23The article is divided into three parts. Readthe three headings. Which of the three
sections do you think primarily contains opinions and attitudes?
24Look at the first section of the text. Underline the explanation of how employment
tribunals work, as well as the four adjectives describing the new arbitration scheme.
25Read the whole text. Whose opinions of the arbitration procedure are reported? Why
does the writer describe the introduction of the new scheme as ironic?
Key features of the scheme
There are significant differences between the new arbitration scheme and the conventional
employment-tribunal process. The key features of the ACASarbitration scheme are as follows: . The scheme is entirely voluntary and is available only in respect of unfair dismissal claims. It
can be used only where both parties agree to it and waive certain rights they would have at an
employment tribunal. . Hearings will be held in private in such places as an ACASoffice or a hotel and will normally
be completed within half a day. Written statements of their case may be submitted by the
parties in advance. .The case will be heard by an experienced arbitrator, chosen by ACAS, not the parties
. themselves. Legal representatives may be used by the parties. There is no set format for the hearing. Arbitrators have a general duty to act fairly and impartially
between the parties, giving each party a reasonable opportunity to pleadhis or her case and
respond to that of the other party. The process is intended to be 'inquisitorial' or 'investigative',
. rather than adversarial as in tribunal hearings - no cross-examination will take place. Each party covers their own costs in attending the hearing. However, if a dismissal is found to
be unfair, the arbitrator can include in the calculation of any compensation a sum to cover
. the costs incurred by the employee in attending the hearing. Arbitrators are required to apply EC law and the Human Rights Acts 1998 (on which a legal
adviser may be appointed to provide guidance), but otherwise, instead of applying strict legal
tests and case law, the arbitrator's decision will have regard to 'general principles of fairness
and good conduct in employment relations'.
. As with unfair dismissal cases determined by an employment tribunal, reinstatement, reengagement
and compensation are the available remedies if the dismissal is not upheld.
Unlike tribunal cases, however, the award is confidential to ACASand the parties, and the
. arbitrator's decision will be final and binding. There is only very limited scope for appealing or challenging the arbitrator's award.
,
Commentary
It remains to be seen what impact the new arrangements will have. Lawyers and other
commentators are uncertain about the merits and likely attractiveness of the new scheme. Some
have expressed concern that, because the criteria for arbitrators' decisions ('general principles of
fairness and good conduct in employment relations') differ from the statutory tests applied by the
tribunals, a 'two-tier' system of justice may develop. It has also been suggested that the arbitration
scheme offers employers and employees less certainty of outcome, and that the confidentiality of
awards may mask variable standards within the arbitration scheme.
Some lawyers think that the confidentiality of proceedings under the arbitration scheme may be a
significant attraction to employers who want to avoid the damaging publicity sometimes
associated with tribunal cases. Conversely, however, some lawyers predict that the fact that the
process is private may make arbitration less attractive to dismissed employees. According to this
view, arbitration lacks the 'embarrassment value' of public tribunal hearings which may lead to
favourable out-of-court settlements for dismissed employees. The limited grounds for appealing
against an arbitrator's decision are considered a disadvantage for employers.
The irony of the new arbitration scheme is that employment tribunals were themselves intended
as an 'easily accessible, informal, speedy and inexpensive' alternative to the ordinary courts for
dealing with individual employment disputes when the UK's unfair dismissals legislation was
first introduced 30 years ago.
26Read the article again and decide whether these statements are true or false.
1 Arbitration is intended to be faster and less formal than the traditional
process of resolving employment disputes.
2 In the arbitration scheme, parties will not be questioned by the other party's
representative.
3 In reaching a decision, an arbitrator is obliged to apply case law and legal
tests.
4 Some lawyers fear that arbitration will lead to double standards in the
resolution of employment disputes.
5 The confidentiality of arbitration appeals to those who have been dismissed
from work, as it causes less embarrassment.
6 Employers regard the fact that it is difficult to appeal a decision made by an
arbitrator to be a considerable advantage of the arbitration system.
27Match these adjectives from the text (1-5) with their synonyms (a-e).
1 voluntary
2 key
3 vast
4 confidential
5 conventional
a huge
b traditional
c private
d important
e optional
28Match these verbs (1-6) with their definitions (a-f). The verbs are in italics in
the article.
1 to waive a to formally request that a decision of an inferior body be
reviewed by a superior one
b to argue a case in court
c to give something up
d to make use of something (when deciding a case)
e to question something
f to listen to a case at a relatively formal proceeding
2 to hear
3 to plead
4 to apply
5 to appeal
6 to challenge
Unit8 Employment law
E
29Match the verbs (1-6) with the nouns in the box that they collocate with in the
article. Some of the nouns go with more than one verb.
I an award
a law a case rights
1 to hear
2 to waive
3 to plead
Can you add any more?
4 to apply
5 to appeal
6 to challenge
30How does the arbitration procedure described in the text compare with the
arbitration system used for handling employment disputes in your jurisdiction?
ng on
in el l
A lawyer has received a request from a client who employs a large number of people and
has to deal with employment rights disputes on a regular basis. The client has asked for
general information about the arbitration process described in Reading 4 in a short, easyto-
understand memo. He wants to know how it compares with employment tribunals, and
what the advantages and disadvantages are of arbitration from the point of view of an
employer.
31Read this email, written in response to the above request. Some of the
information it contains is incorrect. Find three factual mistakes and correct them.
Dear Mr Mason
In your email of 9 April, you asked for information concerning the new arbitration procedure. You
specifically requested an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration from the
point of view of an employer. The following summary presents a selection of key features of both
the new arbitration scheme and the existing employment tribunal process.
