MINOR TERATA. 10 page enormous mammae. Goschler, quoted by Jacobson, speaks of a
well-developed man of twenty-two, with abundant hair on his chin and
suprapubic region and the scrotum apparently perfect, with median
rapine; a careful search failed to show any trace of a penis; on the
anterior wall of the rectum four lines above the anus was an orifice
which gave vent to urine; the right testicle and cord were normal, but
there was an acute orchitis in the left. Starting from just in front of
the anal orifice was a fold of skin 1 1/2 inches long and 3/4 inch high
continuous with the rapine, which seemed to be formed of erectile
tissue and which swelled under excitement, the enlargement lasting
several minutes with usually an emission from the rectum. It was
possible to pass a sound through the opening in the rectum to the
bladder through a urethra 1 1/2 inches wide; the patient had control of
the bladder and urinated from every three to five hours.
Many instances of rudimentary development of the penis have been
recorded, most of them complicated with cryptorchism or other
abnormality of the sexual organs. In other instances the organ is
present, but the infantile type is present all through life; sometimes
the subjects are weak in intellect and in a condition similar to
cretinism. Kaufmann quotes a case in a weakly boy of twelve whose penis
was but 3/4 inch long, about as thick as a goose-quill, and feeling as
limp as a mere tube of skin; the corpora cavernosa were not entirely
absent, but ran only from the ischium to the junction of the fixed
portion of the penis, suddenly terminating at this point. Nothing
indicative of a prostate could be found. The testicles were at the
entrance of the inguinal canal and the glans was only slightly
developed.
Binet speaks of a man of fifty-three whose external genitalia were of
the size of those of a boy of nine. The penis was of about the size of
the little finger, and contained on each side testicles not larger than
a pea. There was no hair on the pubes or the face, giving the man the
aspect of an old woman. The prostate was almost exterminated and the
seminal vesicles were very primitive in conformation. Wilson was
consulted by a gentleman of twenty-six as to his ability to perform the
marital function. In size his penis and testicles hardly exceeded those
of a boy of eight. He had never felt desire for sexual intercourse
until he became acquainted with his intended wife, since when he had
erections and nocturnal emissions. The patient married and became the
father of a family; those parts which at twenty-six were so much
smaller than usual had increased at twenty-eight to normal adult size.
There are three cases on record in the older literature of penises
extremely primitive in development. They are quoted by the Ephemerides,
Plater, Schenck, and Zacchias. The result in these cases was impotency.
In the Army and Medical Museum at Washington are two injected specimens
of the male organ divested of skin. From the meatus to the pubis they
measure 6 1/2 and 5 1/2 inches; from the extremity to the termination
of either crus 9 3/4 and 8 3/4 inches, and the circumferences are 4 3/4
and 4 1/4 inches. Between these two we can strike an average of the
size of the normal penis.
In some instances the penis is so large as to forbid coitus and even
inconvenience its possessor, measuring as much as ten or even more
inches in length. Extraordinary cases of large penis are reported by
Albinus (who mentions it as a cause for sterility), Bartholinus,
Fabricius Hildanus, Paullini, Peyer, Plater, Schurig, Sinibaldus, and
Zacchias. Several cases of enormous penises in the new-born have been
observed by Wolff and others.
The penis palme, or suture de la verge of the French, is the name given
to those examples of single cutaneous envelope for both the testicles
and penis; the penis is adherent to the scrotum by its inferior face;
the glans only is free and erection is impossible. Chretien cites an
instance in a man of twenty-five, and Schrumpf of Wesserling describes
an example of this rare anomaly. The penis and testes were inclosed in
a common sac, a slight projection not over 1/4 inch long being seen
from the upper part of this curious scrotum. When the child was a year
old a plastic operation was performed on this anomalous member with a
very satisfactory result. Petit describes an instance in which the
penis was slightly fused with the scrotum.
