Intending to make a decision, but they needed moreinformation, to which they're entitled.
Ron: I've got an expert on commercial lease transactions
who'll testify that Jones had sufficient information to make
A decision.
Sam: That sounds good. But you still need to reinforce the
Idea that the withholding was somehow intentional or
Deliberate.
Ron: Yes, I'm working on that now. I'm collecting evidence that
suggests the relationship between the men wasn't a good
One.
Sam: Good. Keep me posted, Ron- and let me know if I can
Help at all.
Ron: Thanks, will do!
Listening 2
Ron: In determining whether a landlord has unreasonably
Refused to consent to an assignment, the court should
consider only those factors that relate to the landlord's
Interest in preserving the value of the property, and the court
Must evaluate whether a reasonably prudent person in the
landlord's position would have also refused to consent.
Arbitrary considerations of personal taste, convenience or
Sensibility are not proper criteria for withholding consent
Under such a lease provision.
The court must determine the credibility of witnesses and
The weight to be given to evidence and draw all justifiable
Inferences of fact from the evidence.
Here, when my client informed the defendant that he had a
prospective buyer for his business, the defendant's lawyer
Requested that he provide personal and financial information
On the buyer, as well as a business plan and evidence of the
buyer's experience in operating a restaurant. The
defendant's lawyer also provided my client with a commercial
Lease application for the buyer to complete. My client gave
The defendant the completed application and information on
The buyer and promptly responded to each of the
defendant's requests for information.
As acknowledged by the defendant's lawyer, the proposed
buyer had a 'perfect credit rating'. If the credit rating was
'perfect', then on what grounds did the defendant withhold
approval? Surely not on reasonable grounds. My client's
Expert on commercial lease transactions, whom the court
Must find persuasive, testified that my client provided enough
Information for the defendant to make a decision. If the
Amount of information provided was sufficient, then on what
grounds did the defendant delay making a decision? Surely
Not on reasonable grounds. Furthermore, there was evidence
that the defendant's delay in approving the assignment was
E Audio transcripts
not related to the buyer's qualifications, but was predicated
On a dispute with my client involving a prior lawsuit between
The parties. This evidence - a letter in which the defendant
threatens to 'ruin' my client - makes it clear on which
grounds the defendant withheld approval: on unreasonable
Grounds. The defendant lost the lawsuit and was required to
Payhigh damagesto my client - this is the explanationfor its
Unreasonable withholding of approval.
Based on the evidence presented, the court must conclude
That sufficient evidence supports a determination that the
Date: 2015-12-11; view: 704
|