![]() CATEGORIES: BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism |
Baehr v. Lewin(1993): Gay Marriage, Equal Rightst The Hawaii Supreme Ct. (NOT the S. Ct.) remanded law prohibiting gay marriageviolated equal rights A. under Hawaii const. (The prohibition did not violate right to privacy.) Marriage has benefits, and is also a vital right essential to orderly pursuit of happiness.
Constitutional Law – Spring 1999 - Major Premises Federalism - Vertical distribution of government power................................................................................ 1 Implied powers - McCulloch v. Maryland – Bank of the U.S...................................................................................... 1 Commerce clause................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Spending power................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Dormant commerce clause (DCC) – Protection against facial discrimination....................................................... 19 10th Amendment - Implied limitations on congressional power -............................................................................. 23 Other Federalism premises................................................................................................................................................ 30 Separation of powers - Horizontal distribution of national power......................................................... 39 Judicial review..................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Jurisdiction and standing................................................................................................................................................... 45 Political question doctrine................................................................................................................................................. 51 Executive authority - domestic........................................................................................................................................ 54 Executive privilege............................................................................................................................................................. 56 Presidential immunity........................................................................................................................................................ 59 Impeachment...................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Bicameralism and presentment....................................................................................................................................... 61 Administrative agencies and the separation of powers............................................................................................... 65 Non delegation doctrine and “quasi-constitutional” statutes..................................................................................... 72 Executive authority – foreign........................................................................................................................................... 76 Legislative authority - foreign.......................................................................................................................................... 79 Other separation of powers premises.............................................................................................................................. 80 Individual rights................................................................................................................................................................ 86 Equal protection................................................................................................................................................................. 87 Privileges or immunities – 14th Amendment.................................................................................................................. 97 Incorporation...................................................................................................................................................................... 98 Contracts clause - Protecting economic liberties - Textual......................................................................................... 99 Privacy, personhood, and family - Modern Substantive due process.................................................................... 110 Case Summaries................................................................................................................................................................. 134
Constitutional Law – Spring 1999.............................................................................................................................. 1 Federalism - Vertical distribution of government power................................................................................ 1 A government of enumerated powers - Why does federalism matter?................................................................. 1 Implied powers - McCulloch v. Maryland – Bank of the U.S....................................................................................... 1 Commerce clause.................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Three regulated categories under commerce clause.................................................................................................. 4 Channels...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Instrumentalities......................................................................................................................................................... 4 “Substantially affecting” commerce...................................................................................................................... 4 Pre New Deal.................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Gibbons v. Ogden – New York steamboat monopoly......................................................................................... 5 United States v. E.C. Knight - Manufacture vs. commerce – Sugar monopoly............................................. 6 Substantial economic effects and stream of commerce.................................................................................... 6 The Shreveport Rate Cases – Substantial economic effects – Railroad rates.......................................... 6 Stafford v. Wallace - Stream of commerce..................................................................................................... 7 Police power................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Champion v. Ames - The Lottery Case............................................................................................................ 7 Hammer v. Dagenhart - Child labor.................................................................................................................. 7 Summary of pre-New Deal law on commerce clause......................................................................................... 8 The New Deal Crisis and the Rise of the Welfare State............................................................................................ 8 Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States............................................................................................................... 9 Carter v. Carter Coal Co......................................................................................................................................... 10 Modern Trend................................................................................................................................................................ 10 NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. - Expanded “substantial economic effect”.................................. 10 Wickard v. Filburn - The “cumulative effect” theory....................................................................................... 11 United States v. Darby - police power regulations - Minimum wage............................................................. 12 Civil rights cases and the commerce clause............................................................................................................. 13 Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States – Local incident of interstate commerce..................................... 