SEVERAL GROUPS WORKING TO EXPOSE THIS

Brave and heroic whistleblower sites like Veterans Today and Infowars have been exposing this scam for some time now -- and so have we.

"Proxy war" is how the real powers behind the scenes have been manipulating political events to their advantage for hundreds, if not thousands of years.

The power elite always use someone else to do their dirty work.

If the mercenaries themselves don't know who they are really working for, they can't rat out their controllers even if they get captured and tortured.

However, with the communication and surveillance tech available to everyone in today's world, it is no longer possible to play these games in secret.

THE "ISIS" PRESS RELEASE CLAIMING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PARIS ATTACKS MAY HAVE BEEN WRITTEN BY THE CABAL

Even in mainstream media, there are ongoing clues that ISIS is just a front for something much bigger and more powerful, as we have just discussed.

Consider this Politico article from November 14th, discussing the mystery of the Paris shootings being blamed on ISIS and how it just doesn't add up.

The reason it smells fishy, in this case, is the group posing as ISIS did not take credit for these attacks in any "normal" way.

It's as if someone in the West wrote their own press release and designed it to look like their Arab patsies in ISIS had written it.

Politico noticed that this was sloppy work, and did not appear to have been written by real Muslims at all:

11/14: ISIS Mystery: Who’s Calling the Shots?

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/11/isil-whos-calling-the-shots-213360

This morning, Islamic State channels pushed out official statements praising the attacks. Many have read this message, which gloated and moralized and promised a torrent of future attacks, as a claim of credit...

But the statement gave no indication of having planned or funded the attack, and indeed the message contained no information other than what the authors could have learned from reading their doorstep copy of The Washington Post.

It did not give the martyrs their customary send-off to Paradise, with smiling photos showing hairy faces and index fingers extended to heaven, nor an interview, or even mention of a nom de guerre.

Moreover, the statement contained infelicities of style and spelling, as if it had been written and translated without the Islamic State's usual editorial punctiliousness....

One explanation for this hurried claim of credit or endorsement may be that there exists a third possibility, somewhere between "IS did it" and the increasingly far-fetched"IS didn't."

That possibility is something like "IS was surprised by what its supporters did -- and maybe not altogether pleased."

ISIS COULDN'T HAVE SHOT DOWN THE RUSSIAN PLANE EITHER

The Paris mass shooting happened on Friday the 13th. The Russian airliner was downed on All Hallow's Eve, or what most call Halloween -- October 31st.

Hmmmm. Is this also "just a coincidence?"

Both Friday the 13th and Halloween could be considered ritual holidays for groups that actively worship and practice what most people would call evil.

Now let's go back to the downed airliner. Russia's own mainstream media, Russia Today, firmly established that "ISIS" could not have done this:

11/1: RT: What We Do and Don’t Know After Russia’s Deadliest-Ever Air Crash

https://www.rt.com/news/320432-russian-sinai-crash-facts/

HOW DID THE PLANE CRASH?

The head of Russian aviation agency Rosaviatsia, Aleksandr Neradko, has said that “all signs testify to the fact that the destruction of the structure of the airplane took place in the air and at a great altitude.”

The principal evidence is that the remains of the plane and the bodies have been scattered over an area measuring about 8 km by 4 km.

An Egyptian military source told the media that the plane cracked open into two main segments, one of which collided with a rock on impact.

WHY DID IT CRASH?

This is the big question, as of now. Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL)-affiliated militants, based in Sinai, stole a march on officials, when they claimed responsibility for the downing of the plane.

Russian authorities – backed up by Egyptian officials – have dismissed the boasts as being out of hand.

[They said] the terrorists in the region do not possess the specialized equipment necessary to shoot down a large passenger jet flying at cruising height.

THE ONLY POSSIBLE EXPLANATION IS AN EXTERNAL IMPACT -- BUT FROM WHO?

This article from the Huffington Post clearly establishes that all arrows point towards this being a missile attack against the Russian airliner.

The problem, as you just read, is ISIS "does not possess the specialized equipment necessary" to have done this, even with their "stolen" US weapons.

They would need surface-to-air missiles that could reach spectacular heights, or jets with launchable missiles -- and they have neither:

11/2: Russian Airline Rules Out Mechanical Failure in Crash

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/russia-plane-crash-mechanical-error-cause_56374122e4b0c66bae5ce0e5

ST. PETERSBURG, Russia (AP) — Only an external impact could have caused the crash of a Russian plane in Egypt that killed all 224 people on board, a top airline official said Monday, raising more questions about what exactly happened.

"We rule out a technical fault of the plane or a pilot error," said Alexander Smirnov, deputy general director of Metrojet. "The only possible explanation could be an external impact on the airplane."

But when pressed for more details about what type of impact and what could have caused it, Smirnov insisted that he was not at liberty to discuss details because the investigation was ongoing.

Viktor Yung, another deputy director general of Metrojet, said the crew did not send a distress call and they did not contact traffic controllers before the crash....

Smirnov also said the plane dropped 300 kph (186 mph) in speed and 1.5 kilometers (about 5,000 feet) in altitude one minute before it crashed into Egypt's Sinai Peninsula.

The Airbus A321-200 crashed in the Sinai 23 minutes after taking off from the Egyptian Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh en route to St. Petersburg.

Alexander Neradko, head of Russia's federal aviation agency, told reporters on Sunday that the large area over which plane debris fragments were found indicates the jet disintegrated while flying at high altitude.

He would not comment on any possible reason for the crash, citing the ongoing investigation.

THE SODA CAN BOMB

Double-check the wording of the Russian investigation above.

The only possible explanationof what could have brought the plane down was an external impact.

That would require weaponry that ISIS simply does not have, such as jet-launched missiles -- but which Western powers easily could have used and blamed on ISIS.

On Wednesday, November 18th, 2015, the mainstream media tried to wrap up the mystery by claiming ISIS destroyed the airliner with a home-made soda can bomb:

11/18: Did ISIS Use Soda Can Bomb To Bring Down Russian Plane?

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-isis-use-soda-can-bomb-to-bring-down-russian-plane/

If it was so easy to blow up a plane in mid-air with a single soda can, and get it through security, why did it take terrorists 14 years after 9/11 to do it?

And pineapple-flavored Schweppes? That's just gross.

The "Powers That Were" are hoping that most people will buy this story -- even though the Russians completely ruled out all explanations other than an external impact.

This means their investigation shows a projectile hit the plane from the outside, causing it to bend inward at the impact site.

A bomb from the inside would cause the hull to blow outward, bending the fragments in the opposite direction.

WHAT ABOUT TURKEY?

As of November 24th, the world is now well aware that Turkey shot down a Russian warplane wiping out whatever is left of ISIS.

This makes it far more likely that Turkey may have also shot down the Russian passenger airliner over Egypt.

Russia denies entering Turkish airspace at all. A leaked document shows that the decision to shoot down was based on only 17 seconds of time of allegedly crossing the border.

Really? Don't you guys think you might want to take a little more time and think this through?

Russia has now released video proof that their Su-24 fighter jet never crossed the border into Turkey. It was shot down in a wanton act of aggression.

The whole thing doesn't make any sense -- unless you consider that ISIS and Turkey are working together.

SECTION FOUR: THE MADNESS IS FINALLY COMING TO AN END

Date: 2015-12-11; view: 946