There are many varieties of torsion of the penis. The glans itself may
be inclined laterally, the curvature may be total, or there may be a
veritable rotation, bringing the inferior face above and the superior
face below. Gay describes a child with epispadias whose penis had
undergone such torsion on its axis that its inferior surface looked
upward to the left, and the child passed urine toward the left
shoulder. Follin mentions a similar instance in a boy of twelve with
complete epispadias, and Verneuil and Guerlin also record cases, both
complicated with associate maldevelopment. Caddy mentions a youth of
eighteen who had congenital torsion of the penis with out hypospadias
or epispadias. There was a complete half-turn to the left, so that the
slit-like urinary meatus was reversed and the frenum was above. Among
the older writers who describe incurvation or torsion of the penis are
Arantius, the Ephemerides, Haenel, Petit, Schurig, Tulpius, and
Zacchias.
Zacutus Lusitans speaks of torsion of the penis from freezing.
Paullini mentions a case the result of masturbation, and Hunter speaks
of torsion of the penis associated with arthritis.
Ossification of the Penis.--MacClellann speaks of a man of fifty-two
whose penis was curved and distorted in such a manner that urine could
not be passed without pain and coitus was impossible. A bony mass was
discovered in the septum between the corpora cavernosa; this was
dissected out with much hemorrhage and the upward curvature was
removed, but there resulted a slight inclination in the opposite
direction. The formation of bone and cartilage in the penis is quite
rare. Velpeau, Kauffmann, Lenhoseck, and Duploy are quoted by Jacobson
as having seen this anomaly. There is an excellent preparation in
Vienna figured by Demarquay, but no description is given. The
Ephemerides and Paullini describe osseous penises.
The complete absence of the frenum and prepuce has been observed in
animals but is very rare in man. The incomplete or irregular
development is more frequent, but most common is excessive development
of the prepuce, constituting phimosis, when there is abnormal adherence
with the glans. Instances of phimosis, being quite common, will be
passed without special mention. Deficient or absent prepuce has been
observed by Blasius, Marcellus Donatus, and Gilibert. Partial
deficiency is described by Petit Severinus, and others.
There may be imperforation or congenital occlusion of some portion of
the urethra, causing enormous accumulation of urine in the bladder, but
fortunately there is generally in such cases some anomalous opening of
the urethra giving vent to the excretions. Tulpius mentions a case of
deficient urethra. In the Ephemerides there is an account of a man who
had a constant flow of semen from an abnormal opening in the abdomen.
La Peyroma describes a case of impotence due to ejaculation of the
spermatic ducts into the bladder instead of into the urethra, but
remarks that there was a cicatrix of a wound of the neighboring parts.
There are a number of instances in which the urethra has terminated in
the rectum. Congenital dilatation of the urethral canal is very rare,
and generally accompanied by other malformation.
Duplication of the urethra or the existence of two permeable canals is
not accepted by all the authors, some of whom contend that one of the
canals either terminates in a culdesac or is not separate in itself.
Verneuil has published an article clearly exposing a number of cases,
showing that it is possible for the urethra to have two or more canals
which are distinct and have separate functions. Fabricius Hildanus
speaks of a double aperture to the urethra; Marcellus Donatus describes
duplicity of the urethra, one of the apertures being in the testicle;
and there is another case on record in which there was a urethral
aperture in the groin. A case of double urethra in a man of twenty-five
living in Styria who was under treatment for gonorrhea is described,
the supernumerary urethra opening above the natural one and receiving a
sound to the depth of 17 cm. There was purulent gonorrhea in both
urethrae. Vesalius has an account of a double urethral aperture, one of
which was supposed to give spermatic fluid and the other urine.
Borellus, Testa, and Cruveilhier have reported similar instances.
Instances of double penis have been discussed under the head of
diphallic terata, page 194.
