Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






Levels of inference.

Berry, Poortinga, Segall and Dasen (1992) suggested the presence of three levels of inferences in cross-cultural psychology. An example of low level inferences occur when the researcher constructs direct samples of content from the domain of interest and from such sample tests make inferences about the domain studied. The use of scales measuring attitudes toward various groups like immigrants or intergroup relations involving contacts between national or ethnic groups are examples of low level inferences (Van der Veer, Ommundsen, Larsen, Van Le, Krumov, Pernice, Pastor Romans, 2004). Through scaling procedures the researcher selects a representative sample of attitude statements that reflect the domain of the attitude in question. If the selection of scale items is representative comparisons to the domain of the attitude are considered valid. Here as elsewhere one must take precautions that the statements selected do not contain information that is culturally unique and relevant only to some respondents and not others. Likewise the methods used must also be clearly understood and equivalent cross-culturally.

Medium level inferences according to Berry et al refer to generalization from domains that are not directly observable including cognitive abilities or personality traits that are nevertheless manifested in predictable behaviors. Here the objective is not to obtain representative samples of the domain of study, but rather to capture the essence of the psychological trait. At this medium level of inference it is difficult to assume without ambiguity whether the domains studied are in fact comparable across cultures. Is the authoritarianism observed in Saudi Arabia equivalent to that observed in the United States? There are probably many differences confounded by other variables like religiosity that makes direct comparisons difficult. Some personality traits may be culturally specific and that makes comparative inferences difficult.

High level inferences refer to domains not easily specified, and that can’t be measured by standard measurement procedures. At this level of inference it is doubtful if measurements can capture the domain of interest. Observed differences are explained post hoc after the exploratory research is completed and without solid empirical evidence. Examples cited by Berry et al include the use of high level concepts like intelligence or adaptation. Since adaptability is required in all cultural environments how it is possible to state with any confidence that one culture is better adapted than another? These types of assertions go beyond what the data will support and tend to be unclear and not easily operationalized with valid comparative methodology.


Date: 2015-01-11; view: 892


<== previous page | next page ==>
Nonequivalence in cross-cultural research. | Studies of cultural level ecological averages.
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2024 year. Copyright infringement or personal data (0.008 sec.)