BENEFITS

IN JANUARY this year a vast number of would-be travellers were stranded at railway stations and on roads in China, after an unusually heavy snowfall blanketed the south of the country just before the country’s new-year festivities. What amazed the world (in addition to the unusual sight of a prime minister apologising for his government’s slowness) was the unprecedented scale of the disruption: an estimated 200m people were on the move.

Governments in many poor countries react with a shudder to this sort of news item—and indeed to any news that seems to expose the fragility of newly urbanised economies. Most of those frustrated Chinese travellers were migrant workers going from cities to their families in the countryside or vice versa. Movement on such a scale seems inevitable, given the sort of urbanisation China and others have experienced: over the past 30 years, the world’s urban population has risen from 1.6 billion to 3.3 billion, and over the next 30 years cities in the developing world are set to grow by an extra 2 billion. But many governments have become doubtful of their ability to cope with urbanisation on such an enormous scale; some have concluded that they ought to slow the process down in order to minimise social upheaval. This view owes as much to anti-urban bias as it does to sober analysis.

In 2005, more than half the poor countries surveyed by the UN Population Division said they wanted to reduce internal migration to rein in urban growth. The food crisis of the past 18 months has sharpened worries about how to feed the teeming slums. This week the UN’s secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon, warned the biennial World Urban Forum meeting in Nanjing that 2 billion could be living in slums in the year 2030 and that “urban areas consume most of the world’s energy and are generating the bulk of our waste.”

Such fears of urban over-concentration are reflected in the policies of many different countries. Saudi Arabia is spending billions on new super-cities to ease the growth of Jeddah and Riyadh. Egypt is building 20 new cities to divert people away from Cairo. It plans 45 more. And attempts by poor countries to alter the course of urbanisation have a long pedigree in the rich world. In the 1950s and 1960s, Britain and France built lots of new towns to counter-balance their capitals’ dominance.

Yet new research published by the World Bank in its annual flagship World Development Report* suggests that pessimism over the future of huge cities is wildly overdone. The bank argues that third-world cities grow so big and so fast precisely because they generate vast economic advantages, and that these gains may be increasing. Slowing urbanisation down, or pushing it towards places not linked with world markets, is costly and futile, the bank says. At a time of contagion and bail-outs, the research also reaffirms the unfashionable view that the basic facts of geography—where people live and work, how they get around—matter as much as financial and fiscal policies. (The award of this year’s Nobel prize for economics to Paul Krugman of Princeton University for his work on the location of economic activity was another reflection of that view.)

The bank’s research yields lots of new insights. It argues, for example, that the share of humanity that lives in cities is slightly lower than most people think. The bank drew up a fresh index to get around the knotty problem of defining “urban”; this new measure puts the world’s city-dwelling population at about 47% in 2000. In fact—as Indermit Gill, who oversaw the report, acknowledges—it is impossible to pinpoint the proportion: the urban slice of humanity may be anywhere between 45% and 55%, depending on how you count. The report’s main point is that, whatever their exact dimensions, the Gotham Cities of the poor world should not be written off as a disaster simply on grounds that they are too big, too chaotic, too polluted and too unequal.

It is true that they are unprecedented in size. Mexico City, Mumbai, São Paulo and Shanghai each have over 15m people, whereas Paris and London, after their surge in the 19th century, had less than half that. The average population of the world’s 100 largest cities now exceeds 6m. In 1900, it was only 700,000.

But relative to the size of countries’ populations, the current growth is far from unusual. Between 1985 and 2005 the urban share of the population of developing countries rose by eight percentage points. Between 1880 and 1900, the bank says, the urban share in then-industrialising Europe and America went up by about the same amount. Over time, cities as disparate as Santiago (in Chile), Seoul, Lisbon and São Paulo have all followed strikingly similar paths, rising fast until they made up about a quarter of their countries’ populations, then stabilising when the country’s income hit about $5,000 per person (see chart). This path roughly tracks the transition of a country from an agricultural to an industrial base. Many countries are undergoing that sort of transition now, and therefore urbanisation is accelerating. But history suggests it will not go on rising at this rate for ever.

