Stakeholders – Government

WWF and all the charity organisations is has no profit, therefore taxes has no influence on this organisation, WWF simply not paying them because they’re non-profit organisation. But is still has a link with government because the international or local government can help them with achieving their aim. “Fully integrate the conservation of the unique biodiversity of Madagascar” that is the aim that WWF can achieve by co-operating with Madagascar’s government. So governments can also offer some help not just “take taxes”. As I mentioned in an example, government could co-operate with WWF, to achieve a common target and get double benefits from it. In this case, the benefits for the government are: “Growth of tourism after admitting the unique bio-system of Madagascar”, therefore it will be more money to the government from that growth of tourism.

But, to get some help of the government of any country, WWF needs to get attention of that problem. And that’s why there’s many and many of demonstrations around the world about different problems of ecology. And the most common theme of them is” Global Warming”.

Stakeholders – Government

People and charities like WWF has already attracted international governments. But as they think, it’s not anything because governments aren’t making any progress towards it. So after you attracted an attention you have to develop it, to find the solution of it a lot quicker!

But there’s another side of what influence does different governments has on WWF. WWF mustn’t just protect the eco-world, they should do it legally. Because they were a lot of different examples when different charities that work in a pretty same way as WWF were trying to stop deforestation in Amazons but they tried to do it in an illegal way, just by stealing equipment that was used for deforestation. But unfortunately, that charity organisation was sued and was obliged to pay fine and later on was closed due the financial problems. So that’s why, charity-based organisations should always follow the rules of the government where it works in.

Stakeholders – Investors / Owner

Background

World Wide Fund of Nature doesn’t have many shareholders, they have a “President Emeritus” - Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh – a retiring owner of the organisation and sometimes he’s the main investor of it. “President” - Yolanda Kakabadse – a main person in a company but not as honourable as “Emeritus” and “Director General” - Marco Lambertini - who runs the organisation. These 3 people are running the one of the biggest charity organisations.

Investors – also keep the company running by sponsorship and investing a huge money into it. They rarely get any profit out of it, because charity organisations are not making any profit of it. Usually, the only one benefit that they will get from investing a huge amount of money into it is – their name in a newspaper, just because they donated thousands of dollars/pounds into the charity. For example: at the 14^th of the October of 2014, Mark Zuckerberg (Founder of ”Facebook” raised 15 million dollars into the charity, to fight “Ebola” , his name was everywhere, in every newspaper , so he became even more famous than he was. And that’s it, he didn’t get any profit out of it, just reputation.

Date: 2015-12-24; view: 899