PRENATAL ANOMALIES. 3 page the history of a woman who carried an infant in her womb for
twenty-nine months; this case may possibly belong under the head of
fetus long retained in the uterus.
Unconscious Pregnancy.--There are numerous instances of women who have
had experience in pregnancy unconsciously going almost to the moment of
delivery, yet experiencing none of the usual accompanying symptoms of
this condition. Crowell speaks of a woman of good social position who
had been married seven years, and who had made extensive preparations
for a long journey, when she was seized with a "bilious colic," and, to
her dismay and surprise, a child was born before the arrival of the
doctor summoned on account of her sudden colic and her inability to
retain her water. A peculiar feature of this case was the fact that
mental disturbance set in immediately afterward, and the mother became
morbid and had to be removed to an asylum, but recovered in a few
months. Tanner saw a woman of forty-two who had been suffering with
abdominal pains. She had been married three years and had never been
pregnant. Her catamenia were very scant, but this was attributed to her
change of life. She had conceived, had gone to the full term of
gestation, and was in labor ten hours without any suspicion of
pregnancy. She was successfully delivered of a girl, which occasioned
much rejoicing in the household.
Tasker of Kendall's Mills, Me., reports the case of a young married
woman calling him for bilious colic. He found the stomach slightly
distended and questioned her about the possibility of pregnancy. Both
she and her husband informed him that such could not be the case, as
her courses had been regular and her waist not enlarged, as she had
worn a certain corset all the time. There were no signs of quickening,
no change in the breasts, and, in fact, none of the usual signs of
pregnancy present. He gave her an opiate, and to her surprise, in about
six hours she was the mother of a boy weighing five pounds. Both the
mother and child made a good recovery. Duke cites the instance of a
woman who supposed that she was not pregnant up to the night of her
miscarriage. She had menstruated and was suckling a child sixteen
months old. During the night she was attacked with pains resembling
those of labor and a fetus slipped into the vagina without any
hemorrhage; the placenta came away directly afterward. In this peculiar
case the woman was menstruating regularly, suckling a child, and at the
same time was unconsciously pregnant.
Isham speaks of a case of unconscious pregnancy in which extremely
small twins were delivered at the eighth month. Fox cites an instance
of a woman who had borne eight children, and yet unconscious of
pregnancy. Merriman speaks of a woman forty years of age who had not
borne a child for nine years, but who suddenly gave birth to a stout,
healthy boy without being cognizant of pregnancy. Dayral tells of a
woman who carried a child all through pregnancy, unconscious of her
condition, and who was greatly surprised at its birth. Among the French
observers speaking of pregnancy remaining unrecognized by the mother
until the period of accouchement, Lozes and Rhades record peculiar
cases; and Mouronval relates an instance in which a woman who had borne
three children completely ignored the presence of pregnancy until the
pains of labor were felt. Fleishman and Munzenthaler also record
examples of unconscious pregnancy.
Pseudocyesis.--On the other hand, instances of pregnancy with imaginary
symptoms and preparations for birth are sometimes noticed, and many
cases are on record. In fact, nearly every text-book on obstetrics
gives some space to the subject of pseudocyesis. Suppression of the
menses, enlargement of the abdomen, engorgement of the breasts,
together with the symptoms produced by the imagination, such as nausea,
spasmodic contraction of the abdomen, etc., are for the most part the
origin of the cases of pseudocyesis. Of course, many of the cases are
not examples of true pseudocyesis, with its interesting phenomena, but
instances of malingering for mercenary or other purposes, and some are
calculated to deceive the most expert obstetricians by their tricks.