13 Katzenbach v. McClung – Ollie’s BBQ............................................................................................................... 13 Effect of Lopez........................................................................................................................................................ 14 Judicial abdication during New Deal......................................................................................................................... 14 United States v. Lopez – Latest word – Guns and schools do mix...................................................................... 15 Reconciling Lopez with New Deal.............................................................................................................................. 17 Current status of commerce clause........................................................................................................................... 17 Does Lopez provide workable rule of law?.............................................................................................................. 17 Spending power.................................................................................................................................................................. 18 United States v. Butler - Beyond enumerated powers...................................................................................... 18 Steward Machine Co. v. Davis.............................................................................................................................. 19 South Dakota v. Dole - National drinking age.................................................................................................... 19 Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman............................................................................................ 19 Dormant commerce clause (DCC) – Protection against facial discrimination..................................................... 19 Gibbons v. Ogden – New York steamboat monopoly................................................................................. 20 Willson v. Black Bird Creek Marsh Co........................................................................................................... 20 Cooley v. Board of Port Wardens (1851) – “Cooley test” – That which is by nature national........... 20 Modern DCC doctrine....................................................................................................................................... 20 City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey – DCC – No solid waste...................................................................... 20 West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy – Milk tax subsidizes in-state farmers........................................... 21 Bobbitt’s modalities and the DCC?................................................................................................................ 21 Market participant exception under commerce clause.................................................................................... 22 Reeves, Inc. v. Stake.......................................................................................................................................... 22 10th Amendment - Implied limitations on congressional power -............................................................................ 23 National League of Cities v. Usery - Traditional government functions test..................................................... 23 Garcia v. San Antonio MTA - Overruled National League of Cities – Minimum wage................................... 23 Use of state’s lawmaking mechanisms..................................................................................................................... 24 New York v. United States - Waste disposal....................................................................................................... 24 Printz v. United States – Brady Bill – Don’t No commandeer state executive............................................ 26 Possible McCulloch theory underlying New York and Printz.......................................................................... 28 U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton..................................................................................................................................... 28 Other Federalism premises............................................................................................................................................... 30 The treaty and war powers.......................................................................................................................................... 30 Missouri v. Holland – Migratory birds................................................................................................................. 30 Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co................................................................................................................................ 30 The taxing power........................................................................................................................................................... 30 Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co................................................................................................................................ 30 The guarantee clause and the reconstruction amendments.................................................................................. 31 Texas v. White.......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Validity of 13th and 14th Amendments................................................................................................................. 31 The power to enforce the reconstruction amendments.................................................................................... 32 Katzenbach v. Morgan – Spanish speaking voters...................................................................................... 32 City of Boerne v. Flores – RFRA Unconstitutional........................................................................................... 32 Limitations on state regulation................................................................................................................................... 35 Typology of Powers...................................................................................................................................................... 35 Preemption..................................................................................................................................................................... 35 The Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV.......................................................................................... 36 United Building Council v. Camden - No market participant exception for PIC................................... 36 Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Ward...................................................................................................... 36 Facially neutral statutes with significant effects on interstate commerce..................................................... 36 Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland.......................................................................................................... 37 Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm’n.............................................................................. 38 Separation of powers - Horizontal distribution of national power......................................................... 39 Distribution of national power - Why does separation of powers matter?......................................................... 39 Formalism vs. functionalism....................................................................................................................................... 39 Judicial review................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Marbury v. Madison – Supreme Court review of congressional statutes........................................................... 40 Theoretical foundation of judicial review................................................................................................................ 42 Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee – Supreme Court review of state court decisions..................................................... 43 Judicial exclusivity........................................................................................................................................................ 44 Cooper v. Aaron - Federal judiciary is supreme – SCt binds states..................................................................... 44 Does judicial review imply judicial supremacy?..................................................................................................... 44 Departmentalism........................................................................................................................................................... 44 Jurisdiction and standing................................................................................................................................................ 45 Ex Parte McCardle - Congressional control of appellate jurisdiction.................................................................. 45 United States v. Klein......................................................................................................................................... 46 Good confusion.................................................................................................................................................. 46 Case or Controversy Requirement............................................................................................................................. 46 Standing.......................................................................................................................................................................... 47 Allen v. Wright - IRS tax-exempt status for segregated private school......................................................... 47 Lujan v. Defenders of the Wildlife – Endangered Species Act........................................................................ 49 Raines v. Byrd - Line item veto............................................................................................................................. 49 Perspective on cases................................................................................................................................................ 50 Political question doctrine.............................................................................................................................................. 51 Baker v. Carr - Apportionment of the Tennessee Assembly........................................................................... 51 Luther v. Borden - Guaranty clause non-justiciable......................................................................................... 52 Why is there a political question doctrine?.......................................................................................................... 52 Davis v. Bandemer - Unconstitutional gerrymandering justiciable................................................................ 52 Nixon v. United States - Impeachment non-justiciable.................................................................................... 52 Coleman v. Miller - Congress gets to say whether USC has been amended................................................. 53 Timing and certiorari............................................................................................................................................... 53 Executive authority - domestic........................................................................................................................................ 54 Executive-Legislative conflicts................................................................................................................................... 54 Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. Sawyer - The Steel Seizure Case...................................................................... 54 Dames & Moore v. Regan - Iran hostage settlement........................................................................................ 55 Executive privilege............................................................................................................................................................ 56 United States v. Nixon – Watergate tapes........................................................................................................... 56 Reviewability of executive privilege decisions......................................................................................................... 57 Scope of executive privilege........................................................................................................................................ 57 National security interests...................................................................................................................................... 58 United States v. AT&T...................................................................................................................................... 58 Legislative Investigations and Civil Proceedings............................................................................................... 59 Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities v. Nixon................................................. 59 Dellums v. Powell................................................................................................................................................ 59 Lower level officials................................................................................................................................................ 59 Presidential immunity....................................................................................................................................................... 59 Mississippi v. Johnson........................................................................................................................................ 59 Nixon v. Fitzgerald............................................................................................................................................. 59 Harlow v. Fitzgerald........................................................................................................................................... 60 Clinton v. Jones................................................................................................................................................... 60 Law and politics............................................................................................................................................................ 60 Law versus politics................................................................................................................................................... 60 Nixon v. Administrator of General Services.................................................................................................. 60 Law as politics.......................................................................................................................................................... 61 Impeachment....................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Bicameralism and presentment........................................................................................................................................ 61 INS v. Chadha - One house veto provision stricken.............................................................................................. 61 General critique by Koppelman............................................................................................................................ 63 Single-house actions approved by USC............................................................................................................... 64 Chadha in context - Legislative control of the bureaucracy........................................................................... 64 The reach of Chadha.............................................................................................................................................. 64 Process Gas Consumers Group v. Consumers Energy Council of America............................................. 64 United States Senate v. FTC............................................................................................................................. 64 A return to the text?................................................................................................................................................. 65 Future directions....................................................................................................................................................... 