Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






The Elements

The principal source for reconstructing pre-Euclidean mathematics is Euclid's Elements, for the major part of its contents can be traced back to research from the 4th century BC and in some cases even earlier. The first four books present constructions and proofs of plane geometric figures: Book I deals with the congruence of triangles, the properties of parallel lines, and the area relations of triangles and parallelograms; Book II establishes equalities relating to squares, rectangles, and triangles; Book III covers basic properties of circles; and Book IV sets out constructions of polygons in circles. Much of the content of Books I–III was already familiar to Hippocrates, and the material of Book IV can be associated with the Pythagoreans, so that this portion of the Elements has roots in 5th-century research. It is known, however, that questions about parallels were debated in Aristotle's school (around 350 BC), and so it may be assumed that efforts to prove results—such as the theorem stating that, for any given line and given point, there always exists a unique line through that point and parallel to the line—were tried and failed. Thus, the decision to found the theory of parallels on a postulate, as in Book I of the Elements, must have been a relatively recent development in Euclid's time. (The postulate would later become the subject of much study, and in modern times it led to the discovery of the so-called non-Euclidean geometries.)

Book V sets out a general theory of proportion, that is, a theory that does not require any restriction to commensurable magnitudes. This general theory derives from Eudoxus. On the basis of the theory, Book VI describes the properties of similar plane rectilinear figures and so generalizes the congruence theory of Book I. It appears that the technique of similar figures was already known in the 5th century BC, even though a fully valid justification could not have been given before Eudoxus worked out his theory of proportion.

Books VII–IX deal with what the Greeks called “arithmetic,” the theory of whole numbers. It includes the properties of numerical proportions, greatest common divisors, least common multiples, and relative primes (Book VII); propositions on numerical progressions and square and cube numbers (Book VIII); and special results, like unique factorization into primes, the existence of an unlimited number of primes, and the formation of “perfect” numbers, that is, those numbers that equal the sum of their proper divisors (Book IX). In some form, Book VII stems from Theaetetus and Book VIII from Archytas.

Book X presents a theory of irrational lines and derives from the work of Theaetetus and Eudoxus. The remaining books treat the geometry of solids. Book XI sets out results on solid figures analogous to those for planes in Books I and VI; Book XII proves theorems on the ratios of circles, the ratios of spheres, and the volumes of pyramids and cones; Book XIII shows how to inscribe the five regular solids in a given sphere (compare the constructions of plane figures in Book IV). The measurement of curved figures in Book XII is inferred from that of rectilinear figures; for a particular curved figure a sequence of rectilinear figures is considered in which succeeding figures in the sequence become continually closer to the curved figure; the particular method used by Euclid derives from Eudoxus. The solid constructions in Book XIII derive from Theaetetus.



In sum the Elements gathered together the whole field of elementary geometry and arithmetic that had developed in the two centuries before Euclid. Doubtless, Euclid must be credited with particular aspects of this work, certainly with its editing as a comprehensive whole. But it is not possible to identify for certain even a single one of its results as having been his discovery. Other more advanced fields, though not touched on in the Elements, were already being vigorously studied in Euclid's time, in some cases by Euclid himself. For these fields his textbook, true to its name, provides the appropriate “elementary” introduction.

One such field is the study of geometric constructions. Euclid, like geometers in the generation before him, divided mathematical propositions into two kinds: “theorems” and “problems.” A theorem makes the claim that all terms of a certain description have a specified property; a problem seeks the construction of a term that is to have a specified property. In the Elements all the problems are constructible on the basis of three stated postulates: that a line can be constructed by joining two given points, that a given line segment can be extended in a line indefinitely, and that a circle can be constructed with a given point as centre and a given line segment as radius. These postulates in effect restricted the constructions to the use of the so-called Euclidean tools—i.e., a compass and a straightedge or unmarked ruler.

I. Answer the questions:

1. What is the role of Euclid's Elements in Greek mathematics?

2. What do the first four books present?

3. What do Books I -III deal with?

4. What does Book V set out? What kind of a theory is it?

5. What does Book VI describe?

6. What does the theory of whole numbers include?

7. What theory does Book X present?

8. What do remaining books treat?

9. What did the Elements gather?

10. How are mathematical propositions divided? What's the difference between them?

11. How are problems constuctible in Elements?

 

 

Decide in which meaning it is used in the following sentence. By the way, how will you translate the word "description" in this sentence? Translate it into Russian.

A theorem makes the claim that all terms of a certain description have a specified property; a problem seeks the construction of a term that is to have a specified property.

III. You know the verb "to construct", don't you? Analyse the morphological structure of the word "constuctible" and translate it together with the sentence it is used in into Russian. Present the whole word family with this root.

In the Elements all the problems are constructible on the basis of three stated postulates…

 

IV. Pick up from the passage and learn all the words and expressions that could be used when writing a summary of a book.

 

V. Suggest the Russian counterparts for the following words and expressions:

constructions and proofs of plane geometric figures; congruence of triangles; the properties of parallel lines; equalities relating to squares, rectangles, and triangles; properties of circles; constructions of polygons in circles; to prove results; the subject of study; non-Euclidean geometries; a general theory of proportion; commensurable magnitudes; to derive from; similar plane rectilinear figures; to work out a theory; the theory of whole numbers; the properties of numerical proportions; a greatest common divisor; a least common multiple; relative primes; numerical progressions; unique factorization; a proper divisor; perfect number; to stem from; the geometry of solids; the ratios of circles; the ratios of spheres; volumes of pyramids and cones; a curved figure; in sum; to be credited with; a comprehensive whole; to provide an introduction; a mathematical proposition; on the basis of; a line segment; a compass, a straightedge.


Date: 2015-01-29; view: 277


<== previous page | next page ==>
Greek mathematics | Number theory
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2017 year. Copyright infringement or personal data (0.007 sec.)