Progress, Problems, and Reform

The Industrial Revolution had already transformed England into a modern industrial state by the time Victoria took the throne. By 1850, England boasted 18,000 cotton mills and produced half the iron in the world.

Middle-class ProsperityThe Industrial Revolution created vast new wealth for England’s rapidly growing middle class. This material progress was celebrated in the Great Exhibition of 1851, the purpose of which was to display “the Works of Industry of All Nations.” Housed in an enormous, glittering glass-and-steel building called the Crystal Palace, the Exhibition showcased every marvel of the age: indoor toilets, telegraphs, power looms, electric lights, even a full-size locomotive—17,000 exhibits in all.

For the middle class who ran the factories, all these inventions represented both a means of making money and a dazzling array of goods to spend it on. Middle-class Victorians enjoyed indulging themselves in displays of wealth, from top hats and ruffled dresses to large houses crammed with heavy, ornate furniture and fancy knickknacks. With the help of servants, hostesses vied to serve the most lavish feasts and—insecure in their new respectability—tried to outdo each other in displaying refined manners and behavior.

Some writers, such as Thomas Babington Macaulay,expressed enthusiasm for the material advantages afforded by the industrial age. Others, such as Thomas Carlyleand William Morris,were appalled by Victorian materialism, which they saw as tasteless, joyless, and destructive of community. Likewise, the virtuous airs adopted by the middle class, who often had trouble living up to their own uncompromising moral standards, led to angry charges of hypocrisy.

The Downside of ProgressWhile the middle class was becoming more prosperous, conditions for the poor grew more intolerable. Factory workers spent 16-hour days toiling for low wages under harsh and dangerous conditions. Children, especially, suffered. Five-year-olds worked in the cotton mills as scavengers, crawling under the moving machinery to pick up bits of cotton from the floor, or in the coal mines, dragging heavy tubs of coal through narrow tunnels. Paid just a few cents a day, child workers endured empty bellies, frequent beatings, and air so filled with dust that they could hardly breathe.

To make matters worse, in the 1840s unemployment in England soared, leaving many families without a breadwinner. In addition, the potato blight and famine that devastated Ireland in 1845 forced 2 million starving people to emigrate. Many crowded into England’s already squalid slums.

Reform and UncertaintyThough Parliament enacted many important reforms during this period, change came slowly as the middle and upper classes came to realize that the poor were not to blame for their own plight. In 1833, Parliament abolished slavery in the British Empire and passed the first laws restricting child labor. It also ushered in free trade, repealing laws that kept out cheaper foreign grain. Slowly, more reforms followed. Gladstone and the new Liberal Party established public schools and mandated secret ballots for elections. Gladstone’s rival, the Tory politician Disraeli, won passage of bills that improved housing and sanitation, legalized trade unions, eased harsh factory conditions, and, in 1867, gave the vote to working-class men.

Even for those who benefited most, though, progress could be painful. Despite their admiration for technology and their faith in human ingenuity, most Victorians were deeply religious, and some of the theories proposed by modern scientists threatened cherished beliefs.

In 1830 the geologist Charles Lyell published evidence that the earth was formed not in 4004 BC, as held by popular interpretations of the Bible, but millions of years earlier. Then, in 1859, Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species introduced his theory that plant and animal species evolved through natural selection—an idea that prompted furious debate because it seemed to contradict the biblical account of creation. “There is not a creed which is not shaken,” wrote poet and critic Matthew Arnold, “not an accredited dogma which is not shown to be questionable, not a received tradition which does not threaten to dissolve.”

Date: 2016-03-03; view: 951