Weir Mitchell delineates an interesting case of pseudocyesis as
follows: "A woman, young, or else, it may be, at or past the
climacteric, eagerly desires a child or is horribly afraid of becoming
pregnant. The menses become slight in amount, irregular, and at last
cease or not. Meanwhile the abdomen and breasts enlarge, owing to a
rapid taking on of fat, and this is far less visible elsewhere. There
comes with this excess of fat the most profound conviction of the fact
of pregnancy. By and by the child is felt, the physician takes it for
granted, and this goes on until the great diagnostician, Time, corrects
the delusion. Then the fat disappears with remarkable speed, and the
reign of this singular simulation is at an end." In the same article,
Dr. Mitchell cites the two following cases under his personal
observation: "I was consulted by a lady in regard to a woman of thirty
years of age, a nurse in whom she was interested. This person had been
married some three years to a very old man possessed of a considerable
estate. He died, leaving his wife her legal share and the rest to
distant cousins, unless the wife had a child. For two months before he
died the woman, who was very anemic, ceased to menstruate. She became
sure that she was pregnant, and thereupon took on flesh at a rate and
in a way which seemed to justify her belief. Her breasts and abdomen
were the chief seats of this overgrowth. The menses did not return, her
pallor increased; the child was felt, and every preparation made for
delivery. At the eighth month a physician made an examination and
assured her of the absence of pregnancy. A second medical opinion
confirmed the first, and the tenth month found her of immense size and
still positive as to her condition. At the twelfth month her menstrual
flow returned, and she became sure it was the early sign of labor. When
it passed over she became convinced of her error, and at once dropped
weight at the rate of half a pound a day despite every effort to limit
the rate of this remarkable loss. At the end of two months she had
parted with fifty pounds and was, on the whole, less anemic. At this
stage I was consulted by letter, as the woman had become exceedingly
hysteric. This briefly stated case, which occurred many years ago, is a
fair illustration of my thesis.
"Another instance I saw when in general practice. A lady who had
several children and suffered much in her pregnancies passed five years
without becoming impregnated. Then she missed a period, and had, as
usual, vomiting. She made some wild efforts to end her supposed
pregnancy, and failing, acquiesced in her fate. The menses returned at
the ninth month and were presumed to mean labor. Meanwhile she vomited,
up to the eighth month, and ate little. Nevertheless, she took on fat
so as to make the abdomen and breasts immense and to excite unusual
attention. No physician examined her until the supposed labor began,
when, of course, the truth came out. She was pleased not to have
another child, and in her case, as in all the others known to me, the
fat lessened as soon as the mind was satisfied as to the non-existence
of pregnancy. As I now recall the facts, this woman was not more than
two months in getting rid of the excess of adipose tissue. Dr. Hirst
tells me he has met with cases of women taking on fat with cessation of
the menses, and in which there was also a steady belief in the
existence of pregnancy. He has not so followed up these cases as to
know if in them the fat fell away with speed when once the patient was
assured that no child existed within her."
Hirst, in an article on the difficulties in the diagnosis of pregnancy,
gives several excellent photographs showing the close resemblance
between several pathologic conditions and the normal distention of the
abdomen in pregnancy. A woman who had several children fell sick with a
chest-affection, followed by an edema. For fifteen months she was
confined to her bed, and had never had connection with her husband
during that time. Her menses ceased; her mammae became engorged and
discharged a serous lactescent fluid; her belly enlarged, and both she
and her physician felt fetal movements in her abdomen. As in her
previous pregnancies, she suffered nausea. Naturally, a suspicion as to
her virtue came into her husband's mind, but when he considered that
she had never left her bed for fifteen months he thought the pregnancy
impossible. Still the wife insisted that she was pregnant and was
confirmed in the belief by a midwife. The belly continued to increase,
and about eleven months after the cessation of the menses she had the
pains of labor. Three doctors and an accoucheur were present, and when
they claimed that the fetal head presented the husband gave up in
despair; but the supposed fetus was born shortly after, and proved to
be only a mass of hydatids, with not the sign of a true pregnancy.
Girard of Lyons speaks of a female who had been pregnant several times,
but again experienced the signs of pregnancy. Her mammae were engorged
with a lactescent fluid, and she felt belly-movements like those of a
child; but during all this time she had regular menstruation. Her
abdomen progressively increased in size, and between the tenth and
eleventh months she suffered what she thought to be labor-pains. These
false pains ceased upon taking a bath, and with the disappearance of
the other signs was dissipated the fallacious idea of pregnancy.
There is mentioned an instance of medicolegal interest of a young girl
who showed all the signs of pregnancy and confessed to her parents that
she had had commerce with a man. The parents immediately prosecuted the
seducer by strenuous legal methods, but when her ninth month came, and
after the use of six baths, all the signs of pregnancy vanished. Harvey
cites several instances of pseudocyesis, and says we must not rashly
determine of the the inordinate birth before the seventh or after the
eleventh month. In 1646 a woman, after having laughed heartily at the
jests of an ill-bred, covetous clown, was seized with various movements
and motions in her belly like those of a child, and these continued for
over a month, when the courses appeared again and the movements ceased.
The woman was certain that she was pregnant.
