CATEGORIES:
BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism
Recommended readingAbizadeh, A. 2005 “Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity”. In American Political Science Review Vol. 99, No. (1 February), pp. 45-60 Billig M., National Stereotypes; Marsland D. National Symbols p.217-222 / Encyclopedia of Nationalism. Transnational Publ., Ed. by. A.S.Leoussi, 2001 Ethan Bueno de Mesquita, “The Quality of Terror”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 49, No. 3. (Jul., 2005), pp. 515-530 Ilan Gur-Ze’ev and Ilan Pappé, “Beyond the Destruction of the Other’s Collective Memory.”, Theory, Culture & Society. Vol. 20, No. 1, 2003 Kahn, Joel S, “Modernity and its Others: Universal Ideals and Particular Outcomes”, in J. Kahn, Modernity and Exclusion, London: Sage, 2001 Nye, J.S. Jr. The Paradox of American Power, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 2002 Starr, A. Naming the enemy: Anti-Corporate Social Movements Confront Globalization, London Zed, 2000 Thompson, John B. The Media & Modernity, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995 Zehfuss, Maja “Forget September 11”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2003.
Class 10. Class objective: focus on how we shape national identity; Mini-lecture reveals what political symbols and myth are used for shaping political and ethnic identities. Then we elaborate on how (based on missionary zeal) racial and ethnic inequality and prejudice are built up; go on into talking about separatism and extremism in modern world. Seminar disputes victimization as a part of post-colonial political identity; the right of nations for independence and a concept of non-interference into domestic affairs in a contemporary global politics. Touch upon aspects of Diaspora life and evolution of a nation-state under globalization. HANDOUT: “100% American” Mandatory reading: *** Philosophic Iterations, Cosmopolitanism and the “Rigth to Right”, Conversation with Seyla Benhabib (UC Berkely, March 18, 2004). Malesewic, S. Identity and ideology. Palgrave, Ireland, 2006 / Chapter I. Ethnic and National Identity: the conceptual Critique, p.13-57. Recommended reading: Aihwa Ong, Graduated Sovereignty in Southeast Asia”./ Theory, Culture and Society. 2000, 17(4) Anderson Â., Imagined Communities, London: Verso, 1991 Conklin, Beth. 1997. Body paint, feathers and VCRs: aesthetics and authenticity in Amazonian Activism. / American Ethnologist 24 (4): 711-37 Kinnvall, C. and Jonsson, K. (eds) Globalization and Democratization in Asia: the Construction of Identity, London, Routledge. 2002 Sara Ahmed & Anne Marie Fortier, “Re-imagining Communities”/ International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2003, 6(3) Wendy Parkins, Protesting Like a Girl: embodiment, dissent and feminist agency / Feminist Theory, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2000) Zdzislaw M. Symbols, conflict and identity: essays in political anthropology, Albany: State university of New York Press, 1993 Zizek, Slavoj. “Neighbors and Other Monsters”, The Neighbor: Three Inquiries in Political Theology, Cambridge, Massachusetts: University of Chicago Press., 2006 Class 11. Class objective: trace the evolution of patriotism and ethnic nationalism in a globalizing world. Mini-lecture “The evolution of patriotism and nationalism in a globalizing world” discusses how categories of patriotism and Motherland evolution under globalization. Study the structure of patriotism and factors that influence patriotic feelings; types of patriotisms (national, cultural, religious), patriotic rituals (A.Malinkin). Seminar opens a discussion about is patriotism only good? Define patriotism against nationalism. Distinguish civic and ethnic nationalisms. Specifies patriotism and cosmopolitism relationship. Consider under which conditions can patriot criticize his government or country? (P.Chaadaev case) Mandatory reading: ***Hopper P., Globalization and cosmopolitanism // Living with Globalization, N.Y., Berg, 2006, pp.61-76 ***Smith A. “Civic and Ethnic Nationalism”; Billig M., “Banal Nationalism”, Nations and nationalism. A reader. P. Spenser and H. Wollman (eds). Edinburgh Univ. Press, 2005 Recommended reading: Appadurai A., “Patriotism and its futures”, Modernity at Large, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996 Daniel Miller, (ed.) Worlds Apart: Modernity through the Prism of the Local, London: Routledge, 1995 Edgardo Lander, Eurocentrism, Modern Knowledges, and the “Natural” Order of Global Capital, Nepantla: Views from South 3.2, 2002. Hobsbawm, E.J. Nations and nationalism since 1780, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992 Lane, Jan-Erik; Ersson, Svante. Culture and politics: a comparative approach, Ashgate Publ. Ltd. 2005 / Chapter III. Ethnicity, p.73-101. Nussbaum, M.C., “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism”, M.C.Nussbaum, For Love of Country, Boston, Beacon, pp.2-17 Spencer P. and Wollman H. “Good and Bad Nationalisms”, p.177-217 Nations and nationalism. A reader. Ed. by P.Spenser and H.Wollman. Edinburgh Univ. Press, 2005. Stuart Hall, Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity, in D.Morley and K.H. Chen (eds), Stuart Hall, Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, London and New York: Routledge, 1996.
