![]() CATEGORIES: BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism |
Jose Perdomo claimed Chapman called to Lennon
JEANNE DOWNEY, of Channel 2, CBS in New York, interviewed crime scene witness SEAN STRUB live outside the Roosevelt Hospital, where Lennon was pronounced dead (see Figures 6 & 7). Although Strub was a crime scene witness who heard the shots from nearby and followed police to the Dakota, Strub was not actually present at the Dakota entrance when the shooting occurred. As previously stated, Strub identified Dakota doorman, Jose Perdomo, as the individual who first stated that verbal communication occurred between Chapman and Lennon, moments before the shooting, a point Chapman later denied at his sentencing hearing, and the judge accepted his explanation.
The following is a transcript of Strub’s description of what he saw and heard:
JD: Did you see Mr. Lennon at that time?
STRUB: Yeah, they were just bringing Lennon out of the, sort of an entryway, the driveway between the sidewalk and the courtyard, and he was limp; there were about six officers carrying him. He had a little bit of blood coming out of his mouth.
JD: And Police tell us they do have a suspect. Did you see anyone?
STRUB: Yeah, they scuffled with a guy and arrested him; he was about thirty-five, he was white, brown hair.
JD: Was he alone?
STRUB: He was the only person I saw. Yoko was there.
JD: She was?
STRUB: And they put him in a squad car and took off.
JD: Was there any kind of an exchange, do you know, between Lennon and the suspect? STRUB: That’s what the doorman [Jose Perdomo] said that there had been some sort of altercation or argument; I heard the cops say that Lennon was hit twice in the back. I heard someone else say that the guy had apparently been hanging around all evening, and another person said he’d been there all week, and he was just kind of like waiting for him.
It's interesting how Sean Strub's explanation was so thorough, so detailed, but virtually all of it was second-hand. In other words, whether it was intentional or accidental, he planted the seeds of the official cover story to the media just minutes after the crime had been committed, but with virtually no accountability, since he didn't see anything other than blood on Lennon's mouth. It's quite possible Strub could have been a phony witness. For a crime of this magnitude, witnesses can be bought for a dime a dozen.
An unidentified female witness (see Figure 8) gave a slightly different account of the shooting than Strub's. The woman--whose description of the crime was broadcast on Channel 7 Eyewitness News--was at the Dakota when the shooting started, but apparently did not actually see the identity of the person who shot Lennon, she only heard the shots. Nevertheless, she witnessed events before and after the shooting, and did not mention anything about words being exchanged between Lennon and Chapman. The following is the unidentified woman's description of the shooting:
Putting this information together with the newly obtained death certificate, it is highly doubtful that Mark David Chapman killed anyone, least of all John Lennon.
END Date: 2015-12-11; view: 950
|