History also suggests that the income gaps that worry governments will narrow. As people move to the city, urban wages are typically 40-50% higher than unskilled farm earnings (that was the premium in Europe in the 19th century; it is about the same in developing countries today). But the income gaps of rich countries have narrowed, so living standards in the West today are roughly the same between town and country. That convergence is starting in poor countries, too: in poorer Malawi and Sri Lanka, city dwellers account for a much bigger share of consumption than of population (20% compared with 10%). But in richer Chile and Brazil, urbanites account for only slightly more consumption than population.

So one answer to the question—why are third-world cities so big?—is that they are not in relative terms all that large. But another answer, suggests the World Bank, is that they are big because they do an economic job that is becoming more, not less, important.

Cities are products of trade. Market towns trade crops. Second cities produce and trade manufactured goods. Metropolises design, make and sell everything, especially services. Over the past 50 years world trade has expanded hugely, especially in services, and giant cities have thrived correspondingly. Among the most striking of these urban success stories are cities in southern China that most people outside the region have never heard of because they were collections of villages just 20 years ago. Take, for example, Dongguan, in southern China. This little-known city in the Pearl River delta makes 30% of the magnetic recording heads used in hard drives across the world and 16% of the world’s electronic keyboards. Its population has risen from tens of thousands 20 years ago to 7m today.

What has made such growth possible, argues the bank, is cheap transport. Falling transport costs in the 18th and 19th centuries enabled Britain and Portugal to trade wool and port (as the political economist David Ricardo memorably pointed out). Cheap transport in the past 25 years has produced a second sort of trade revolution. Countries now sell each other not final products like port but intermediate ones such as recording heads for hard drives. That has been made possible by an extraordinary fragmentation of production: every step in the production line is broken down. Parts are made separately, then shipped for assembly.

This matters because many of today’s cities are places where lots of different factories turn out the same specialised components. In some ways, this specialisation and concentration of manufacturing seems strange: if parts can be made anywhere, it might appear more efficient to make them in the middle of nowhere, where land is cheapest. Yet factory owners like to cluster together because of the concentration of skills, as well as infrastructure, that cities offer. Workers with particular competences migrate to places where those skills are in demand—and all the businesses that need those skills benefit. Consumers, naturally, appreciate cities because it is easier to shop where goods are available in one place. And business services (banking, insurance, consultancy) cluster round the honeypot. Indeed, the usefulness of concentrating business services is all the greater in an era of much increased capital flows (the credit crunch notwithstanding). In short, the bank suggests a formula: the fragmentation of production lines, plus the clustering together of particular stages in the production line, plus cheap transport, equals higher productivity in the biggest cities.

If it is so important where economic activity takes place, what should countries do if they lack big cities—perhaps because they are landlocked, or cut off from world markets or have many poor people living in rural areas? These, the bank thinks, are the real problems of urbanisation, not the multiplication of slums or congestion. The answer, in the bank’s view, depends on why people are cut off.

If they are trapped in underemployment in remote rural areas, the main task is to establish land markets and basic services (schools, streets, sanitation) to help cities grow. This is the situation in much of Africa and remote parts of China, which last month took a few hesitant steps to liberalise its rural land markets. But countries are all too rarely willing to stand back and let cities grow: Tanzania and Ethiopia, to name just two, are busily trying to slow urbanisation down, despite the fact that three-quarters of their people are stuck in rural poverty.

Where urbanisation has started but pockets of the population are trapped far away, governments have to focus more on transport and other sorts of infrastructure to connect lagging regions with fast-growing ones. This is happening in western China, which is being linked up by air, road and rail with booming Chongqing. It is not until a more advanced stage of urbanisation is reached—with 75% of the population in cities (like, say, northern Egypt or Rio de Janeiro)—that it makes any sense to spend a lot on such policies as slum clearances, lest the now-teeming city is split apart by crime and grime.

These prescriptions have something in common. For poor countries, the key to development is to link up flagging and fast-growing regions. To do that, governments often overemphasise policies targeted on particular places. In practice, there are more powerful instruments of integration than “spatially targeted” efforts—eg, land markets that unify all places, or infrastructure that connects some places to others. Growth, says the bank, is inevitably lumpy. Governments must learn to like it.