Class 12. Class objective:study multicultural policies Mini-lecture brings us to an actual topic of multicultural policies and we should trace the evolution from monoculture homogenous nation-states towards multiculturalism as an adopted official policy in US, UK, Sweden etc. We should make ethnic policies cross country comparative historical overview; Study models of monocultural nation-states (old Europe), “Melting Pot” and "a tossed salad"(USA), “biculturalism” (Canada), ethnic selection and “cultural integration” (Australia), multiculturalism in Africa, India etc.. Specific government multicultural policies shell be examined as well as legal non-descrimination norms (EU law). Seminarfocuses on the origins and peaceful coexistence of ethnicities in Russian Federation, EU and other formations. The problem of national minorities and refugee is also raised. Case study Mandatory reading: *** Lane, Jan-Erik; Ersson, Svante. Culture and politics: a comparative approach, Ashgate Publ. Ltd. 2005, pp.313-323 Recommended reading: Borneman J. Subversions of international order: studies in the political anthropology of culture. Albany: State university of New York Press, 1998 Frost, Catherine, Morality and Nationalism, Routhledge, 2006, p.154-168 Handler, Richard. Nationalism and the politics of culture in Quebec. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988 Kivisto, P. Multiculturalism in a Global Society, Oxford, Blackwell. 2002 Prem Kumar Rajaram, Humanitarianism and Representations of the Refugee / Journal of Refugee Studies, Vol. 15, No. 3 Smith A. Nations in decline, Pp. 17-30; Tiryakian E., When is the Nation no longer? Pp.55 – 70; both in Nationalism in a Global Era., Ed. by M. Young, Routledge, 2007 Zheng, Y., Globalization and State Transformation in China, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004 Zizek, Slavoj. Multi-culturalism, or, the Cultural Logic of Multi-national Capitalism, London: New Left Review, 1997. Pp. 28–51
Class 13. Class objective: to examine post-multiculturalism in EU, America and Russia. Mini-lecture examines post-multiculturalism in EU, America and Russia. We reveal “the collapse of the consensus on multiculturalism in the world” point. According to some, the "cult of ethnicity", if pushed too far, may endanger the unity of society (A.Schlesinger). Other say that "culture" should not be used as an excuse for rolling back the women’s rights (S.Okin). Some emphasize preference for western enlightment values as universal values. There is also an idea that multiculturalism undermines national unity, hinderes social integration and cultural assimilation and leds to the fragmentation of society into several ethnic factions (so called “balkanization”). Seminar discusses introduced by some states policies for “social cohesion”, “integration”, and (sometimes) “assimilation” They are often a direct reversal of earlier multiculturalist policies, as they seek to assimilate immigrant minorities and restore a de facto monocultural society. We examine such assimulation policies effectivness. “Fish bowl”discussin on “Eurabia theory” (Bat Ye'or): (support or critisize it). Research Islam self-identification differences in USA, EU and Russia. The study of A.Dugin Eurasianism concept (pro & contra), Mandatory reading: *** Ozkirimli, Umut. Contemporary debates on Nationalism, Palgrave, 2005, Pp. 113-125; 154-161 *** Laruelle, M. Aleksadr Dugin: A Russian Version of the European Radical Right? KENNAN INSTITUTE OCCASIONAL PAPER #294 (http://www.wilsoncenter.org/topics/pubs/OP294.pdf) Recommended reading: Andersen, J.G. and Bjorklund, T. “Radical Right-Wing Populism in Scandinavia: From Tax Revolt to Neo-liberalism and xenophobia”, P.Hainsworth (ed.), The Politic of the Extreme Right: from the Margins and the Mainstream, London, Pinter, pp.193-223, 2000 Angus Bancroft, Closed Spaces, Restricted Places: Marginalisation of Roma in Europe / Space & Polity, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2001. Ayse Caglar, Constraining metaphors and the transnationalisation of spaces in Berlin / Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2001. Eickelman, Dale F. & Jon W. Anderson (eds.) New Media in the Muslim World: The Emerging Public Sphere. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. Gellner E., Anthropology and politics: revolution in the sacred grove. Oxford; Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1995. Chapter: Anthropology and Europe. Pp. 230 - 240 James L. Watson, ed. Golden Arches East: McDonalds in East Asia, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997 Katherine Gibson, Lisa Law and Deirdre McKay, “Beyond Heroes and Victims: Filipina Contract Migrants, Economic Activism And Class Transformations” / International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2001 Liviu Popovicui and Mairtin Mac an Ghaill, Racisms, Ethnicities and British Nation-Making, in Fiona Devine and Mary Waters, Social Inequalities in Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. Riva Kastoryano, Race and Ethnicity in France, in Fiona Devine and Mary Waters, Social Inequalities in Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. Schlesinger, Jr. Arthur M., The Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society, rev. ed. NY, W. W. Norton & Company, 1998 Ye’or, Bat, Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, Madison, N.J., Fairleigh Dickinson University Press 2005
Class 14. Class Objective: to trace the evolution of Political Communication as a theoretical part of political sciences. Mini-lecture suggests the study of five critical approaches to contemporary Political communications: 1. Machiavellian - power relationships; 2. Iconic – “symbols are important; 3.Ritualistic - Redundant and superficial nature of political acts - manipulation of symbols; 4.Confirmation - political aspects looked at as people we endorse; 5.Dramatistic - politics is symbolically constructed. Seminar discusses K.Burke’s book Language as Symbolic Action (1966), where Burke defined humankind as a “symbol using animal”. This definition of man, he argued, means that “reality” has actually “been built up for us through nothing but our symbol system”. Mandatory reading: Chesebro, J.A Century of Transformation: Studies in the Honor of the 100th Anniversary of the ECA. Oxford University Press, 2009. Recommended reading: Burke, K. Dramatism and Development. Barre, MA: Clark University Press.1972. Denton R.E., Woodward G.C. Political Communication in America, New York: Praeger, 1998. Dyczok, M., Gaman-Golutvina, O. (eds). (2009). Media, Democracy and Freedom: The Post-Communist Experience, Peter Lang Publishing, Bern. Dumitrescu. D.Know Me, Love Me, Fear Me: The Anatomy of Candidate Poster Designs in the 2007 French Legislative Elections // Political Communication, 1091-7675, Volume 27, Issue 1, 2010, Pp. 20 – 43 McNair B. An Introduction to Political Communication, London: Routledge, 2003 Class 15. Class Objective: study “securitization” as a concept in IR and Political Sciences Securitization in international relations is a concept connected with the Copenhagen School, a largely constructivist approach to international security. Mini-lecture explores Basic Components of a securitization act - Securitizing actor: an entity that makes the securitizing move/statement; Referent object: the object that is being threatened and needs to be protected; Audience: the target of the securitization act that needs to be persuaded and accept the issue as a security threat. Seminar focuses on The Copenhagen School of security studies, which origins in international relations theorist Barry Buzan's book People, States and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations, first published in 1983. The Copenhagen School places particular emphasis upon the social aspects of security. Theorists associated with the school include Barry Buzan, Ole Wæver and Jaap de Wilde. Many of the school's members worked at the Copenhagen Peace Research Institute. The most prominent critic of the Copenhagen School is Bill McSweeney. Mandatory reading: Buzan, B., Waever, O and de Wilde, Jaap. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998. Recommended reading: Baine, W. The Empire of Security and the Security of the People, Routledge. 2006. Buzan B, Acharya, A.. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Routledge. 