65 Administrative agencies and the separation of powers.............................................................................................. 65 Meyers v. United States.......................................................................................................................................... 66 The rise of independent agencies.......................................................................................................................... 66 Humphrey’s Executor v. United States - FTC member removal............................................................... 66 Wiener v. United States - War Claims Commission removal..................................................................... 66 Buckley v. Valeo - Appointments Clause and FEC – Officer of the U.S................................................. 67 Various assessments of Myers, Humphrey’s Executor, and Buckley........................................................... 67 Bowsher v. Synar - Good-bye Gramm-Rudman..................................................................................................... 68 Commitment and the budget...................................................................................................................................... 69 Appointments power - Congressional control over administrative officials...................................................... 69 Chadha and Bowsher............................................................................................................................................. 69 Morrison and Bowsher............................................................................................................................................ 69 Koppelman on Morrison and Mistretta............................................................................................................... 70 Non-presidential appointments............................................................................................................................. 70 Freytag v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue............................................................................................. 70 Weiss v. United States........................................................................................................................................ 70 Edmond v. United States.................................................................................................................................. 70 Justice Scalia’s Bowsher and Mistretta dissents................................................................................................. 70 Congressional control of administrative agencies after Chadha and Bowsher........................................... 71 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority.......................................................................................................... 71 Non delegation doctrine and “quasi-constitutional” statutes................................................................................. 72 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................. 72 Non-delegation doctrine......................................................................................................................................... 72 Non-delegation and National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 (NIRA)....................................................... 72 Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan......................................................................................................................... 72 Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States....................................................................................................... 72 Demise of non-delegation doctrine....................................................................................................................... 73 Amalgamated Meat Cutters v. Connally....................................................................................................... 73 Touby v. United States...................................................................................................................................... 73 Loving v. United States..................................................................................................................................... 73 Arguments in favor of reviving non-delegation doctrine.................................................................................. 73 D. Schoenbrod..................................................................................................................................................... 73 Industrial Union v. American Petroleum Institute – Rehnquist dissent.................................................... 73 Ely (Democracy and Distrust).......................................................................................................................... 74 Stewart – against non delegation doctrine..................................................................................................... 74 Lowi’s assessment of the “new” Constitution............................................................................................... 74 Structural statutes.................................................................................................................................................... 75 Executive authority – foreign.......................................................................................................................................... 76 Control of foreign affairs............................................................................................................................................. 76 United States v. Curtiss-Wright Corp. – Foreign arms sales embargo............................................................ 76 Text, history, and presidential power.............................................................................................................. 76 Functionalism and the autonomy of constitutional interpretation........................................................... 76 Allocation of war making authority..................................................................................................................... 77 Approaches toward reconciling these provisions.......................................................................................... 77 Prize Cases - President’s power to use armed forces.................................................................................... 78 Orlando v. Laird – Vietnam non-justiciable................................................................................................. 78 Dellums v. Bush – The Persian Gulf War....................................................................................................... 78 UN “peacekeeping” or “peace enforcement”............................................................................................... 78 Legislative authority - foreign......................................................................................................................................... 79 The War Powers Resolution................................................................................................................................... 79 War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional.................................................................................................... 79 The War Powers Resolution is constitutional................................................................................................ 79 Practice under the Resolution........................................................................................................................... 79 The Constitution without courts – War Powers and Boland............................................................................ 80 Other separation of powers premises............................................................................................................................. 80 Treaties...................................................................................................................................................................... 