Speed: Unlike hearings held before an employment tribunal, the new procedure can be
completed faster, usually in one week. This is clearly advantageous for an employer, as it would
save a great deal of time and money.
Confidentiality: In contrast to the public hearings held by employment tribunals, the new
arbitration process is conducted in a private setting, such as a hotel, and is completely
confidential. This prevents an employer from getting the unwanted bad publicity that often
accompanies public proceedings. A further advantage of confidentiality from the point of view
of an employer is the fact that high out-of-court settlements for employees (which are typically
reached in order to avoid the embarrassment of public proceedings) are thus much less likely.
Appeals: Both the decisions of an employment tribunal and those reached in arbitration can be
appealed. Naturally, this can be regarded as a significant advantage for an employer.
On balance, I would say that the new arbitration scheme is attractive from the point of view of an
employer, and I recommend that you consider making use of this new process to deal with all kinds
of employment disputes.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like further information. I have attached an
article about this topic to this email which may be of interest to you.
Yours sincerely
Elisabeth Stephens
,
32When comparing complex ideas in a clear and simple way, it is advisable to
decide on an overall organising principle. Generally speaking, two approaches
to organising ideas are available to the writer:
A Listing and explaining the advantages and disadvantages of one system and
then the other;
B Choosing key points - such as confidentiality - and discussing each system
in respect of these criteria.
1 Which method of organising a comparison is used in the email you have just
read?
2 Which sentence in the email announces the organising principle to the
reader at the beginning of the text?
3 Underline the phrases in the email which are used to compare and contrast.
4 Which phrases are used to point out advantages?
33Rewrite the email on page 116 using method A to organise the information.
SAMP~E Correct the factual mistakes and make use of some of the following phrases ANSWER
»P.294 for comparing and indicating advantages/disadvantages:
X has a number of advantages, such as ...
However, it also has some disadvantages/drawbacks ...
X differs from / is different from Y with regard to / in respect of ...
The first system / The former has the advantage/disadvantage of being ... ,
while the second system / the latter has the benefit/drawback of being ...
D
(~\ Unit 8
To improve your web-based research skills, visit www.cambridge.org/elt/legalenglish.click on
Research Tasks and choose Task 8.
Unit 8 Employment law E
Vocabulary: distinguishing meaningWhich word in each group is the odd one
out? You may need to consult a dictionary to distinguish the differences
dismissal redundancy
prohibit forbid
3 solely exclusively primarily only
4 confidential certain private secret
5 essential key conventional important
6 speedy fast vast swift
Adjective formationAdd the prefixes in-, non- or
to form its opposite. The words marked with * have more
form.
layoff
1 attractive
2 certain
3 confidential
4 conventional *
5 discriminatory
6 fair
7 lawfUl
8 necessary
9 reasonable
10specific*
11voluntary
WordcboiceThese senteflt:esarepaxt
1996. In each case, choQsetM t:6rrecLwqrq or
1 An employee who waives
the end of her maternity leave period shall
than seven days' information / /
intends to return.
2 If an employee attempts to
maternity leave period with,
subsection 1, her employer shall be
postpone her return to a date s
that he has seven days' notice
3 An employer is not entitled to /
employee's return to work to
period.
Use ofpr~positions Complete the senteqces below using the prepositions in
the box. The sentences are taken from the texts in this Lln.it.
against against
to under via
from
with
from in of off on on to
1 It is unlawful for a person to discriminate another based on sex or
marital status the hiring process and in respect of the terms and
conditions of employment.
2 After the employee hired, protection is generally provided the
Employment Rights Act 1996.
3 A voluntary arbitration procedure unfair dismissal cases is available
employers and employees as an alternative the
traditional way of resolving such cases employment tribunals.
4 Solicitors employment law cases being brought
5 The employees sex
discrimination and pervading the firm
prevented women senior partners.
6 The or five
years
7 grounds
awarded
incurred
decide heard includes
issue
dismisscd file
pay resembles
goes
'If you you can
2)employment
tribunal. A It hears
to
a hearing,
6)qualified legal and two non-legally
qualified who may have experience as employers or union
representatives, for example. whether your
dismissal was unfair or not. If your case is successful, the tribunal will also
decide whether compensation should be 8), and if so, how much.
The tribunal or the
by the other
party.'
,--9~r
Saleofgoods
Reading 1: Introduction to sale of goods
legislation
The following text gives an overview of the area of law which relates to the sale of goods.
This can relate to a wide variety of transactions, from buying something tangible in a
shop or on the Internet to paying for a service, such as repairs.
1 Read through the text quickly and complete the sentences below using the
words in the box.
contracts disclaimers exclusions title transfer warranties
1 A sale can be defined as the of in a good.
2 Implied do not need to be expressed as they are implied by law.
3 Twomeans of limiting warranty liability are and .
4 The CISGsets forth rules that govern .. for the internationalsale of goods.
The sale of goods entails a broad area of the lawwhich is largelygoverned by legislation. Where
an aspect of the law is not regulated by legislption, it is governedby the commOnlaw or often by
general principles of laWl:nnOQ.,~pmmQ.Iia\1w
The applicable legislationsets forth the nature of what is involvedin the sale of goods. Naturally,
this includes definitionsof what constitutes a sale and goodsl. Asale entails the transfer of title in
a good fromthe seller to the buyer.Goods can be defined broadlyas some type of tangible chattel.
Applicationof the legislation depends upon: the type sale}whether the mercbant or