Some issues with the Osho's commune in Oregon

We are simply obliged to mention some problems and the issues with his "commune" in Oregon, that are of the same kinds as problems we are discussing here, the issues of governing, in order to avoid creating a one-sided or distorted or incomplete picture of the whole thing.

Basically, it was run by absolute dictators, and the person "#1", the only person he communicated with and was regularly discussing the issues of the commune and giving the instructions to follow. And, interestingly enough, she was formerly a waitress in a restaurant in the New York. So, in terms of "merits", it tells you something. And on the top of it, she was Jewess. What a "killer" combination!

Now, he himself was considered to be an "absolute authority", just like some "god". Anything he said was beyond any arguments and had to be followed, like it was a word of "god", quite literally.

He did not relate to anyone besides that formal "head" of the commune. He did have several people working for him, providing food, cleaning his house and performing other service type of activities. But those things were done mostly in silence. Everyone knew what they are supposed to do and they just did it. There was simply no need for a chatter of any kind, and, if they would like to get his opinions or discuss something, they could submit a question and he would talk about it on his daily lecture, but only if he considered that question significant enough and applicable to others.

Now, under that "head" of the commune sat a bunch of what we choose to call "power witches", or "power bitches", as they were called by some. Those were the heads of various departments, dealing with day-to-day practical activities of the "commune". They also had an absolute and unquestionable "power" in their departments and nearly anything they said was actually a dictatorial order, to be followed unquestionably and unarguably.

That was a part of the trip of disabling the egos, known as "breaking the resistance". Yes, it does make some sense. But this is not something just to be "swallowed" as is, as it has some quite far reaching repercussions. Basically, it is a thin hair away from total dictatorship and oppression. Something not to be taken lightly, even though he does provide plenty of "reasoning" for it.

There were several reasons it was organized that way and he talked about it in his lectures on numerous occasions. It is quite a long subject to discuss here, so we'll just touch upon a couple of points.

First of all, they were all women. The idea was that women are less entangled in their heads and were acting more on the level of a feeling, than men, who tend to be guided more by purely mental aspects, then the level of feeling. Basically, he called his approach "the way of the heart" during numerous lectures. In that respect, it was quite "natural" to give the controlling aspects of running the "commune" to women.

Secondly, he mentioned it numerous times that the women were forever abused and exploited by the men worldwide, and so, it was his way to somehow compensate them for all the injustice and abuse, which women were subjected to throughout the history.

So, the entire environment was basically dictatorial, and this is pretty much the same issue as mankind is facing in respect to social organization throughout the world. It is either a monarchy, which is dictatorial in its nature, simply because some "tsar" or a "king" has the absolute power and authority, or, alternatively, it is an approach of "representative democracy", which is nothing but a myth, as in reality, the "ordinary" people do not "rule" anything, nor do they actually elect anyone to represent their interests. Even the "democratic" societies are ruled by all sorts of corrupt individuals having "power" or money, and those, in turn, are ruled by various "nobilities" or "ruling bloodlines". And it all happens behind the curtains.

We emphasize: in reality, people never "rule" anything and never actually "elect" anyone. They might think they "elect" someone, but either side they elect is inevitably going to serve not them, but their own puppeteers. They just THINK they do. But the reality of it is that it is all decided by some "hidden hand", working behind the curtains, and that "hidden hand", on the topmost level, is the same evil bankers and the same ZioNazi satanists, as you can see worldwide, everywhere you look, pretty much. And it is them, who "elects", or, rather, appoints the "presidents", "prime ministers" and so on, and they do it upon the direct instructions of the servants of either Lucifer and his "negative approach" or the "dark side".

And the dictatorial, or "ruling families", approach has deficiencies. Probably the main one is that it stifles the "free will" and "free choices" of "the rest of us". This, in turn, means that various developments and "progress" is limited to what some "king" thinks to be either "necessary" or "appropriate", or "beneficial", primarily to himself and his own "interests", as those stand above all other considerations.

But the problem is that it is only HIS own limited opinion and his own "priorities", which does not mean that they are in fact beneficial to the whole society. The opinion or the ideas of one man is just that - a one man's opinion. But does it benefit the society or does it hold it back and from which point of view and which aspect is a totally different issue.

Furthermore, this "dictatorial" vs "democratic" approach is a general issue of any kind of governing as such. Even if you look at some "village elders", we still have the same issue of how much weight and "authority" do their decisions or "rulings" have. On one hand, if they are indeed "wise", as expected from any kind of "elders", then it seems that THEIR word has more weight than of "regular" people. Otherwise, why do you have them in the first place?

On the other hand, even "elders" may simply be not "up to date" on all sorts of issues, such as science, technology and so on. So, their view may be "outdated" and "stale". You might have some ideas of some "bright kid" that could potentially lead to a progress of some kind, but it does not mean that those "elders" will even be able to comprehend and/or appreciate the relative value of it, as far as benefits to "all of us".