Hypospadias and epispadias are names given to malformations of the
urethra in which the wall of the canal is deficient either above or
below. These anomalies are particularly interesting, as they are nearly
always found in male hermaphrodites, the fissure giving the appearance
of a vulva, as the scrotum is sometimes included, and even the perineum
may be fissured in continuity with the other parts, thus exaggerating
the deception. There seems to be an element of heredity in this
malformation, and this allegation is exemplified by Sedgwick, who
quotes a case from Heuremann in which a family of females had for
generations given birth to males with hypospadias. Belloc mentions a
man whose urethra terminated at the base of the frenum who had four
sons with the same deformity. Picardat mentions a father and son, both
of whom had double urethral orifices, one above the other, from one of
which issued urine and from the other semen--a fact that shows the
possibility of inheritance of this malformation. Patients in whom the
urethra opens at the root of the penis, the meatus being imperforate,
are not necessarily impotent; as, for instance, Fournier knew of a man
whose urethra opened posteriorly who was the father of four children.
Fournier supposed that the semen ejaculated vigorously and followed the
fissure on the back of the penis to the uterus, the membrane of the
vagina supplanting the deficient wall of the urethra. The penis was
short, but about as thick as ordinary.
Gray mentions a curious case in a man afflicted with hypospadias who,
suffering with delusions, was confined in the insane asylum at Utica.
When he determined to get married, fully appreciating his physical
defect, he resolved to imitate nature, and being of a very ingenious
turn of mind, he busied himself with the construction of an artificial
penis. While so engaged he had seized every opportunity to study the
conformation of this organ, and finally prepared a body formed of
cotton, six inches in length, and shaped like a penis, minus a prepuce.
He sheathed it in pig's gut and gave it a slight vermilion hue. To the
touch it felt elastic, and its shape was maintained by a piece of
gutta-percha tubing, around which the cotton was firmly wound. It was
fastened to the waist-band by means of straps, a central and an upper
one being so arranged that the penis could be thrown into an erect
position and so maintained. He had constructed a flesh-colored covering
which completely concealed the straps. With this artificial member he
was enabled to deceive his wife for fifteen months, and was only
discovered when; she undressed him while he was in a state of
intoxication. To further the deception he had told his wife immediately
after their marriage that it was quite indecent for a husband to
undress in the presence of his wife, and therefore she had always
retired first and turned out the light. Partly from fear that his
virile power would be questioned and partly from ignorance, the
duration of actual coitus would approach an hour. When the discovery
was made, his wife hid the instrument with which he had perpetrated a
most successful fraud upon her, and the patient subsequently attempted
coitus by contact with unsuccessful results, although both parties had
incomplete orgasms. Shortly afterward evidences of mental derangement
appeared and the man became the subject of exalted delusions. His wife,
at the time of report, had filed application for divorce. Haslam
reports a case in which loss of the penis was compensated for by the
use of an ivory succedaneum. Parallel instances of this kind have been
recorded by Ammann and Jonston.
Entire absence of the male sexual apparatus is extremely rare, but
Blondin and Velpeau have reported cases.
Complete absence of the testicles, or anorchism, is a comparatively
rare anomaly, and it is very difficult to distinguish between anorchism
and arrest of development, or simple atrophy, which is much more
common. Fisher of Boston describes the case of a man of forty-five, who
died of pneumonia. From the age of puberty to twenty-five, and even to
the day of death, his voice had never changed and his manners were
decidedly effeminate. He always sang soprano in concert with females.
After the age of twenty-five, however, his voice became more grave and
he could not accompany females with such ease. He had no beard, had
never shaved, and had never exhibited amorous propensities or desire
for female society. When about twenty-one he became associated with a
gay company of men and was addicted to the cup, but would never visit
houses of ill-fame. On dissection no trace of testicles could be found;
the scrotum was soft and flabby. The cerebellum was the exact size of
that of a female child.
Individuals with one testicle are called monorchids, and may be divided
into three varieties:--
(1) A solitary testicle divided in the middle by a deep fissure, the
two lobes being each provided with a spermatic cord on the same side as
the lobe.
(2) Testicles of the same origin, but with coalescence more general.
(3) A single testicle and two cords.