2010. Hough, P. Understanding Global Security, Routledge. 2004. Petersson, B. National Self-Images and Regional Identities in Russia; Ashgate, Aldershot. 2001. Tsygankov, A. Whose World Order: Russia's Perception Of American Ideas After The Cold War, Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press. 2004. Class 16. Class Objective: Public Intellectuals and the narratives of reconciliation. Mini-lecture suggests analysis of Historical perspectives of evolution of the role of public intellectuals in the societyfrom the 18th century “Men of letters” towards the 19th century Nineteenth-century British usage as well as the Eastern intellectuals. We explore the Public intellectual life, relationship of intellectuals with academia, “right” and “left” intellectuals as well as pseudo-intellectuals. Seminar discusses the role of the intellectuals in The Dreyfus Affair. Mandatory reading: Castells, M.The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Northampton, Edward Edgar, 2004. Recommended reading: Bender, T., Intellect and Public Life, The John Hopkins University Press, 1993. Foucault, M. Politics, Philosophy, Culture. Interviews and other writings 1977-1984. N.Y. Routledge. 1988. Fuller, S. The Intellectual: The Positive Power of Negative Thinking, Icon. Kochetkova, I. 2009.The Myth of the Russian Intelligentsia: Old Intellectuals in the New Russia, Routledge, N.Y. 2005. Korobkov, A., Zaionchkovskaia, Z. ‘Brain Drain versus Brain Gain: The Russian Intellectual Migration Trends’ (conference paper), ISA's 49th Annual Convention, Bridging Multiple Divides, Hilton San Francisco, Mar 26, 2008. Posner, R. Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2002. Class 17. Class Objective: explore and define Cultural and Symbolic capitals Mini-lecture suggests study of cultural capital which refers to non-financial social assets, they may be educational or intellectual, which might promote social mobility beyond economic means. We analyze forms of knowledge, skills, education, and advantages that a person has, which give them a higher status in society. E.q. parents provide their children with cultural capital by transmitting the attitudes and knowledge needed to succeed in the current educational and political systems. Seminar discusses symbolic capital can be referred to as the resources available to an individual on the basis of honor, prestige or recognition, and functions as an authoritative embodiment of cultural value. A war hero, for example, may have symbolic capital in the context of running for political office. The concept was coined by Pierre Bourdieu. Mandatory reading: Calhoun, Craig (ed) Dictionary of the Social Sciences (Article: Symbolic Capital), Oxford University Press, 2002 Recommended reading: Bourdieu,Pierre and Jean Claude Passeron, Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, Sage Publications. 1990. De Graaf, N., De Graaf, P., & Kraaykamp, G., “Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: a refinement of the cultural capital perspective” in Sociology of Education, v.73, i.2, pp.92–11. 2000. Dolby, N., “Race, National, State: Multiculturalism in Australia” in Arena Magazine, v.45, pp.48–51. 2000. Dumais, S., “Cultural Capital, Gender, and School Success: the role of habitus” in Sociology of Education, v.75, i.1, pp.44–68. 2002. Emirbayer, M., & Williams, E., “Bourdieu and Social Work” in Social Service Review, v.79, i.4 p689-725. 2005. Emmison, M., & Frow, J., “Information Technology as Cultural Capital” in Australian Universities Review, Issue 1/1998, p.41-45. 1998. Class 18. Class Objective: to reveal the concept of a narrative and collective memory as technique of construction of political myths. Mini-lecture suggests the study of the narratives of belonging and separation and political myths.In partucular we examine social constructivism as school in theory of nationalism studies, routed in French postmodernism and P.Bourdieu, represented by B. Andersons and E.Hobsbawm. We also their constructive critique from E.Balibar and I.Wallerstein. In the end we look at Russian critics of essentialism in nationalism studies (V.Tishkov, V.Voronkov, A.Osipov etc.). The Seminar suggests studying B. Flyvbjerg paper on “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study” as well as modern manipulative techniques used by Mass Media to construct political myth and legitimize political action. Case study: “Danish cartoons” Mandatory reading: ***Anderson Â., “Memory and Forgetting”, Imagined Communities, London: Verso, 1991.pp.187-206 Recommended reading: Balibar, E. ‘‘Racism and crisis’, in Balibar, E. and Wallerstein, I. Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities (London: Verso), 1991 Bauman, Z., The Individualized Society, Cambridge, Polity, 2001. Brubaker, R. “Myth and Misconceptions in the Study of Nationalism”, J.A.Hall (ed.), The State of the Nation, Cambridge University Press, pp. 272-306, 1998 Chomsky N., World Orders, Old and New, London, Pluto, 1994 Flyvbjerg B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study” In Qualitative inquiry, Vol.12, ¹2. Aalborg University, Denmark. pp. 219-243 Guerrina, R. Europe: History, Ideas and Ideologies, London, Arnold, 2002. Heer, J. and Penfold, S. “The Resilince of Regional Identity: Misunderstanding McDonaldization”, Responsive Community, 13, 3, pp.6-11, 2003 Hobsbawm, E.J. Nations and nationalism since 1780, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992 Hopper P. Understanding Cultural Globalization, Cambridge, Polity, 2007 Huntington, S.P. Who Are We? America’s Great Debate, New York, The Free Press. 2004 Nye J.S. and J.D. Donahue (eds), Governance in a Globalising World, Washington DC, Brookings Institution Press, pp.109-234 Ougaard, M. and Higgott, R. Towards a Global Polity, London, Routledge. 2002 Stiglitz, J.E. “Globalization and Development”, D.Held and M.Koenig-Archibugi (eds), Taming Globalization, Cambridge, Polity, pp.47-67, 2003. Utry, J. Global Complexity, Cambridge, Polity, 2002 Wallerstein, I., The Decline of American Power, New York, The New Press, 2003 Yang, M.M., “Mass Media and Transnational Subjectivity in Shanghai: Notes on (Re) Cosmopolitanism in Chinese Metropolos”, J.Xavier Inda and R.Rosaldo (eds.), The Anthropology of Globalization: A Reader, Oxford, Blackwell, 2002
Class 19. Class Objective: study the phenomena of cultural creolization and “Planète métisse”. Mini-lecture aims to look at the phenomena ofcreolization and cultural diversity, specify the differences between “cultural hybridity” “syncretism”, “diffusion”, “creolization” and “transnationalism” categories. Look at creolization as a displacement and mutual influence between several groups, creating an ongoing dynamic interchange of symbols and practices where “dislocation,” “fuzzy boundaries,” and “intergroup cross-fertilization” are becoming key characteristics of a cultural process. We address the problem of fixed criteria of Creoles membership regarding a particular aspect of colonialism. The Seminar suggest the analysis of the principle features of Creoles, like fluidity and openness of self-identification, tolerant attitude to intermarriage, the notion of cultural mixing or impurity, the notion of individualism. Study creolization as a “positive version of acculturation”. Mandatory reading: ***Eriksen T.H. 2007 “Creolization in Anthropological Theory and in Mauritius” In Creolization: History, Ethnography, Theory. ed. by Ch. Stewart, pp. 154-177 Recommended reading: Axford, B. and Huggins, R. “Towards a Post-National Polity: The Emergence of the Network Society in Europe”, D.Smith and S.Wright (eds), Whose Europe?, Oxford, Blackwell, pp.173-206, 1999 Brasseaux, Carl A. French, Cajun, Creole, Houma: A Primer on Francophone Louisiana, Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press. 2005 Castles, S., Ethnicity and Globalization, London, Sage, 2000 Cohen, R., Global Diasporas, London, Routledge. 1997 Habermas, J. “The European Nation-State and the Pressures of Globalization”, New Left Review, 235, pp.46-59 Khagram, S., Riker, J.V. and Sikkink, K. (eds), Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2002 Pieterse J.N. Globalization and culture, Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield, 2004 Robertson R., Globalization, London, Sage, 1992 Verges, Francoise. “Vertigo and Emancipation, Creole Cosmopolitanism and Cultural Politics”, pp. 169-183, S.Lash, M.Featherstone (eds), Theory, Culture & Society, Sages Pub., 2002 Werbner, P. and Modood, T. (eds), Debating Cultural Hybridity: Multi-Cultural Identities and the Politics of Anti-Racism, London, Zed, 1997 Wieviorka, M. “Racism in Europe: Unity and Diversity”. A.Rattansi and S.Westwood (eds). Racism, Modernity and Identity on the Western Front, Cambridge, Polity, pp.173-188, 1994 Scheffer, S. “Conceptions of Cosmopolitanism”, Utilitas, 11, 3, pp.255-276, 1999