BENEFITS

How to find out if you qualify for benefits

You may be entitled to receive benefits if you are on a low income or have certain costs to meet because of your personal situation.

Check our information

If any of the following apply to you:

· you're on a low income (employed or looking for work)

· you have dependent children

· you're ill or disabled

· you're caring for someone

· you're aged 60 or over

· you have been bereaved

· you're pregnant or have recently had a baby

You can check whether you may qualify to receive financial or other support by using the benefits adviser service. Or by reading the benefits and financial support information. This will tell you who can and can't claim specific benefits and other support, and next steps.

Benefits advice if you are of working age

If you are of working age, you can contact Jobcentre Plus. Whether you are already working or are looking for work, the staff there will be able to tell you about any benefits you can claim. You can find the contact details for Jobcentre Plus in the phone book or by visiting the Jobcentre Plus website.

How to claim benefit

The government has a range of benefits to provide opportunities and support. These are handled by various departments and agencies. If you are entitled to any of these benefits, you will need to claim them from the right place. Find out how to claim the different types of benefit.

The different types of benefit

Benefits are available for people of working age, for pensioners, for families and children, and for disabled people and their carers. Each of these areas is handled by different departments or parts of departments. Making a claim from the right area will make sure you get your benefit as quickly as possible.

Benefits are divided into four groups:

· benefits for people of working age

· benefits for people who have retired or who are planning to retire

· benefits for families and children

· benefits for disabled people and carers

Benefits for people of working age

If you are looking for work (or are in low paid work) you can get financial help and support from Jobcentre Plus and HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).

Benefits if you have retired or are planning to retire

Everyone is entitled to a basic State Pension, and many people of pensionable age are entitled to other benefits. These are now administered by The Pension Service.

Benefits for families and children

If you're responsible for a child, you can normally get Child Benefit for them. Additional support is available for families who have particular requirements, such as children with special needs, lone parent families, expecting a baby and so on. This help is provided by different sections of the Department for Work and Pensions, and HMRC. Jobcentre Plus will help you find the right department to answer any questions you may have.

Benefits for disabled people and carers

There is a range of local and central government support available for people who are sick, or who are disabled. There is also support for the people who care for them. The support tends to vary according to the nature of illness or disability: for example, whether it is long-term, whether you were in work when you became ill or disabled, and whether the illness involves a stay in hospital or a care home.

Who to ask about your benefit

Jobcentre Plus will help you with any questions you have about your benefits situation.

To find your local pensions office, use the link below.

You can find contact details for benefits administered by HMRC, such as tax credits and Child Benefit, using the following link.

Making a new or repeat claim for benefit

You can now ring Jobcentre Plus on a new number to make a benefit claim.

Phone: 0800 0 55 66 88

Text phone: 0800 0 23 48 88 if you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have speech difficulties.

Calls are free from a landline. Charges may apply when calling from a mobile phone, but Jobcentre Plus will arrange to call you back if you ask.

Phone lines are open from 8.00 am to 6.00 pm, Monday to Friday.

The call will take about 40 minutes. You should call from:

· home, if possible; or

· from somewhere where you are comfortable and where other people cannot overhear your personal information

You will speak to an operator who will guide you through making a new claim or renewing the details of a claim that has recently closed. During the call you will be asked to provide information including:

· your National Insurance number

· details of your rent or mortgage

· details of your past or present employment

· details of other income and savings

Please make sure that you have this information handy when you call.

The operator will tell you what will happen next with your claim. For example, they may make you an appointment to see an adviser at your nearest Jobcentre Plus office to help with your search for work. They can also tell you who to contact if you have a question about your benefit.

Jobcentre Plus can only accept calls from the person who is making the claim, unless you have made previous arrangements for someone to act on your behalf.

Do it online

You can claim Income Support, Employment and Support Allowance or Incapacity Benefit online.

For the following benefits you don't need to meet a personal adviser unless you want to or you are claiming other benefits through Jobcentre Plus:

· bereavement benefits

· Carers Allowance

· Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit

· Maternity Allowance

·

Date: 2014-12-29; view: 967