State loans - Every kind of loan proves infirmity in the State

29.

Every kind of loan proves infirmity in the State and a want of understanding of the rights of the State.

Loans hang like a sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers, who, instead of taking from their subjects by a temporary tax, come begging with outstretched palm of our bankers.

Foreign loans are leeches which there is no possibility of removing from the body of the State until they fall off of themselves or the State flings them off.

But the goy States do not tear them off; they go on in persisting in putting more on to themselves so that they must inevitably perish, drained by voluntary blood-letting.

Tyranny of Usury

30.

What also indeed is, in substance, a loan, especially a foreign loan?

A loan is - an issue of government bills of exchange containing a percentage obligation commensurate to the sum of the loan capital.

If the loan bears a charge of 5 per cent, then in twenty years the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty - treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt.

31.

From this calculation it is obvious that with any form of taxation per head the State is baling out the last coppers of the poor taxpayers in order to settle accounts with wealth foreigners, from whom it has borrowed money instead of collecting these coppers for its own needs without the additional interest.

32.

So long as loans were internal the goyim only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary person in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, all the wealth of States flowed into our cash boxes and all the goyim began to pay us the tribute of subjects.

Every kind of loan proves infirmity in the State
(Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion)

Tell me, what is there not clear in that text? What is NEW in what Jeffrey Sachs says, that is not described in detail, and even hundreds of years ago? Is there an argument with the content and the "program" of the Protocols in anyone's mind?

So Jeffrey Sachs is not a "messiah" of ANY kind, interested in the liberation of peoples from slavery. It, as saying goes, "is not funny even to the chickens".

The question arises: why would Jeffrey Sachs, a humble servant the forces of evil, be exhibited here as a knight on a white horse? What is the meaning of his deep economic "revelations" and to whom is it really necessary to point out that the white day is really white?

Some leading experts in economics said that Jeffrey Sachs' economic "theories" are nothing more than delusions, that never worked, do not work and can not possibly work. About the only thing they may produce is destruction of economy and enslavement of the countries where they have been implemented, which is what happened in Russia, Eastern Europe and Bolivia among other places where he "advised".

All of these countries, in essence, had completely lost their sovereignty and do no longer exist as real independent states. They live according the the program imposed on them from the outside, and all of their resources belong to the "Banking mafia", "from over the hill".

It should be noted that the Chinese during the "most peaceful gevolution in Russia" - the collapse of the Soviet Union, said this:

Date: 2016-01-14; view: 767