Read a part of the interview about truancy. Find out the main reason for truancy from the point of view of Glen Hall.

Journalist: Glen, according to your study of high school students which forms the basis of your book ”The Truth about Truancy”, it seems truancy is not a trend among poor or troubled children as previously thought, but rather the result of students acting as consumers of their education. Will you share with our readers your rather controversial findings?

Glen Hall: Well, it isn’t so much the result of the study that shocks people but the fact that 90 percent of the three hundred students surveyed actually admitted to playing truant. Some people were also surprised to find that truancy has nothing to do with a pupil’s race, sex or economic class, none of which surprised me. What did interest me, however, was that it also showed that many students are actively deciding what classes they want to attend or don’t want to attend. It’s not always a case of them missing school because they’d rather do something else. We concluded that the consumer society in which we live is to blame in that it has trained young people to exercise their freedom to choose based on their personal tastes and preferences. It appears that students are merely extending that freedom to their education.

The findings also showed that students often played truant because they felt that a lot of classes were not worth attending and rarely, if ever, demanded their full engagement or input. For example, many students admitted that, when word gets out that a substitute is taken a class, rather than a regular teacher, they are far more likely to miss that class because they don’t feel they are going to get their money’s worth, so to speak.

Basically, what the survey seems to be telling us is that today’s students are more sophisticated than those of past generations and that when you take away their right and, worse, their desire to make their own decisions, you are depriving them of the opportunity to learn a very important life-skill. We believe that involving students in curriculum development will make them more willing to take part in their own education. So I don’t believe it’s controversial to say that now is the time for educators to allow students to make decisions about their education. Furthermore we believe this approach of treating students as consumers would not only go some way to solving the truancy problem but also providing information on ineffective teachers and teaching methods…

19. Answer the questions.

a. What word does the journalist use to describe the results of Glen’s survey?

b. What is the most shocking about the results of the study?

c. How is truancy related to a student’s gender, ethnic or social background?

d. According to Glen’s conclusion, who is responsible for encouraging truancy?

e. Which lessons are students more likely to avoid?

f. How do today’s students differ from those of past generations?

g. How can the problem of truancy be solved?

20. Which of the following things do you think would be most effective in combating truancy? Rank them, then compare your list to your partner’s.

- more interesting lessons

- police involvement

- more responsible parenting

- strict punishment

- teaching students to respect school

Date: 2015-12-17; view: 2073