Class 20. Class Objective: analyze the impact of globalization on the emergence of the transnational communities. Mini-lecture suggests to look at the globalization of the public sphere and emergence of transnational communities of professionals, bureaucrat and labor migrants. We also plan to examine the transnational influence of non-government organizations like Amnesty International and Human Right Watch, Greenpeace, new world problems based social movements and solidarity beyond the state; transnational Diasporas. The Seminar proposes to look at the role of the global personalities (intellectuals) like J.-P.Sartre, C.Lévi-Strauss, M.Gandhi, K.Deutsch, M.Foucault, N.Chomsky, E.Said, G.Hofstede, R.Putnam, C.Geertz, B.Anderson, A.Macfarlane, I.Wallerstein, A.Appadurai, T.Eriksen and others in the formation of the transnational comminities and fonds, to talk about the symbolic capital and the role of the Nobel and other awards in its maintenance. Mandatory reading: *** Taras, Raymond // Metacultural presumptions of European Elites. Europe Old and New 2008, pp. 57-81. Recommended reading: Amin, A.,“Immigrants, Cosmopolitans and the Idea of Europe”, H.Wallacó (ed.) Interlocking Dimensions, of European Intergration, Basingstoke, Palgrave, pp.280-301, 2001. Anderson-Gold, S. Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights, University of Whales Press, Cardiff, 2001 Appadurai, A., Modernity at large, Minneapolis, Univ. of Minnesota Press Archibugi, D. and Held, D. (eds) Cosmopolitan Democracy, Cambridge, Polity, 1995 Bauman, Z., “The Cosmopolitan Perspective: Sociology in the Second Age of Modernity”, S.Vertovec and R.Cohen (eds), Conceiving Cosmopolitanism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002 Beck U. “The cosmopolitan Perspective: Sociology in the Second Age of Modernity”, S.Vertovec and R.Cohen (eds), Conceiving Cosmopolitanism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp.61-85, 2002 Berger, P.L., Huntington , S.P.(eds), Many Globalizations, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002 Colas, A. International Civil Society, Cambridge, Polity, 2002 Florini, A.M. (ed.) The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society, Washington DC, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2000 Heater, D. World Citizenship: Cosmopolitan Thinking and its Opponents, London, Continuum., 2002 Held, D. “Cosmopolitanism: Ideas, Realities and Deficits”, D.Held and A.McGrew (eds.), Governing Globalization, Cambridge, Polity, pp.305-324 Hopper, Paul. Gobalization, Cosmopolitanism and the European Union, Living with globalization, Berg, NY, 2006, pp.61-76 Keane, J. Global Civil Society? Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003 Keohame, R.O. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World, London, Routledge, 2002 Ougaard M. and R. Higgott (eds), Towards a Global Polity, London, Routledge, pp.145-165 Petras, J. and Veltmeyer, H., Globalization Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century, London Sassen S., New Global Classes; Implications for politics // The New Egalitarianism / ed. by A.Giddens and P. Diamond. Cambrige, Maldon: Polity Press, 2005, p.143-153 Smith J., Chatfirld C., Pagnucco R. (eds.) Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State, Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ. Press, 1997 Wolf, M., Why Globalization Works, New Heaven, Yale University Press, 2004 Xavier Inda, J. and Rosaldo, R. (eds.), The Anthropology of Globalization: A Reader, Oxford, Blackwell, 2002
Exam. Student’s portfolio presentations and evaluation / Oral question and answer Exam.
Date: 2016-01-03; view: 845
|