Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






DUTIES OF THE STATE

The duties of the State include giving citizens their civil liberties, which include all the civil and political rights recognised by English law. There are many of these, and they include the right to life, the right to personal liberty, and the right to freedom of expression and of conscience (for example, free­dom of religion). Freedoms of expression and of assembly mean, for example, that people are free to demonstrate, provided that they do not break any laws when doing so. Then people have the right to be involved in govern­ment, to vote, and to stand for election to Parliament or local councils. They have the freedom to own property. They also have the right to the protection of the law, which includes the right of anyone accused of crime to a fair and speedy trial.

Until recently, the human rights enjoyed by every citizen in this country were not easy to find. They were contained in numerous Acts of Parliament, and in cases which form part of the common law. Three of the most import­ant landmarks in our human rights history span the centuries. After a wait of over three hundred years we now have another—the Human Rights Act 1998.

Magna Carta (The Great Charter) 121S was signed by King John in June of that year on a small island near Windsor called Runnymede. Most of the 63 clauses in this famous document handed over power from the king to his barons; but by clauses 39 and 40, as we will see in Chapter 15, King John promised that no freeman should be imprisoned without a fair trial accord­ing to law, and that no one should be denied justice. The Magna Carta has been called the foundation of our constitution.

The Petition of Right 1628 was passed by both Houses of Parliament and reluctantly signed by King Charles I. It brought a new promise that no one should be imprisoned without trial. The King also confirmed that the Crown would not tax the people without the authority of Parliament. Part of the reason

 

48 • THE INVISIBLE PALACE —PART 2 THE CONSTITUTION

for the Civil War and Charles's trial was that he was said to have broken this contract with the Parliament and the people.

The Bill of Rights 1689, signed by King William III (William of Orange) was a reaction against the disastrous reign of his father-in-law, King James II. James had by a series of arbitrary acts shown his determination to overthrow the constitution and the Church of England. One of these acts was the prosecution of the 'Seven Bishops' (see Chapter 15). The Bill of Rights, passed within weeks of William's accession to the throne, provided for free elections and freedom of speech in Parliament, and ended the royal power to suspend laws which Parliament had passed. It also prohibited 'excessive bail and fines' (see Chapter 12 for bail) as well as * cruel and unusual punishments'.

The Human Rights Act 1998, which came into force in October 2000, gives to the citizens of this country the rights given to individuals by the European Convention on Human Rights. When he introduced the new law Lord Irvine of Lairg, the Lord Chancellor, said: 'The Government this week has taken a major step in its programme of constitutional reform. It has introduced into Parliament a Human Rights Bill to incorporate the European Convention on Human Rights into British law.' Professor Sir William Wade QC, an eminent constitutional lawyer, has described the Human Rights Act as 'one of our greatest constitutional milestones'.



The European Convention guarantees a number of basic human rights, which are now part of our law. They cover many fundamental matters: the right to life; rights against torture or degrading treatment or punishment, slavery, and forced labour; rights to liberty and security of the person; the right to a fair trial and protection against retrospective criminal laws; respect for private and family life, home, and correspondence; freedom of thought, conscience, and religion; freedom of expression; freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association, including the right to join a trade union; the right to marry and to found a family; and rights against discrimination in the enjoyment of all these rights and freedoms. Citizens now have a code of rights which they can enforce in the courts—the nearest thing we have to a written constitution.

In his book The Family Story published in 1981, Lord Denning, one of the greatest of our twentieth-century judges, wrote:

In our constitutional theory Parliament is supreme. Parliament can take us into the Common Market. Parliament can take us out of it—by a simple majority. Parliament can pass a Bill of Rights. But it can also repeal it or any clause in it—by a simple majority. We have no entrenched clauses. We have no fundamental constitution by


THE INVISIBLE PALACE —PART 2 THE CONSTITUTION • 49

which other laws can be tested. No matter that a law may be unreasonable or unjust, nevertheless if it is clear on the point, the judges have no option. They must apply the statute as it stands. The people of this country, however, trust Parliament—and the members of it—always to be guided by those instincts for justice and liberty of which I have written.

When we come to look more closely at human rights, we will see that there has been a move away from this statement of principle. Judges still do not have the power to 'strike down' Acts of Parliament as unconstitutional, but senior judges now have the power and duty under the Human Rights Act to 'declare', if it be the case, that any laws passed by Parliament are 'incompatible' with the rights given by the European Convention. When this happens, Parliament will be expected to reconsider these laws, and may repeal them to bring them in line with the rights granted by the Convention. All judges have the duty to ensure that the rights to a fair trial given by the European Convention are respected. The courts therefore now play a major role in the field of human rights.

The Human Rights Act has already made a real difference to the approach of our courts to the issue of human rights. Its principles have also caused the Government to think hard about the constitution, even to the point of considering that the ancient office of Lord Chancellor, with its wide range of powers spread across the legislature, executive, and judiciary, is unconstitutional. When it comes to the development of our constitution, we are indeed living in interesting times.

 


Date: 2015-01-12; view: 960


<== previous page | next page ==>
HUMAN RIGHTS | Tools and Concepts
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2024 year. Copyright infringement or personal data (0.008 sec.)