80 Executive Agreements............................................................................................................................................ 80 Dames & Moore v. Regan - Constitutional limits on scope of executive agreements........................... 80 United States v. Belmont.................................................................................................................................. 80 Congressional-executive agreements................................................................................................................... 81 Impoundment.......................................................................................................................................................... 81 Line item vetoes....................................................................................................................................................... 82 Unfunded mandates............................................................................................................................................... 82 New York v. United States – No unfunded mandates – 10th Amendment.............................................. 82 Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995...................................................................................................... 82 Contract with America...................................................................................................................................... 82 Constitutional amendment to balance the budget............................................................................................ 82 Morrison v. Olson – Special prosecutor laws............................................................................................................ 83 Mistretta v. United States – U.S. Sentencing Commission.................................................................................... 84 Final thoughts on separation of powers.................................................................................................................... 85 Individual rights................................................................................................................................................................ 86 Overview......................................................................................................................................................................... 86 Equal protection................................................................................................................................................................ 87 Utility of equal protection analysis....................................................................................................................... 87 Race and the Constitution..................................................................................................................................... 87 Slavery and the Constitution................................................................................................................................. 87 State v. Post......................................................................................................................................................... 87 Dred Scott v. Sanford........................................................................................................................................ 87 Reconstruction and retreat..................................................................................................................................... 88 Strauder v. West Virginia – Invalidated law barring blacks from juries................................................... 88 Plessy v. Ferguson – Separate but equal – Railroad cars............................................................................ 89 Equal protection methodology - strict scrutiny.................................................................................................. 90 Korematsu v. United States (Black 1944) – Japanese WWII interment.................................................. 90 Overview of equal protection doctrine................................................................................................................. 92 The attack on Jim Crow......................................................................................................................................... 93 Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (Brown I) – School desegregation......................................... 93 Bolling v. Sharpe - 14th Amendment equal protection federal via 5th Amendment............................... 94 Brown II............................................................................................................................................................... 95 Facially neutral laws that disadvantage minorities........................................................................................... 96 Washington v. Davis.......................................................................................................................................... 96 Privileges or immunities – 14th Amendment.................................................................................................................. 97 The Slaughter-House Cases – New Orleans slaughtering monopoly................................................................... 97 Slaugheter-House remains good law.................................................................................................................... 98 Incorporation...................................................................................................................................................................... 98 Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore.................................................................................................. 98 Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co................................................................................................. 99 Twining v. New Jersey............................................................................................................................................. 99 Palko v. Connecticut – Double jeopardy............................................................................................................ 99 Adamson v. California – Black dissent - Total incorporation......................................................................... 99 Duncan v. Louisiana............................................................................................................................................... 99 Contracts clause - Protecting economic liberties - Textual....................................................................................... 99 Fletcher v. Peck – Corrupt land sale contract not voidable by State........................................................... 100 Ogden v. Saunders – State bankruptcy law valid prospectively................................................................... 101 Calder v. Bull – Ex post facto - Historical Modality – Criminal only............................................................... 101 Home Building and Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell..................................................................................................... 102 Modern contracts clause law and AK analysis................................................................................................ 102 Substantive due process - Protecting economic interests - “Redistribution”.................................................... 103 Lochner v. New York – Time to make the donuts – No maximum hours for bakers.............................. 103 AK’s lecture on Lochner................................................................................................................................. 104 Civil War makes Lochner look less crazy.................................................................................................... 105 Structural and ethical basis for Lochner holding........................................................................................ 105 Dissent - Harlan................................................................................................................................................ 