1) Bound use – with auxiliaries to build up analytical forms: He didn’t believe that (it’s not semi-complex, as only 1 predicative line is expressed); She’s writing
2) Function-predicative expansion:
Aspect – He began reading
Modality – He must do that
3) Independent elements (parenthesis):To tell the truth, he is a bad actor.
Note: Independenttly – no immediate contact subject.
4) In predicative constructions:
I want to do it. – simple object
I want you to do it – complex object.
The semi-compound sentence.
It’s a semi-composite structure (2 predicative lines in fusion,dominant line with full predication+semi-predicative line with partial predication) built up on the principle of coordination. Min structure – 2 base sent.
Types: identical element belonging to one (both) of their principal syntactic positions.
(the subject, the predicate, (both)) + semi-compounding – overlapping round the identical element
The front door was open, and also the window. (The front door was open. + The window was open.)-subject coordination – predicate omitted.
He couldn’t recall the face of the girl or remember her name. (He couldn’t recall the face of the girl. + He couldn’t remember her name.)
They went to the museum and then to the theatre. (They went to the museum. + They went to the theatre.) -predicative coordination-subject omitted.
Semi-composite S: Semi complex & semi-compound
Semi-compound S – a semi-composite S built up on the principle of coordination. The minimum pattern – a two-base S. The two-base S-s have identical elements, belonging to one or both of their principle syntactical positions (subject, predicate).
Semi-compounding presupposes overlapping round the identical element. Semi-compound S is built up by means of phraseolization, the very process is called semi-compounding (the transformation of a base S into a phrase).
The front doorwas open and also the window.
The front doorwas open + The windowwas open. (the 2-base S-s have identical predicates)
Hecouldn’t recall the face of the girl or remember her name.
Hecouldn’t recall the face of the girl. + He couldn’t remember her name. (“He” – overlap).
Theywent to the museum and then to the theatre.
Theywent to the museum + Theywent to the theatre. (Identical subjects & predicates).
1) If the 2-base S-soverlap around the identical subject => semi-compound S of predicate coordination.
Hecame closer and opened the window. (the predicatives are different) => a simple S with homogenious predicates.
2) If the 2-base S-s overlap around the identical predicate => semi-compound S of subject coordination.
Helen was there and Jane too. (the subjects are different). A simple S with homogenious subjects.
3) If the 2-base S-s overlap around the identical subject & predicate.
Theywentto the museum and then to the theatre.- a simple S with homogenious adverbial modifiers of place ( adv mod modifies the predicate). In this example adv mod is part of the predicate group.
=> this is a semi-compound S with the identical subject.