Groups Issue Warning: Pro-Corporate TPP Could Kill the Internet

Digital rights groups warn that TPP "will criminalize our online activities, censor the Web, and cost everyday users money." (Photo: Getty)

The "disastrous" pro-corporate trade deal finalized Monday could kill the Internet as we know it, campaigners are warning, as they vow to keep up the fight against the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement between the U.S. and 11 Pacific Rim nations.

"Internet users around the world should be very concerned about this ultra-secret pact", said OpenMedia's digital rights specialist Meghan Sali. "What we’re talking about here is global Internet censorship. It will criminalize our online activities, censor the Web, and cost everyday users money. This deal would never pass with the whole world watching—that’s why they’ve negotiated it in total secrecy."

"The TPP will criminalize our online activities, censor the Web, and cost everyday users money. This deal would never pass with the whole world watching—that’s why they’ve negotiated it in total secrecy." —Meghan Sali, Open Media

TPP opponents have claimed that under the agreement, "Internet Service Providers could be required to 'police' user activity (i.e. police YOU), take down Internet content, and cut people off from Internet access for common user-generated content."

Among the deal's provisions are rules that could criminalize file-sharing, whistleblowing, and breaking digital locks, even for legitimate purposes. Of course, because the contents of the pact have been negotiated largely in secret, the exact implications of the TPP on user rights is yet to be seen.

Groups Issue Warning: Pro-Corporate TPP Could Kill the Internet
(Blacklisted News)

The rest of Benya's report may be summarized simply as "tale told by an idiot, full of fury, signifying nothing".

Just piles upon piles of words upon words upon words, none of which are more significant or more trustworthy then what you can find in all sorts of other places, and, surely enough, the culmination is showing the significance of Benya himself, especially in light of that story with his neighbor, who, as Benya is nearly certain, is the Mossad agent, obviously placed next to Benya for no uncertain reasons.

He keeps constantly reminding his readers about unending efforts to kill him. But he does not tell them that to kill him would be to kill "the goose that lays the golden eggs" for his puppet masters. Why would they do so? What danger this disinformation agent represents with all his bluff and utterly unverifiable lies, "prophecies" and concoctions of all kinds? Just about all they have to do is to say: "PROVE IT, sucker", and it would be clear to anyone with his mind still functioning that to prove any of his concoctions is simply impossible.

Secondly, to kill him is the simplest thing in the world and he would be killed a long, long time ago if he would really represent any kind of problem and that could be done by the professionals and no one would ever be able to catch or even identify them. Again, the same argument applies here: "prove it, suckers!".

But for his ego of a megalomaniac, this definitely boosts his image to the level of someone of profound significance, which he constantly shows off in all sorts of selfies with those of "authority" and "power" in the scheme of things. It is like "look how great I am if I can even rub my shoulders against no one less than David Rockefeller in a selfie! Am I not great, and, by implication, does not it mean that all I am telling you is true? Otherwise, why would David Rockefeller dirty his image by showing off with some liar and fabricator"? Try to argue this bulletproof "logic" of this "liar, fraud, con man, charlatan, Narcissist, fantasist and criminal plagiarist", as he was called by the alleged "illuminati".

The New World Order - Benjamin Fulford

Date: 2016-01-14; view: 768