106 Dissent - Holmes............................................................................................................................................... 106 Forming an opinion of Lochner..................................................................................................................... 106 Lochner Era - most significant judicial interventions in American history............................................ 106 Munn v. Illinois - Escape hatch from Lochner – “Public interest”.......................................................... 107 Muller v. Oregon – Another escape hatch – Women “special class”...................................................... 107 Bailey v. Alabama – Personal service contracts enforced by jail time no more....................................... 107 Nebbia v. New York.............................................................................................................................................. 108 West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish – The death of Lochner – Female minimum wage............................... 108 United States v. Carolene Products Co. – Filled milk..................................................................................... 108 Williamson v. Lee Optical - Full employment for ophthalmologists............................................................ 109 Ferguson v. Skrupa................................................................................................................................................ 109 Summary of substantive due process - Economic rights............................................................................... 109 Privacy, personhood, and family - Modern Substantive due process.................................................................... 110 West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette - Overview....................................................................... 110 The right of privacy.................................................................................................................................................... 110 Individual rights after the New Deal.................................................................................................................. 110 Meyer v. Nebraska – Okay to teach foreign language to school children............................................. 111 Pierce v. Society of Sisters.............................................................................................................................. 111 Griswold v. Connecticut - Condommania................................................................................................... 111 Eisenstadt v. Baird........................................................................................................................................... 114 Abortion.................................................................................................................................................................. 114 Roe v. Wade...................................................................................................................................................... 114 Roe and Griswold............................................................................................................................................. 116 Planned Parenthood v. Casey – Abortion waiting period and other restrictions.................................. 116 AK’s approach to abortion question............................................................................................................ 122 Bowers v. Hardwick - Sodomy........................................................................................................................... 124 Washington v. Glucksberg - Physician-assisted suicide.................................................................................. 126 Sex and sexual orientation........................................................................................................................................ 129 Reed v. Reed..................................................................................................................................................... 129 Frontiero v. Richardson – Classification based on sex inherently suspect............................................ 129 Craig v. Boren – Beer sales to 18 – 20 year-old women only, not men................................................. 129 United States v. Virginia – VMI gender integration................................................................................... 130 Other Candidates for heightened scrutiny........................................................................................................ 132 Romer v. Evans – Special rights for gays.................................................................................................... 132 Case Summaries................................................................................................................................................................. 134 Strauder v. West Virginia (1880): 14th Amendment.................................................................................. 134 Peters v. Kiff (1972): 14th Amendment....................................................................................................... 134 Plessy v. Ferguson (1896): 13th, 14th Amendments................................................................................... 134 Brown v. Board of Education (1954): 14th Amendment, Equal Protection.......................................... 134 Bolling v. Sharpe (1954): 5th Amendment, Equal Protection, Due Process.......................................... 135 Marbury v. Madison (1803): Judicial Review, Interpret Constitution................................................... 135 Cooper v. Aaron (1958): Judicial Review, Interpret Constitution........................................................... 135 Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. Ed. (1971): 14th Amendment, Segregation.............................. 136 Freeman v. Pitts (1992): 14th Amendment, School Desegregation.......................................................... 136 Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee (1816): Supremacy Clause, Judicial Review............................................... 136 McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): Implied Power, 10th Amendment........................................................ 137 US Term Limits v. Thornton (1995): 10th Amendment, Term Limits..................................................... 137 Gibbons v. Ogden (1824): Commerce Clause, Federal v. States............................................................. 138 US v. E.C. Knight (1895): Commerce, Anti-Trust...................................................................................... 138 Champion v. Ames [lottery case] (1903): Commerce.............................................................................. 139 Swift & Co. v. US (1905): Commerce, “Current of Commerce”............................................................ 139 The Shreveport Rate Case (1914): Commerce, “close and substantial relation”................................ 139 Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918): Commerce, 10th Amendment................................................................. 140 NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin (1937) Commerce Clause, New Deal legislation....................................... 140 US v. Darby (1941): Commerce Clause, Child Labor, Manufacturing................................................. 141 Heart of Atlanta Motel (1964): Commerce Clause, Civil Rights Act 1964......................................... 141 Katzenbach v. McClung (1964): Commerce Clause, Civil Rights Act 1964........................................ 141 US v. Lopez (1995): Commerce Clause, Guns in school zone................................................................ 142 South Dakota v. Dole (1987): Commerce Clause, 21st Amendment..................................................... 143 Missouri v. Holland (1920): 10th Amendment............................................................................................ 143 Katzenbach v. Morgan (S.Car.) (1966): 14th A., Due Process, Literacy to Vote................................... 143 Boerne City v. Flores (1997): 1st A. Free exercise v. 14th A. Legislative authority................................ 