· The report was logically organized and presented.
· The report showed deep reflection and extensive understanding of the concepts of the case study.
· The report was free of serious errors in pronunciation and word usage
· The presentation was well adapted to the audience.
· The report was delivered in fluent, emphatic and polished manner
· The student was clearly prepared for class discussion, is knowledgeable of materials of the case study, made regular contributions.
· The student properly analyzed the problem.
· The student showed critical thinking skills and a good level of speaking skills
· The student listened attentively to others, provided focused, well-reasoned responses, asked effective questions
· The student spoke in an audible voice, clearly articulated ideas, conveyed enthusiasm
· Ideas were organized effectively, with the use of a variety of linking devices and a wide range of structure and vocabulary.
· The issue of the case study was sufficiently identified and described.
· The student presented the ideas in a unique and innovative way, showed critical understanding of the case study
· All arguments had appropriate support
· The essay was written in a style and tone appropriate to the topic and purpose.
Case Study Essay
Plan
Introduction
Paragraph 1 Introduction of the case
Main Body Case study analysis
Paragraph 2 Suggestions and results
Paragraph 3 Suggestions and results возникнет вопрос, зачем два раза повторять, логичнее написать параграф 2,3 …..
Conclusion
Paragraph 4 Solutions and recommendations
Before writing an essay look through the list of the questions that are going around the key facts necessary to be included in your writing.
Questions
What is the situation discussed in the case?
What are the real facts?
Are you able to distinguish facts from assumptions?
What are the main issues discussed?
What questions do you have after reading the case study?
Do you need any additional information?
Where and how can you find it?
What are the problems to be solved?
What are the possible options at hand?
What are the pros of the available options?
What are the cons?
What are the underlying assumptions?
How are you able to distinguish those?
What criteria are you to use when choosing the option?
What are the biggest challenges?
What are the relevant details to support the argument?
Do scenes flow in a logical order?
Are there any inappropriate problem solutions?
Are the problems clear to the reader?
What should the readers learn in the conclusion?
CASE OF TERNOVIK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
(Application no. 19430/06 and 19 other applications)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
11 April 2013
This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Ternovik and Others v. Ukraine,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Boštjan M.Zupančič, President, AnnPower-Forde, HelenaJäderblom, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 19 March 2013,
Having noted that the underlying legal issue in the applications is already the subject of well-established case-law of the Court (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine, no. 40450/04, 15 October 2009),
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: