Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






Economic Impacts of Gambling

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen and thank you for coming! Let me introduce myself. My name is Kostya and I’m going to tell you about some remarkable things happening in the gambling industry and its influence on economy.

First I will give a brief representation of different points of view on gaming. Then I’ll explain the economic impact of gambling versus its social costs. And finally I’ll move on to “casino” policy in Russia.

But before I start my presentation, I would like to ask you a question. Can you recall the latest experience of playing in the casino or making a bet? Did you win any money? Did you win at least anything? I consider the answer evident. Samantha Bee explains "Last year people won more than one billion dollars playing poker. And casinos made twenty-seven billion just by being around those people."

Proponents of the view that gambling is harmful use a quote of Nobel Laureate Paul Samuelson. "(Gambling) involves simply sterile transfers of money or goods between individuals, creating no new money or goods. Although it creates no output, gambling does nevertheless absorb time and resources. When pursued beyond the limits of recreation, where the main purpose after all is to kill time, gambling subtracts from the national income." On the contrary, other economists have taken exception to Samuelson's characterization of gambling. These are products that don't add to the ability of the economy to produce more. But they still have value because they provide satisfaction, or utility in the economist's jargon, to consumers.

The arguments above lead us to rather controversial question: can gambling be a powerful economic development tool? Everybody knows that Las Vegas is a testament of the powerful ability of gambling to foster economic development. Because of gambling, Las Vegas has shown impressive job growth, developed into a major city with a low tax burden that many state and local governments look at with envy, and has spawned significant private and public sector investment.

Therefore let’s consider the positive economic effects. The economic impacts of legalized gambling are tangible and quantifiable. The basic economic impacts include the construction of a casino which leads to many jobs for construction employees and suppliers, employees to staff the casino, and the suppliers for an ongoing casino. Multiplier effects then ripple throughout the overall economy. Building and running a gambling facility doesn't create wealth, it merely transfers it. The benefit for a region is if the transfers are from outside of the region.

Important Conclusions from this Economic Development Discussion Are:

  • Firstly, Small Regions Benefit More than Large Ones. The smaller the region the more likely a gambling project will be a benefit to the region. This statement is true for the simple reason that the smaller the region, the more likely the gamblers will come from outside of the region. That suggests that an urban casino will have a much different impact than a rural casino. Also the smaller the region, the greater chance that the costs of gambling, especially those of pathological or problem gamblers will occur outside of the region.
  • The next point is: Desire to Attract Out-of-State Residents Leads to Competition Between Jurisdictions. Since the economic benefits occur in attracting out-of-state residents or preventing in-state residents from gambling in another state, legalization has led to competition between states. Once one state sees its residents crossing the river to gamble it creates pressure to make gambling within their own state legal. This pressure on regulating is referred to as a domino theory. A good example of this has been the legalization of riverboat casinos along the Mississippi river basin states.
  • As I said at the beginning, gambling brings satisfaction to the people. Thus, The Freedom of People to Gamble is Worth Something. Economists believe that the satisfaction of those who want to gamble and now can is worth something. Economists measure this and call it consumer surplus and can, in theory, estimate the dollar value of consumer surplus.

· Lastly, gaming affects Public Finance



Casino industry revenues make up close to half of the state's tax revenue. Politicians and the public are naturally attracted to an industry that is willing to pay 20 to 30 percent of its gross revenues as taxes. Also, gambling is seen as a source of money that is easier to obtain because it is not a tax on individuals. Gambling has become a very accepted way for governments to raise funds.

The graph indicates the largest estimated state revenues from gambling in 2013 in millions of dollars.

State Government Revenue From gambling
$ Millions
Nevada $556
New Jersey $296
Illinois $286
Louisiana $204
Mississippi $609
Missouri $130
Colorado $51
Iowa $46
South Dakota $4
Source: Harrah's

That’s all I have to say about positive economic effects. Now I’d like to move on to social cost, arising from gambling.

Problem and pathological gambling may be an invisible or silent disease but it is not a costless disease. Social costs are the costs borne by society as a whole that result from the behavior of the problem gambler. Social costs includes such items as fraud, theft, bad loans, bad checks, lost work time, unemployment and welfare benefits, insured or publicly supported medical costs, and criminal justice system costs. Those types of social costs are easier to quantify than other types of social costs that result from gambling such as increased rates of suicide, car accidents, and incidence of child abuse.45 Another study says that social costs should include lost productivity of spouses, impaired judgment and efficiency on the job, divorces, added administrative costs for unemployed, and the costs of depression and physical illness related to the stress and lower quality of family life.

As you remember, we are concerned about the positive and negative effects of gambling. Now I would like to turn your attention to our country and show how the government regulates gambling. To tell the truth, if you’re running an illegal casino in Russia, you better start packing your bags and head out of town. Otherwise, you can be part of a growing list of illegal joints that the Russian police is cracking down on.

Six years ago, the government decided to close all casinos and gambling bars in Russian cities and relocate them all to special gambling zones. Nowadays, it is possible to try your luck on legal grounds in Kaliningrad and Rostov regions, as well as in the Far East, Krasnodar and Altai territories. Where does the profit from gambling bars go - in the budget or in private hands? Who benefits from the law?

The turnover of the gambling market prior to the adoption of Federal Law 244 was evaluated at one billion dollars per year; tax revenue amounted to $100 million. In this case, according to the Russian law, the tax on gambling business was a local tax. To put it in a nutshell, all payments would be wired to the regional budget, where casinos and gambling bars are located. In the beginning of 2006, in Moscow alone there were 56 casinos and 5,000 gambling bars. There were also 65,000 slot machines in the Russian capital.

It may seem surprising, but no other country in the EU had the number of licenses that Russia had at the time of the adoption of the law. The turnover of the gambling business reached six billion dollars by the time when all casinos and gambling halls were closed. The illegal turnover was three times as much.

The first "legal" casino opened in January 2010. There were almost 500 million rubles spent for the arrangement of special gambling zones, following the example of Monte Carlo and Las Vegas. However, only 97.8 million returned to the treasury in taxes. Investors were in no hurry, and they still do not rush to invest their funds in regional gambling zones.

Eventually, Casinos have been banned throughout the rest of Russia. More than thirty regions - Arkhangelsk, Belgorod, Kurgan, Omsk, Chelyabinsk, Krasnoyarsk, Tatarstan, several regions of the Northern Caucasus - banned gambling institutions on their territories even before the federal law came into force . However, nothing has changed. The turnover of the gambling market in 2008, for example, after the adoption of the law, made six billion dollars (annually). Special gambling areas started to work only in 2010, such as "Yantarnaya" ("Amber"), "Azov-City", "Primorye" and "Siberian Coin."

Is the turnover of income from casinos still illegal? Not at all. The special legal zones have been divided, and it is very unlikely that the state treasury will receive taxes. Who gets the money that people leave in gambling bars?

It was originally believed that the gambling zones would receive the support from private investors. A group of businessmen showed great interest in the "Amber" gambling zone, but the government did not like them much for some reason.

Obviously, with this level of illegal gambling institutions, neither investors, nor the government will be able to obtain any profit in the legal gambling zones. No wonder that investors turn to neighboring countries where it is possible to profit from casinos.

Thus, if there is someone who profits from casinos, it is surely not the federal budget of Russia. After all, the activities of illegal casinos bring much more money than the legal gambling zones that no one needs for several years already. Originally they were created not only as a way to control the gambling activities, but also as a lure for investments in the regions that do not hold the title of "donors" of the federal budget.

But now the government spends billions to struggle against illegal gambling institutions. The government also gets a lot of money for their "protection" by the agencies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. It is worthy of note that the closure of casinos in major cities has led to a lower level of street and household crimes. And that brings us to the end of the final section.

 

Summarizing preceding arguments, it is doubtless that economic impact of gambling can be positive. Nevertheless, the social costs exceed the financial welfare in many cases. The answer to the question: can gambling be legalized- is uncertain. Every issue has its own pros and cons. Therefore in each situation the approach should be unique. By that the proper outcome from gambling will be obtained. Yet the negative aspects will arise anyway. This is a double-edged sword, so to speak.

If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask them and I’ll do my best to answer.

 

 

 

“It's hard to walk away from a winning streak, even harder to leave the table when you're on a losing one.”
― Cara Bertoia, Cruise Quarters - a Novel About Casinos and Cruise Ships

"Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math."

Unknown

 


Date: 2015-12-17; view: 704


<== previous page | next page ==>
PROGRAMME COMMITTEE MEMBERS | Le lexique par exemple
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2024 year. Copyright infringement or personal data (0.007 sec.)