Most attributive adjectives denote some attribute of the noun which they modify. For instance, the phrase a red car may be said to denote a car which is red. In fact most adjective-noun sequences such as this can be loosely reformulated in a similar way:
an old man
~a man who is old
difficult questions
~questions which are difficult
round glasses
~glasses which are round
This applies equally to postpositive adjectives:
something understood ~something which is understood the people responsible ~the people who are responsible
In each case the adjective denotes an attribute or quality of the noun, as the reformulations show. Adjectives of this type are known as INHERENT adjectives. The attribute they denote is, as it were, inherent in the noun which they modify.
However, not all adjectives are related to the noun in the same way. For example, the adjective small in a small businessman does not describe an attribute of the businessman. It cannot be reformulated as a businessman who is small. Instead, it refers to a businessman whose business is small. We refer to adjectives of this type as NON-INHERENT adjectives. They refer less directly to an attribute of the noun than inherent adjectives do. Here are some more examples, showing the contrast betwen inherent and non-inherent:
Inherent
Non-inherent
distant hills
distant relatives
a complete chapter
a complete idiot
a heavy burden
a heavy smoker
a social survey
a social animal
an old man
an old friend
Stative and Dynamic Adjectives
As their name suggests, STATIVE adjectives denote a state or condition, which may generally be considered permanent, such as big, red, small. Stative adjectives cannot normally be used in imperative constructions:
*Be big/red/small
Further, they cannot normally be used in progressive constructions:
*He is being big/red/small
In contrast, DYNAMIC adjectives denote attributes which are, to some extent at least, under the control of the one who possesses them. For instance, brave denotes an attribute which may not always be in evidence (unlike red, for example), but which may be called upon as it is required. For this reason, it is appropriate to use it in an imperative:
All dynamic adjectives can be used in imperatives (Be careful!, Don't be cruel!), and they can also be used predicatively in progressive constructions:
Your son is being disruptive in class My parents are being foolish again We're being very patient with you
The majority of adjectives are stative. The stative/dynamic contrast, as it relates to adjectives, is largely a semantic one, though as we have seen it also has syntactic implications.
Nominal Adjectives
Certain adjectives are used to denote a class by describing one of the attributes of the class. For example, the poor denotes a class of people who share a similar financial status. Other nominal adjectives are:
the old the sick the wealthy the blind the innocent
A major subclass of nominal adjectives refers to nationalities:
the French the British the Japanese
However, not all nationalities have corresponding nominal adjectives. Many of them are denoted by plural, proper nouns:
the Germans the Russians the Americans the Poles
Nominal adjectives do not refer exclusively to classes of people. Indeed some of them do not denote classes at all:
the opposite the contrary the good
Comparative and superlative forms can also be nominal adjectives:
the best is yet to come the elder of the two the greatest of these the most important among them
We refer to all of these types as nominal adjectives because they share some of the characteristics of nouns (hence `nominal') and some of the characteristics of adjectives. They have the following nominal characteristics:
they are preceded by a determiner (usually the definite article the)
they can be modified by adjectives (the gallant French, the unfortunate poor)
They have the following adjectival features:
they are gradable (the very old, the extremely wealthy)
many can take comparative and superlative forms (the poorer, the poorest)