Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






SPRE Critical Thinking Framework

(Situation-Problem-Response-Evaluation)

 

There is a growing realization that language instruction is perhaps most effective when it calls upon learners to perform meaningful tasks or solve real-world problems in the target language. So-called task- and problem- based approaches to language acquisition signal movement away from English as “an end in itself” and toward it as “a means of achieving ends greater than itself”. At the heart of these approaches are critical thinking frameworks such as SPRE (Situation-Problem-Response-Evaluation) that serve to not only structure but propel cognition. In other words, what these dynamic approaches promote is the “synergistic co-evolution” so to speak of linguistic and cognitive competencies, or the development of critical, independent, and creative thinking skills en route to native-like proficiency thought vital to 21st century academic, professional, and interpersonal success.

 

 


SPRE Implementation

In practice, the whole project is carried out in teams of three students. The teams agree about the roles inside the group- there must be a problem person, a response person and an evaluation person. These roles are valid for one Unit only, and later on there will be a rotation, where a problem person will become a response person, etc.

PRE Rotation

  Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3
Student 1 problem response evaluation
Student 2 evaluation problem response
Student 3 response evaluation problem

 

S=Situation done in a whole team Who? What? When? Where? Objectively describe a dilemma
P=Problem What’s wrong/ the matter? Identify & prioritize problems: 1st, 2nd, etc.  
R=Response Reaction to problem(s) How do we go about solving the problems? What specific actions should be taken?  
E=Evaluation Overall critical assessment Will the response be effective? What are its pros/cons/costs/benefits? What should be applied/eliminated/modified?

 

Example.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfVxrtF8C88 –

Panel discussion about bullying in schools ( Week1. Introduction).

Situation.

Bullying affects all of kids and can’t be ignored. Adults either want to keep everything under control or they don’t want to do anything claiming that it is ‘a way of life’.

However, introduction of social norms and providing support and protection can reduce bullying by 50%.

 

Problem.

Is bullying a serious problem for schoolchildren? Should some measures be taken or as children grow up, it disappears? Isn’t it just a way of life? Are there any really effective ways to prevent bullying?

 

Response.

1. A victim should learn how to stand for him/herself.

2. Extracurricular activities like clubs, drama help kids to feel more confident and make friends. The more friends you have, the fewer people will try to make fun of you.



3. Schools should teach more rules about ethical behavior, discipline and respect.

4. School teachers should take a course on conflict resolution as part of their accreditation.

5. Kids should be kept busy all the time. Then they won’t have time to plot against others.

 

Evaluation.

1. If you respect yourself, you won’t be bullied. Can you teach yourself to stand up for yourself? You need to have some type of guidance.

2. Yes, if a school has a range organizations, it really helps kids.

3. Children tend to listen more to their parents than to strangers at school. If they have hard family life, it greatly affects them.

4. Teachers could take a special course, but they are biased anyway and they never go against the most popular crowd.

 

 

8th semester timetable

Week 1 Feb 9-15 Introduction
Week 2 - 4 Feb16-March 8 Unit 1
Week 5-7 March 9-29 Unit 2
Week 8-10 March 30-Apr 19 Unit 3
Week 11-12 Apr 20-May 3 Reflection

 

Unit Schedule

Week 1 A teacher introduces a topic with videos/texts and exercises   Podcasts/Video segments Texts Comprehension, lexical, discourse exercises  
Week 2 Setting up a problem. Breaking into teams. Discussions and brainstorming.   Prepare for “expert panel discussions”: -Explain task & establish teams -Assign team member roles (SPRE framework)-Teams begin planning for PDs -Target grammar (genre-specific) Figures (comprehension, formatting, expression)-Scientific documentation (citation, references, etc.)  
Week 3 Panel discussion Each PRE panel presents in turn ( 3- min speech from each student + 1-2 visuals) All students participate as speakers and as audience.  
Writing assignment Science report : separate assignments for each role. Approach: critical thinking. Format: 2-3 pages (double-spaced) of prose.  

The focus of the first week of each module is on introducing its problem through both

• academic videos/podcasts (www.ted.com; www.youtube.com; www.bbc.com/news/technology) and academic lectures (www.ocw.mit.edu; www.doitpoms.ac.uk).

• and scientific journal articles . The video/podcast will be reinforced with tailor-made listening comprehension (gist/details) and vocabulary exercises/activities. Time will also be devoted to article “busting” , with foci on reading comprehension (gist/details) and close reading, or discourse analyses of standard sections.

* Basic videos and articles with exercises are available in www.dropbox.com rossog@rambler.ru; password ESP2015) sorted by units. You can also find extra materials there and feel free to use them and supplement with exercises of your own. Please send the materials to rossog@rambler.ru and gaerlachsenior@gmail.com.

A major focus of the second week of each module will be on preparing oral arguments, in the form of “expert” panel discussions, in response to the MP. The panel discussions, scheduled to occur in class the following week, will serve not only as the primary speaking assessment but as a pre-writing activity for all written assignments. Another goal of the second week is working with target grammar extracted from the module articles and the “What?” and “How?” of scientific figure (graphs, tables, charts, etc.), formatting and research documentation.

The third week of each module aims to synthesize and actualize the listening and reading comprehension, vocabulary, grammar, discourse analyses, and panel discussion preparation of the previous two weeks by inviting students to (1) provide your “expert” opinion on the Unit problem via a panel discussion (speaking assessment) , and then begin to (2) set your verbalized – and therefore well-processed – thoughts to paper in an organized and coherent fashion (SPRE-based written assessment).

8th semester assessment

IELTS (Mark) + Critical thinking project (Pass/Fail) assessment scheme

IELTS RESULTS Final mark ( diploma)
• 5,5-7,5 • Project Pass   excellent
• 5,0 • Project Pass   good
• 4,5 • Project Pass   satisfactory
• 0-4,0* • Project Pass   unsatisfactory * satisfactory if IELTS retake result in May is 4,5+
Failure to complete Project work in the semester downgrades IELTS score to “0”.   unsatisfactory

 

 

Critical Thinking Project Assessment ( Pass : 7 done “ⱱs” out of 9)

  Individual Completion of Activities Participation in Panel Discussion   Personalized Report Writing
UNIT 1 “ⱱ” =done “ⱱ” =done “ⱱ” =done
UNIT 2 “ⱱ” =done “ⱱ” =done “ⱱ” =done
UNIT 3 “ⱱ” =done “ⱱ” =done “ⱱ” =done

 

 

Course Materials.


Date: 2016-03-03; view: 1204


<== previous page | next page ==>
Unit Problems ( UPs) | Week 1. Introduction.
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2024 year. Copyright infringement or personal data (0.007 sec.)