The most noteworthy historic case of pseudocyesis is that of Queen Mary
of England, or "Bloody Mary," as she was called. To insure the
succession of a Catholic heir, she was most desirous of having a son by
her consort, Philip, and she constantly prayed and wished for
pregnancy. Finally her menses stopped; the breasts began to enlarge
and became discolored around the nipples. She had morning-sickness of a
violent nature and her abdomen enlarged. On consultation with the
ladies of her court, her opinion of pregnancy was strongly confirmed.
Her favorite amusement then was to make baby-clothes and count on her
fingers the months of pregnancy. When the end of the ninth month
approached, the people were awakened one night by the joyous peals of
the bells of London announcing the new heir. An ambassador had been
sent to tell the Pope that Mary could feel the new life within her, and
the people rushed to St. Paul's Cathedral to listen to the venerable
Archbishop of Canterbury describe the baby-prince and give thanks for
his deliverance. The spurious labor pains passed away, and after being
assured that no real pregnancy existed in her case, Mary went into
violent hysterics, and Philip, disgusted with the whole affair,
deserted her; then commenced the persecution of the Protestants, which
blighted the reign.
Putnam cites the case of a healthy brunet, aged forty, the mother of
three children. She had abrupt vertical abdominal movements, so strong
as to cause her to plunge and sway from side to side. Her breasts were
enlarged, the areolae dark, and the uterus contained an elastic tumor,
heavy and rolling under the hand. Her abdomen progressively enlarged to
the regular size of matured gestation; but the extrauterine pregnancy,
which was supposed to have existed, was not seen at the autopsy,
nothing more than an enlarged liver being found. The movement was due
to spasmodic movements of the abdominal muscles, the causes being
unknown. Madden gives the history of a primipara of twenty-eight,
married one year, to whom he was called. On entering the room he was
greeted by the midwife, who said she expected the child about 8 P.M.
The woman was lying in the usual obstetric position, on the left side,
groaning, crying loudly, and pulling hard at a strap fastened to the
bed-post. She had a partial cessation of menses, and had complained of
tumultuous movements of the child and overflow of milk from the
breasts. Examination showed the cervix low down, the os small and
circular, and no signs of pregnancy in the uterus. The abdomen was
distended with tympanites and the rectum much dilated with accumulated
feces. Dr. Madden left her, telling her that she was not pregnant, and
when she reappeared at his office in a few days, he reassured her of
the nonexistence of pregnancy; she became very indignant, triumphantly
squeezed lactescent fluid from her breasts, and, insisting that she
could feel fetal movements, left to seek a more sympathetic accoucheur.
Underhill, in the words of Hamilton, describes a woman as "having
acquired the most accurate description of the breeding symptoms, and
with wonderful facility imagined that she had felt every one of them."
He found the woman on a bed complaining of great labor-pains, biting a
handkerchief, and pulling on a cloth attached to her bed. The finger on
the abdomen or vulva elicited symptoms of great sensitiveness. He told
her she was not pregnant, and the next day she was sitting up, though
the discharge continued, but the simulated throes of labor, which she
had so graphically pictured, had ceased.
Haultain gives three examples of pseudocyesis, the first with no
apparent cause, the second due to carcinoma of the uterus, while in the
third there was a small fibroid in the anterior wall of the uterus.
Some cases are of purely nervous origin, associated with a purely
muscular distention of the abdomen. Clay reported a case due to
ascites. Cases of pseudocyesis in women convicted of murder are not
uncommon, though most of them are imposters hoping for an extra lease
of life.
Croon speaks of a child seven years old on whom he performed ovariotomy
for a round-celled sarcoma. She had been well up to May, but since then
she had several times been raped by a boy, in consequence of which she
had constant uterine hemorrhage. Shortly after the first coitus her
abdomen began to enlarge, the breasts to develop, and the areolae to
darken. In seven months the abdomen presented the signs of pregnancy,
but the cervix was soft and patulous; the sound entered three inches
and was followed by some hemorrhage. The child was well developed, the
mons was covered with hair, and all the associate symptoms tended to
increase the deception.