On the other hand, the very idea of "democracy" is basically the idea of "rule by the herd", in the best case. Simply because the plain, ordinary people do not have the sufficient level of education and their minds are not likely to be either "developed" or "sophisticated" enough to handle all sorts of issues any society is facing.

Thus, the idea of "meritocracy", which does make at least some sense in principle. Except it needs to be clarified and further refined to make sure that we do not get some ego-centric maniacs in the structures of governing, who do not necessarily even have the necessary qualifications to govern in general terms.

But there is quite an interesting issue here that has to do with Life, as such, and the very idea of a "progress" or even Creativity. And that is, no matter what kinds of "merits" one might have, it does not necessary mean that one can SEE. Can see the very essence of Life and its eternal "goals".

Interestingly enough, some of the brightest geniuses in the entire history, when asked "but HOW did this brilliant idea come to your mind", often answer along the lines of: "I do not know. I simply have no idea. All I know is that it just appeared in my mind as a whole. I did not merely contruct it out of my previous knowledge. It 'came' as a complete whole".

And what would THAT possibly mean? Well, what is Creativity? For example, if we consider quite popular view, circulated on the net nowadays, about the densities of existence, then we know that the mankind exists on what is called the Third Density, and that density is where self-awareness appears in the process of "evolution" of the Intelligence on a given planet.

If we consider that view, than it implies that beyond our "physical world" and self-awareness exist the HIGHER levels of Intelligence, which, in turn, might imply that what we consider to be our own Creation, is in fact simply the information or ideas passed to us "down the spiral" of development from the higher levels of Intelligence, where what we think to be our own creation, is in fact already well known and it existed, tested and verified well before we conceived this idea. But, in reality, we might have just received the energy cluster, or a "thought form".

Yes, it is "ours", at least in a sense that it is we, who had expressed it. But is it genuinely "ours"? - Ask any "genius" or even a talented person: how and where do you get your most brilliant ideas? See what he tells you, at least if he is honest and has enough awareness to even recognize what had in fact taken place.

So, if we go back to the issues of governing, and even if we give the idea of "meritocracy" some consideration, then what we might end up with is that in order to govern in really beneficial and productive ways, it is not enough to merely have some "elders" or "wise" men, or even those with "merits". Simply because those aspects do not necessarily guarantee the genuinely beneficial development of awareness on this planet.

For example, "merits" do not necessarily give you VISION and assure that you can "SEE" the very nature of Life. They are nothing more but a set of "achievements" of one kind or another. As to "wisdom", you will hardly be able to find two people who can agree as to what it is. And a notion of some "elders" does make sense, but only if you consider their "visionary" abilities. How many pretty foolish and totally incompetent, or even idiotic people have you seen among the "elders"?

And, in terms of evolution, what evolves is the level or a degree of AWARENESS. All our inventions or creative acts merely provide more complex feedback to our awareness, as a result of more extended interplay between our awareness and seemingly "our own" fruits of creation. No wonder it was said: "by their FRUITS you shall know them". Yes, it was said in a different context and for a different purpose, but, nevertheless, it is a pointer.

But what evolves is not our tools and gadgets, even though they seem to, or anything else in the physical world, but precisely our awareness, as that is the very purpose of the "evolution process". As awareness grows, our fruits of creativity become more and more subtle, more and more "out of this world", forever remaining on the fringes of "possible", and conceivable.

And, as soon as our awareness can reach and comprehend the levels beyond of merely material, we "leap" to the next level of development of that, which is still the same thing, awareness, except it is no longer mere "self-awareness", but becomes "us-awareness", as a single WHOLE, inseparable, but by the infinite multitude of manifestations. From then on, it is no longer the level of exploitation and manipulation of the physical objects, and we begin to sense and learn the "next level", the next "density", which is Love.

Once your own consciousness is no longer "ruled" by the ideas of "me and my own interests", you begin to sense that Life, as such, is not about some "me", but about "US, AS A WHOLE". In fact, you can even see some claims that we are not separable, even from each other, as we are all but the "components" of that, which is known as The Infinite Intelligence, ALL Encompassing and Forever Expanding.

At that point, your attachment to the physical world no longer "serves", or brings any real benefits to your Self, or Soul, or that, which is known as "real you". Because the world of the material is quite limited in all sorts of respects by the needs and limitations of the physical body, which requires the external energy for its existence, which begins the whole chain of "problems" and issues of all kind.

For example, how many people have asked a simple question: what is the purpose of the teeth in my mouth? Well, it is but to KILL the other forms of Life. Is it not a "limitation" of some kind? It is known from the ancient times, that "you are not your body, and you are not your mind, you are that, which lays beyond these". It is also known as "The Forth" - Turia, and there are all sorts of other similar ideas or the ways of saying essentially the same thing: what you know and what you see is NOT the REAL you. It is but appearances and illusions of all kinds. The REAL you is that, which is Eternal. You can agree with or not, it is up to you to decide and see the very essence of it.