Gruber of St. Petersburg held a postmortem on a man in January, 1867,
in whom the right half of the scrotum, the right testicle, epididymis,
and the scrotal and inguinal parts of the right vas deferens were
absent. Gruber examined the literature for thirty years up to the time
of his report, and found 30 recorded postmortem examinations in which
there was absence of the testicle, and in eight of these both testicles
were missing. As a rule, natural eunuchs have feeble bodies, are
mentally dull, and live only a short time. The penis is ordinarily
defective and there is sometimes another associate malformation. They
are not always disinclined toward the opposite sex.
Polyorchids are persons who have more than two testicles. For a long
time the abnormality was not believed to exist, and some of the
observers denied the proof by postmortem examination of any of the
cases so diagnosed, but there is at present no doubt of the
fact,--three, four, and five testicles having been found at autopsies.
Russell, one of the older writers on the testicle, mentions a monk who
was a triorchid, and was so salacious that his indomitable passion
prevented him from keeping his vows of chastity. The amorous
propensities and generative faculties of polyorchids have always been
supposed greater than ordinary. Russell reports another case of a man
with a similar peculiarity, who was prescribed a concubine as a
reasonable allowance to a man thus endowed.
Morgagni and Meckel say that they never discovered a third testicle in
dissections of reputed triorchids, and though Haller has collected
records of a great number of triorchids, he has never been able to
verify the presence of the third testicle on dissection. Some authors,
including Haller, have demonstrated heredity in examples of
polyorchism. There is an old instance in which two testicles, one above
the other, were found on the right side and one on the left. Macann
describes a recruit of twenty, whose scrotum seemed to be much larger
on the right than on the left side, although it was not pendulous. On
dissection a right and left testicle were found in their normal
positions, but situated on the right side between the groin and the
normal testicle was a supernumerary organ, not in contact, and having a
separate and short cord. Prankard also describes a man with three
testicles. Three cases of triorchidism were found in recruits in the
British Army. Lane reports a supernumerary testis found in the right
half of the scrotum of a boy of fifteen. In a necropsy held on a man
killed in battle, Hohlberg discovered three fully developed testicles,
two on the right side placed one above the other. The London Medical
Record of 1884 quotes Jdanoff of St. Petersburg in mentioning a
soldier of twenty-one who had a supernumerary testicle erroneously
diagnosed as inguinal hernia. Quoted by the same reference, Bulatoff
mentions a soldier who had a third testicle, which diagnosis was
confirmed by several of his confreres. They recommended dismissal of
the man from the service, as the third testicle, usually resting in
some portion of the inguinal canal, caused extra exposure to traumatic
influence.
Venette gives an instance of four testicles, and Scharff, in the
Ephemerides, mentions five; Blasius mentions more than three testicles,
and, without citing proof, Buffon admits the possibility of such
occurrence and adds that such men are generally more vigorous.
Russell mentions four, five, and even six testicles in one individual;
all were not verified on dissection. He cites an instance of six
testicles four of which were of usual size and two smaller than
ordinary.
Baillie, the Ephemerides, and Schurig mention fusion of the testicles,
or synorchidism, somewhat after the manner of the normal disposition of
the batrachians and also the kangaroos, in the former of which the
fusion is abdominal and in the latter scrotal. Kerckring has a
description of an individual in whom the scrotum was absent.