Sympathetic Male Nausea of Pregnancy.--Associated with pregnancy there
are often present morning-nausea and vomiting as prominent and reliable
symptoms. Vomiting is often so excessive as to be provocative of most
serious issue and even warranting the induction of abortion. This fact
is well known and has been thoroughly discussed, but with it is
associated an interesting point, the occasional association of the same
symptoms sympathetically in the husband. The belief has long been a
superstition in parts of Great Britain, descending to America, and even
exists at the present day. Sir Francis Bacon has written on this
subject, the substance of his argument being that certain loving
husbands so sympathize with their pregnant wives that they suffer
morning-sickness in their own person. No less an authority than S. Weir
Mitchell called attention to the interesting subject of sympathetic
vomiting in the husband in his lectures on nervous maladies some years
ago. He also quotes the following case associated with pseudocyesis:--
"A woman had given birth to two female children. Some years passed and
her desire for a boy was ungratified. Then she missed her flow once,
and had thrice after this, as always took place with her when pregnant,
a very small but regular loss. At the second month morning-vomiting
came on as usual with her. Meanwhile she became very fat, and as the
growth was largely, in fact excessively, abdominal, she became easily
sure of her condition. She was not my patient, but her husband
consulted me as to his own morning-sickness, which came on with the
first occurrence of this sign in his wife, as had been the case twice
before in her former pregnancies. I advised him to leave home, and this
proved effectual. I learned later that the woman continued to gain
flesh and be sick every morning until the seventh month. Then
menstruation returned, an examination was made, and when sure that
there was no possibility of her being pregnant she began to lose flesh,
and within a few months regained her usual size."
Hamill reports an instance of morning-sickness in a husband two weeks
after the appearance of menstruation in the wife for the last time. He
had daily attacks, and it was not until the failure of the next menses
that the woman had any other sign of pregnancy than her husband's
nausea. His nausea continued for two months, and was the same as that
which he had suffered during his wife's former pregnancies, although
not until both he and his wife became aware of the existence of
pregnancy. The Lancet describes a case in which the husband's nausea
and vomiting, as well as that of the wife, began and ended
simultaneously. Judkins cites an instance of a man who was sick in the
morning while his wife was carrying a child. This occurred during every
pregnancy, and the man related that his own father was similarly
affected while his mother was in the early months of pregnancy with
him, showing an hereditary predisposition.
The perverted appetites and peculiar longings of pregnant women furnish
curious matter for discussion. From the earliest times there are many
such records. Borellus cites an instance, and there are many others, of
pregnant women eating excrement with apparent relish. Tulpius, Sennert,
Langius, van Swieten, a Castro, and several others report depraved
appetites. Several writers have seen avidity for human flesh in such
females. Fournier knew a woman with an appetite for the blood of her
husband. She gently cut him while he lay asleep by her side and sucked
blood from the wounds--a modern "Succubus." Pare mentions the perverted
appetites of pregnant women, and says that they have been known to eat
plaster, ashes, dirt, charcoal, flour, salt, spices, to drink pure
vinegar, and to indulge in all forms of debauchery. Plot gives the case
of a woman who would gnaw and eat all the linen off her bed. Hufeland's
Journal records the history of a case of a woman of thirty-two, who had
been married ten years, who acquired a strong taste for charcoal, and
was ravenous for it. It seemed to cheer her and to cure a supposed
dyspepsia. She devoured enormous quantities, preferring hard-wood
charcoal. Bruyesinus speaks of a woman who had a most perverted
appetite for her own milk, and constantly drained her breasts;
Krafft-Ebing cites a similar case. Another case is that of a pregnant
woman who had a desire for hot and pungent articles of food, and who in
a short time devoured a pound of pepper. Scheidemantel cites a case in
which the perverted appetite, originating in pregnancy, became
permanent, but this is not the experience of most observers. The
pregnant wife of a farmer in Hassfort-on-the-Main ate the excrement of
her husband.
Many instances could be quoted, some in which extreme cases of
polydipsia and bulimia developed; these can be readily attributed to
the increased call for liquids and food. Other cases of diverse new
emotions can be recalled, such as lasciviousness, dirty habits,
perverted thoughts, and, on the other hand, extreme piety, chastity,
and purity of the mind. Some of the best-natured women are when
pregnant extremely cross and irritable and many perversions of
disposition are commonly noticed in pregnancy. There is often a
longing for a particular kind of food or dish for which no noticeable
desire had been displayed before.
Maternal Impressions.--Another curious fact associated with pregnancy
is the apparent influence of the emotions of the mother on the child in
utero. Every one knows of the popular explanation of many birth-marks,
their supposed resemblance to some animal or object seen by the mother
during pregnancy, etc. The truth of maternal impressions, however,
seems to be more firmly established by facts of a substantial nature.