You still need the "external" input from the "higher" levels or densities in order to make the most beneficial "progress". Otherwise, it may turn out to be either violence, of one kind or another, or self-serving obsession with some ideas, that do not necessarily even comprehend some not so "beneficial" side effects of our ideas, that may lead the mankind to yet another form of degradation, while claiming to lead us all to some mythical "bight future".

How do you know which version of some amorphous "future" is "bright" or not? Can you SEE into the "future"?

And that is probably one of the major problems. Because on one hand, you need your own intelligence, education and other qualifications to assure that the future is going to be indeed bright, or at least "you know what you are doing". But on the other hand, your "bright future" might be ALREADY known, and for eons, as this kind of experiment has already been conducted by the Intelligence in countless number of other cases.

Yes, indeed, every "case" is unique, as that is the very nature of Life and Intelligence as such, as its "main" requirement is the exploration of NEW ways and means of "evolution" of the Intelligence as such. That is the very nature of Creativity as such. By merely repeating the known, you can not create anything unknown previously.

And "the end goal", some claim, is for the Infinite Creator to know Itself, in all possible or probable aspects and manifestations, which is an endless process, as it never stops and can not possibly stop, but to "leap" to even more grand level.

Well, we hope you are getting less confused as a result of all this, and not more. Yes, there is plenty to study and there is plenty to "chew upon". But that is the the whole Joy of Life, which can only expand. Once you find it, or, rather, RECOGNIZE it, it can only grow, as that is its very Nature.

(Written and recorded as a service and with the help of your humble assistants from the spheres beyond visible).

"BUSTED: TOTALLY PROVEN BEYOND ALL DOUBT:
THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT STAGED THE ATTACKS, ROUNDED UP THE FUTURE "VICTIMS" AFTER THEY LEFT THE BATACLAN, MURDERED THEM"

Here's a pretty mind-blowing report from Jim Stone's site, which deserves a closer look, at least. We tried to do only a minimal edit of his original in terms of text formatting and splitting some paragraphs into smaller ones to make it easier to read. But still, it might look kind of wild for our regular readers. But, at the same time, it gives them the information about the emotional tone of the report.

Sure, his writings, just like probably anything else out there, might better be taken with a grain of salt, instead of "swallowing it" as is, without closer examination.

Just "hold on to your seat" while reading it. That is about all we can say...

Who is Jim Stone?

(Click to get some info about it)

BUSTED: TOTALLY PROVEN BEYOND ALL DOUBT: THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT STAGED THE ATTACKS, ROUNDED UP THE FUTURE "VICTIMS" AFTER THEY LEFT THE BATACLAN, MURDERED THEM WHILE THEY WERE IN CUSTODY, AND THEN SET UP THE BLOODY SCENE WITH THE BODIES.

A GLITCH IN THE MEXICAN MEDIA HAS PROVEN THAT THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT MURDERED "VICTIMS" WHILE IN CUSTODY OF THE AUTHORITIES. WE DEFINITELY HAVE A LOT OF DEAD PEOPLE IN THESE "TERROR ATTACKS" AND IT LOOKS LIKE NONE DIED "IN THE NAME OF ISLAM".

BUSTED: THE ONE MEXICAN GIRL (Nohemi Gonzalez) WHO DIED WAS CONFIRMED ALIVE AFTER THE BATACLAN SHOOTING WHEN HER FAMILY CALLED HER BOYFRIEND'S PHONE AFTER HEARING ABOUT THE SHOOTING IN THE MEXICAN MEDIA. HE SAID HE WAS WITH HER OUTSIDE AND THEY WERE BOTH FINE, AND NOW, AFTER THE AUTHORITIES TOOK HER INTO CUSTODY SHE IS DEAD. BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED, THERE WERE NO TERRORISTS, THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT DID THIS JOB, AND IT IS A FILTHY FALSE FLAG.

I MIGHT GET BLASTED OFF THE WEB FOR REPORTING THIS, BUT IT IS A COLD HARD FACT, IT CAME ACROSS THE TELEVISION WHILE I WAS GOING OVER THE PHOTOS OF THE BATACLAN. THE DEAD BODY SCENE LOOKED REAL, BUT WAS TOO LOW RES TO WORK WITH. THEN THIS REPORT CAME ACROSS THE TV WITH THE GIRL'S FAMILY ON TELEVISION, SAYING IT LIKE IT HAPPENED FROM THEIR PERSPECTIVE. THEY CONFIRMED SHE WAS NOT SHOT AFTER THEY HEARD ABOUT THE SHOOTINGS IN THE PRESS. THEY GOT AHOLD OF HER BOYFRIEND AFTER THE BATACLAN WAS EMPTY, WHO WAS WITH HER ALIVE AND TOTALLY UNHURT OUTSIDE THE THEATER. NOW, AFTER BEING TAKEN INTO CUSTODY BY AUTHORITIES TOTALLY UNHURT SHE HAS BEEN CONFIRMED DEAD AND HER FAMILY IS WONDERING HOW, WHEN THEY CONFIRMED SHE WAS NOT HURT AND ALL WAS WELL.

Date: 2016-01-14; view: 744