Different market forms

To begin with let’s just think about just what a market is. A market consists of all the (potential) buyers and sellers of a particular good or service.

In order for a market to exist, though, these potential buyers and sellers must have some way to communicate offers to buy and sell with one another. Thus, it is natural to identify a market with the place where traders come together (as in the case of a stock market) or the means by which they communicate.

One possibility is for them to come together and yell at one another (as at the New York Stock Exchange). In traditional societies, craftsmen in a particular trade may all be located on the same street, so that customers know where to go to buy. Of course, many modern markets make use of a wide range of electronic communication methods, as do NASDAQ and the international currency markets.

To sum it up if we talk about a market we always mention the following things:

- buyers, sellers;

- commodity;

- price setting;

- forms of competition.

All this characteristics may vary for different markets. At the same time it could be similarities for some markets. This is the ground to construct some ideal model of the market. These models are called forms of markets (other name types of market structures).

Economists in general recognize four major types of market:

• "Perfect Competition"

• Monopoly

• Oligopoly

• Monopolistic competition
46 P-Competition

What many economists call "Perfect Competition" is an idealized model of the market (structure of an industry) in which price competition is dominant – in fact the only form of competition possible. The terminology "Perfect Competition" is quite common but not quite universal. The term "Pure Competition" is also sometimes used.

A P-Competitive structure is defined by four characteristics. For an industry to have a P-competitive structure, it must have all four of these characteristics:

1) Many buyers and sellers

The idea is that the sellers and buyers are small relative to the size of the market, so that no one of them can "fix the price." If there are "many small sellers," it makes it much harder for any seller or any group of sellers to "rig the price". Similarly, if there are "many small buyers," there is little opportunity for buyers to "rig the price" in their own favor. Each seller reasons as follows: "If I try to charge a price above the market price, my customers will know that they can get a better price from my competitors. Thus, the seller treats the price as being given and determined by "the forces of the market" independently of her own output.

This has given us a start on understanding of the demand on the P-competition market. From the Figure we can see, that the demand curve for a P-Competitive firm is a horizontal line corresponding to the going price. And that makes sense, because the price in a P-Competitive market is determined by supply and demand – not by the seller or the buyer.

The seller has no control over the price, it means that the price is given – a constant, a horizontal line – from the point of view of the seller.

The second important thing here is equality – MR=D=p. Every additional unit of production adds to total revenue the same amount of money – its price .

So, the first basic characteristics of P-Competition is many sellers. How many sellers? How small? There is no absolute answer to that question; but there must be enough sellers and they must each be small enough so that each regards the price as being determined by the market, so that none of the sellers sees any opportunity to push the price up by cutting back on his or her output.

Similarly, there must be enough buyers, and each small enough, that each one treats the price as being determined by the market, and beyond her or his own ability to influence.

2) A homogenous product

If the product (or service) of one seller differed significantly from that of another seller, then each seller would probably be able to retain at least some of the customers, even at a very high price. These would be the customers who just prefer this seller's product (or service) to that of someone else. The assumption of homogenous products serves to rule that out.

But this assumption should not be taken too literally. No two potatoes are exactly alike. We are not assuming that the goods are alike: only that the goods produced by one supplier are good substitutes for those offered by another seller.

So, ‘Homogenous products" means all suppliers sell products that are perfect substitutes. If different sellers sold different products, then customers might be reluctant to switch suppliers when one supplier raises the price. They might stick with the supplier even at the higher price, because, even at the higher price, they like the product of that firm better than the product of another firm. Thus, homogeneity of products encourages price competition.

3) Sufficient knowledge

Some versions of the "perfectly competitive" structure include "perfect knowledge" as one of its characteristics – but, of course, "perfect knowledge" never exists in reality.

Perfect information is a little less clear than the other assumptions – we can hardly assume that people know everything there is to know! In practice, what is important is that each buyer and seller knows all about her or his opportunities to make deals, that is, knows the terms on which other market participants will buy and sell. Remember what we said in the paragraph on "many small sellers": a seller would assume that her or his customers would know if the competition were selling more cheaply. If the customers didn't know that they had alternatives, then even a very small seller might get away with pushing the price up, without losing many customers. Thus, the "perfect information" assumption complements the other assumptions. The assumptions that there are many small buyers and many small sellers, and the assumption of free entry, all mean that buyers and sellers have many alternatives of potential buyers and sellers to choose among. The assumption of sufficient information says that they know what those alternatives are.

Traders need to know quite a bit to compete effectively in markets. They need to know the terms on which other people are offering goods and services, or offering to buy; the quality of the goods and services offered, and enough about costs to judge whether the trade is profitable or not.

4) Free Entry

In the long run the entry of new competition – or the exist of unprofitable firms from the industry, to go into other trades – is one of the most important aspects of competition and is thus one of the four characteristics of the P-competitive structure.

Free entry means that new companies can set up in business to compete with established companies whenever the new competitors feel that the profits are high enough to justify the investment. This is, first and foremost, a legal condition. That is, in a "perfectly competitive" market there are no government restrictions on the entry of new competition. This legal status is often called by the French phrase "laissez faire", meaning "let them make (whatever they want to make for sale)". But it could also be a practical condition. For example, if no-one could set up in business without enormous capital investments, that might prove an effective limit on the entry of new competition – especially if, for some reason, the capital cannot be raised by borrowing or issuing shares.

Date: 2016-03-03; view: 733