There is a natural desire to explain any abnormality or anomaly of the
child as due to some incident during the period of the mother's
pregnancy, and the truth is often distorted and the imagination heavily
drawn upon to furnish the satisfactory explanation. It is the customary
speech of the dime-museum lecturer to attribute the existence of some
"freak" to an episode in the mother's pregnancy. The poor
"Elephant-man" firmly believed his peculiarity was due to the fact that
his mother while carrying him in utero was knocked down at the circus
by an elephant. In some countries the exhibition of monstrosities is
forbidden because of the supposed danger of maternal impression. The
celebrated "Siamese Twins" for this reason were forbidden to exhibit
themselves for quite a period in France.
We shall cite only a few of the most interesting cases from medical
literature. Hippocrates saved the honor of a princess, accused of
adultery with a negro because she bore a black child, by citing it as a
case of maternal impression, the husband of the princess having placed
in her room a painting of a negro, to the view of which she was
subjected during the whole of her pregnancy. Then, again, in the
treatise "De Superfoetatione" there occurs the following distinct
statement: "If a pregnant woman has a longing to eat earth or coals,
and eats of them, the infant which is born carries on its head the mark
of these things." This statement, however, occurs in a work which is
not mentioned by any of the ancient authorities, and is rejected by
practically all the modern ones; according to Ballantyne, there is,
therefore, no absolute proof that Hippocrates was a believer in one of
the most popular and long-persisting beliefs concerning fetal
deformities.
In the explanation of heredity, Hippocrates states "that the body of
the male as well as that of the female furnishes the semen. That which
is weak (unhealthy) is derived from weak (unhealthy) parts, that which
is strong (healthy) from strong (healthy) parts, and the fetus will
correspond to the quality of the semen. If the semen of one part come
in greater quantity from the male than from the female, this part will
resemble more closely the father; if, however, it comes more from the
female, the part will rather resemble the mother. If it be true that
the semen comes from both parents, then it is impossible for the whole
body to resemble either the mother or the father, or neither the one
nor the other in anything, but necessarily the child will resemble both
the one and the other in something. The child will most resemble the
one who contributes most to the formation of the parts." Such was the
Hippocratic theory of generation and heredity, and it was ingeniously
used to explain the hereditary nature of certain diseases and
malformations. For instance, in speaking of the sacred disease
(epilepsy), Hippocrates says: "Its origin is hereditary, like that of
other diseases; for if a phlegmatic person be born of a phlegmatic, and
a bilious of a bilious, and a phthisical of a phthisical, and one
having spleen disease of another having disease of the spleen, what is
to hinder it from happening that where the father and mother were
subject to this disease certain of their offspring should be so
affected also? As the semen comes from all parts of the body, healthy
particles will come from healthy parts, and unhealthy from unhealthy
parts."
According to Pare, Damascene saw a girl with long hair like a bear,
whose mother had constantly before her a picture of the hairy St. John.
Pare also appends an illustration showing the supposed resemblance to a
bear. Jonston quotes a case of Heliodorus; it was an Ethiopian, who by
the effect of the imagination produced a white child. Pare describes
this case more fully: "Heliodorus says that Persina, Queen of Ethiopia,
being impregnated by Hydustes, also an Ethiopian, bore a daughter with
a white skin, and the anomaly was ascribed to the admiration that a
picture of Andromeda excited in Persina throughout the whole of the
pregnancy." Van Helmont cites the case of a tailor's wife at Mechlin,
who during a conflict outside her house, on seeing a soldier lose his
hand at her door, gave birth to a daughter with one hand, the other
hand being a bleeding stump; he also speaks of the case of the wife of
a merchant at Antwerp, who after seeing a soldier's arm shot off at the
siege of Ostend gave birth to a daughter with one arm. Plot speaks of a
child bearing the figure of a mouse; when pregnant, the mother had been
much frightened by one of these animals. Gassendus describes a fetus
with the traces of a wound in the same location as one received by the
mother. The Lancet speaks of several cases--one of a child with a face
resembling a dog whose mother had been bitten; one of a child with one
eye blue and the other black, whose mother during confinement had seen
a person so marked; of an infant with fins as upper and lower
extremities, the mother having seen such a monster; and another, a
child born with its feet covered with scalds and burns, whose mother
had been badly frightened by fireworks and a descending rocket. There
is the history of a woman who while pregnant at seven months with her
fifth child was bitten on the right calf by a dog. Ten weeks after, she
bore a child with three marks corresponding in size and appearance to
those caused by the dog's teeth on her leg. Kerr reports the case of a
Date: 2014-12-29; view: 651
|