143 Jones v. Mayer Co. (1968): 13th Amendment, Equal Housing................................................................ 144 Garcia v. San Antonio Metro Transit Auth. (1985) 10th A., Federalism................................................. 145 New York v. United States (1992): 10th Amendment, Supremacy Clause............................................ 145 Printz v. United States (1997): 10th A., Commerce Clause, Original Intent........................................... 146 Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852): Federalism, Concurrent Powers.................................................. 147 City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey (1978): Dormant Commerce Clause.............................................. 147 Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. (1981): Safety v. Commerce.............................................. 148 West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy (1994): Interstate Commerce....................................................... 148 Corfield v. Coryell (1823): Privilege and Immunity Clause..................................................................... 148 United Bldg. v. Camden (1984) Privilege & Immunity v. Commerce Clause...................................... 149 Youngstown Co. v. Sawyer (1952): Separation of Powers, Emergency power.................................... 149 US v. Curtiss-Wright Corp. (1936) Separation of Power, External v. Internal...................................... 149 Dames & Moore v. Regan (1981): Implicit powers................................................................................... 149 Korematsu v. United States (1944): Emergency Executive Order.......................................................... 149 United States v. Nixon (1974): Executive Privilege................................................................................... 150 Clinton v. Jones (1997): Separation of Powers, Presidential Immunity................................................. 151 Mistretta v. United States (1989) “Non delegation” of Congressional Power....................................... 151 INS v. Chadha (1983): Legislative Veto...................................................................................................... 151 Clinton v. City of New York (1998): Separation of Powers, Line Item Veto........................................ 152 Bowsher v. Synar: (1986): Separation of Powers...................................................................................... 152 Morrison v. Olson (1988): Separation of Powers, Independent Counsel............................................... 152 Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon (1982): Separation of powers, delegation..................................... 152 Commodity Futures T.C. v. Schor (1986): Separation of Power, delegation........................................ 153 Ex Parte McCardle (1869) Separation of Powers, Exceptions clause.................................................... 153 Baker v. Carr (1962): Limits on Judicial Power, Political Questions....................................................... 154 Nixon v. United States (1993): Limits, Political Question......................................................................... 154 Raines v. Byrd (1997): Limits, Standing...................................................................................................... 154 Allen v. Wright (1984): Limits, Standing...................................................................................................... 155 Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (1975): Limits, Standing.......................................................................... 155 Missouri v. Jenkins (II) (1990): Limit, Scope of remedy.......................................................................... 155 Missouri v Jenkins (III) (1995): Limits Jurisdiction................................................................................... 156 Fletcher v. Peck (1810): Economic Liberties, Property Rights................................................................. 156 Ogden v. Saunders (1827): Economic Liberties, Contracts Clause........................................................ 157 Calder v. Bull: (1798): Economic Liberties, Ex post facto....................................................................... 157 The Slaughter House Cases (1873): Economic Liberties, 13th, 14th A, Monopolies............................. 158 Palko v. Connecticut (1937): Double Jeopardy, Due Process (14th A.).................................................. 158 Adamson v. California (1947): 5th A. not part of Due Process (14th A.)................................................. 159 Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942): Due Process, Sterilization.......................................................................... 159 Lochner v. New York (1905): Substantive Due Process, Freedom to Contract.................................... 160 Bailey v. Alabama (1910): 13th A., Race Discrimination......................................................................... 160 West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937): 5th, 14th A., Freedom to Contract................................................... 161 Williamson v. Lee Optical (1955): 14th A., Due Process, Judicial Power................................................ 161 Meyer v. Nebraska (1923): 14th A., Due Process, Privacy........................................................................ 162 Poe v. Ullman (1961): 14th A., Due Process, Individual Rights, “Ripeness”.......................................... 162 Griswold v. Connecticut (1965): 14th, 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 9th A., Privacy........................................................ 163 Roe v. Wade (1973): Privacy, Abortion (9th, 14th A.)................................................................................. 163 Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992): Privacy, Abortion......................................................................... 164 Bowers v. Hardwick (1986): Fundamental Rights, Sodomy, 8th A......................................................... 165 Washington v. Glucksberg (1997): Privacy, Right to Die, 14th A............................................................. 166 Railway Express Agency v. New York (1949): 14th A., Rational Basis review..................................... 166 FCC v. Beach Communications (1993): 5th, 14th A, Rational Basis Review........................................ 167 Bradwell v. Illinois (1873): 14th A., Gender Discrimination...................................................................... 167 Frontiero v. Richardson (1973): 5th A., Gender Discrimination................................................................ 168 Craig v. Boren (1976): 14th A., Gender Discrimination.............................................................................. 168 U.S. v. Virginia (1996): 14th A., Gender Discrimination............................................................................. 168 Watkins v. U.S. Army (1989): 14th A, Gay Discrimination, Status v. Conduct..................................... 170 Romer v. Evans (1996): 14th A., Gay Discrimination, political participation........................................ 170 Baehr v. Lewin (1993): Gay Marriage, Equal Rights................................................................................ 170
Cases Adamson v. California---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 130, 199 Adkins v. Children’s Hospital-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 139, 141 Allen v. Wright------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 63, 64, 196 Amalgamated Meat Cutters v. Connally-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82, 97 Baehr v. Lewin--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209 Bailey v. Alabama--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 141, 161, 201 Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 Baker v. Carr------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 67, 71, 143, 195 Barron v. Baltimore--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 128 Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 130 Bolling v. Sharpe------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 123, 179 Bowers v. Hardwick- Date: 2015-01-02; view: 798
|