOS FROM DROPPED CELL PHONES THAT HAVE NOTHING BUT GUYS TALKING ARABIC AND SHOOTING FOR 15 MINUTES STRAIGHT, AND OTHER CELL VIDEOS WHERE THE PHONES DID NOT GET DROPPED BUT AT LEAST GOT PUT IN POCKETS, AND SOME WHERE PEOPLE KEPT THEIR COOL AND FILMED IT ALL. WHERE ARE THEY?

SORRY, A 20 SECOND CLIP WITH A NOT SHOT DRUMMER DOING AN ACT AND NO CROWD REACTION JUST DOES NOT CUT IT. IF THE DRUMMER COULD HEAR IT AND HIT THE FLOOR WHILE HE WAS BASHING DRUMS, THE CROWD, WHICH WAS NOT RIGHT BY DRUMS GETTING BASHED WOULD HAVE HEARD IT, THIS VIDEO IS BUSTED AND THE FACT IT WAS FRONTED BY THE MSM AS REAL PROVES THIS SHOOTING NEVER HAPPENED AND PROVED THAT POINT IN ONE TAKE.


Date: 2016-01-14; view: 1077


<== previous page | next page ==>
THEY BLEW IT BLEW IT BLEW IT, THERE WERE NO ARABS, THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT DID THIS AND GOT THEIR BODY COUNT BY MURDERING PEOPLE IN CUSTODY! | NOW AN AMATEUR VIDEO OF THE STADIUM BLAST IS OUT THERE, CAVEAT: IT WAS TAKEN INSIDE THE STADIUM, WHILE THE "BLAST" HAPPENED OUTSIDE THE STADIUM, ANOTHER FAKE!
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2024 year. Copyright infringement or personal data (0.008 sec.)