In those cases in which the testicles are still in the abdominal cavity
the individuals are termed cryptorchids. Johnson has collected the
results of postmortem examinations of 89 supposed cryptorchids. In
eight of this number no testicles were found postmortem, the number
found in the abdomen was uncertain, but in 18 instances both testicles
were found in the inguinal canal, and in eight only one was found in
the inguinal canal, the other not appearing. The number in which the
semen was examined microscopically was 16, and in three spermatozoa
were found in the semen; one case was dubious, spermatozoa being found
two weeks afterward on a boy's shirt. The number having children was
ten. In one case a monorchid generated a cryptorchid child. Some of the
cryptorchids were effeminate, although others were manly with good
evidences of a beard. The morbid, hypochondriac, the voluptuous, and
the imbecile all found a place in Johnson's statistics; and although
there are evidences of the possession of the generative function,
still, we are compelled to say that the chances are against fecundity
of human cryptorchids. In this connection might be quoted the curious
case mentioned by Geoffroy-Saint-Hilaire, of a soldier who was hung for
rape. It was alleged that no traces of testicles were found externally
or internally yet semen containing spermatozoa was found in the seminal
vesicles. Spermatozoa have been found days and weeks after castration,
and the individuals during this period were capable of impregnation,
but in these cases the reservoirs were not empty, although the spring
had ceased to flow. Beigel, in Virchow's Archives, mentions a
cryptorchid of twenty-two who had nocturnal emissions containing
spermatozoa and who indulged in sexual congress. Partridge describes a
man of twenty-four who, notwithstanding his condition, gave evidences
of virile seminal flow.
In some cases there is anomalous position of the testicle. Hough
mentions an instance in which, from the great pain and sudden
appearance, a small tumor lying against the right pubic bone was
supposed to be a strangulated hernia. There were two well-developed
testicles in the scrotum, and the hernia proved to be a third. McElmail
describes a soldier of twenty-nine, who two or three months before
examination felt a pricking and slight burning pain near the internal
aperture of the internal inguinal canal, succeeded by a swelling until
the tumor passed into the scrotum. It was found in the upper part of
the scrotum above the original testicle, but not in contact, and was
about half the size of the normal testicle; its cord and epididymis
could be distinctly felt and caused the same sensation as pressure on
the other testicle did.
Marshall mentions a boy of sixteen in whom the right half of the
scrotum was empty, although the left was of normal size and contained a
testicle. On close examination another testicle was found in the
perineum; the boy said that while running he fell down, four years
before, and on getting up suffered great pain in the groin, and this
pain recurred after exertion. This testicle was removed successfully to
the scrotum. Horsley collected 20 instances of operators who made a
similar attempt, Annandale being the first one; his success was likely
due to antisepsis, as previously the testicles had always sloughed.
There is a record of a dog remarkable for its salacity who had two
testicles in the scrotum and one in the abdomen; some of the older
authors often indulged in playful humor on this subject.
Brown describes a child with a swelling in the perineum both painful
and elastic to the touch. The child cried if pressure was applied to
the tumor and there was every evidence that the tumor was a testicle.
Hutcheson, quoted by Russell, has given a curious case in an English
seaman who, as was the custom at that time, was impressed into service
by H.M.S. Druid in 1807 from a trading ship off the coast of Africa.
The man said he had been examined by dozens of ship-surgeons, but was
invariably rejected on account of rupture in both groins. The scrotum
was found to be an empty bag, and close examination showed that the
testicles occupied the seats of the supposed rupture. As soon as the
discovery was made the man became unnerved and agitated, and on
re-examining the parts the testicles were found in the scrotum. When
he found that there was no chance for escape he acknowledged that he
was an impostor and gave an exhibition in which, with incredible
facility, he pulled both testes up from the bottom of the scrotum to
the external abdominal ring. At the word of command he could pull up
one testicle, then another, and let them drop simultaneously; he
performed other like feats so rapidly that the movements could not be
distinguished.
In this connection Russell speaks of a man whose testicle was elevated
every time the east wind blew, which caused him a sense of languor and
relaxation; the same author describes a man whose testicles ascended
into the inguinal canal every time he was in the company of women.
Inversion of the testicle is of several varieties and quite rare, it
has been recognized by Sir Astley Cooper, Boyer, Maisonneuve, Royet,
and other writers.
The anomalies of the vas deferens and seminal vesicles are of little
interest and will be passed with mention of the case of Weber, who
found the seminal vesicles double; a similar conformation has been seen
in hermaphrodites.
CHAPTER VII.
Date: 2014-12-29; view: 529
|