![]() CATEGORIES: BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism |
Intending to make a decision, but they needed moreinformation, to which they're entitled. Ron: I've got an expert on commercial lease transactions who'll testify that Jones had sufficient information to make A decision. Sam: That sounds good. But you still need to reinforce the Idea that the withholding was somehow intentional or Deliberate. Ron: Yes, I'm working on that now. I'm collecting evidence that suggests the relationship between the men wasn't a good One. Sam: Good. Keep me posted, Ron- and let me know if I can Help at all. Ron: Thanks, will do! Listening 2 Ron: In determining whether a landlord has unreasonably Refused to consent to an assignment, the court should consider only those factors that relate to the landlord's Interest in preserving the value of the property, and the court Must evaluate whether a reasonably prudent person in the landlord's position would have also refused to consent. Arbitrary considerations of personal taste, convenience or Sensibility are not proper criteria for withholding consent Under such a lease provision. The court must determine the credibility of witnesses and The weight to be given to evidence and draw all justifiable Inferences of fact from the evidence. Here, when my client informed the defendant that he had a prospective buyer for his business, the defendant's lawyer Requested that he provide personal and financial information On the buyer, as well as a business plan and evidence of the buyer's experience in operating a restaurant. The defendant's lawyer also provided my client with a commercial Lease application for the buyer to complete. My client gave The defendant the completed application and information on The buyer and promptly responded to each of the defendant's requests for information. As acknowledged by the defendant's lawyer, the proposed buyer had a 'perfect credit rating'. If the credit rating was 'perfect', then on what grounds did the defendant withhold approval? Surely not on reasonable grounds. My client's Expert on commercial lease transactions, whom the court Must find persuasive, testified that my client provided enough Information for the defendant to make a decision. If the Amount of information provided was sufficient, then on what grounds did the defendant delay making a decision? Surely Not on reasonable grounds. Furthermore, there was evidence that the defendant's delay in approving the assignment was E Audio transcripts not related to the buyer's qualifications, but was predicated On a dispute with my client involving a prior lawsuit between The parties. This evidence - a letter in which the defendant threatens to 'ruin' my client - makes it clear on which grounds the defendant withheld approval: on unreasonable Grounds. The defendant lost the lawsuit and was required to Payhigh damagesto my client - this is the explanationfor its Unreasonable withholding of approval. Based on the evidence presented, the court must conclude That sufficient evidence supports a determination that the Date: 2015-12-11; view: 784
|