Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






This week: software

 

Software technology is getting more complicated. Developers have to cut through a jungle of computer languages, operating environments, and shifting standards to choose how they’ll create their software. It’s not an easy job. Software purchasers will have to live with the results for years to come. Which advances in software technology will prevail? Which ones will be just a flash in the pan?

 

I chose four well-known software developers and asked each to talk about current trends in software technology. Their comments reveal some common and diverse themes.

 

I began by asking them if they thought that software purchasers are getting what they need. What should developers be doing differently to give purchasers a better product?

Mary Evans: "In general, I think people are getting what they want – there are a lot of creative things being done with paint software, word processing, DTP (desk top publishing) systems, and the like. Do users want more? Of course! Users will always want more. The computer is an incredibly powerful tool, and any software that makes it easier, faster, more creative, or more cost-effective will inevitably be in demand. But I’m generally optimistic about the way things are going at the moment. I think most of the major software manufacturers are able to read the market quite well".

 

Gerry Harper: "I’m afraid, I completely agree with Mary. I just don’t think that software purchasers are getting the technical support they need. While the products are getting more and more complex, and more and more expensive, it seems that support is starting to be thought of as an additional business opportunity. More generally, I’ve thought for some time that applications are getting too big, and that they are trying to do too much. Yes, they are versatile and powerful, but they are also often overwhelming. I think what we need are simple little programs that are easy to understand and use, and that work together to accomplish more complex tasks".

 

Matt Andrews: "I really can’t agree with that. To imagine we can just go back to "simple little programs" just ignores the complex needs of many of today's software users. No, I’m sure that you can’t stop progress. Suppliers know what their customers want – they just can’t supply it quickly enough. I’ve studied the market very closely, and I’ve found that purchasers’ needs seem always to exceed the capability of the available software by a constant time-frame of about six to twelve months".

 

Bob Bolton. "I think users are getting what they want, provided that their needs fit the off-the-shelf application. Specialized software is usually so specific that it should be written in-house for businesses. Developers should add features that the customer needs, not what they think customers want. Some effort should be made to get feedback (îáðàòíàÿ ñâÿçü) from the users before making an upgrade so that the proper features are added".



 

_______________________

 

Note: a flash in the pan – a success that lasts only a short time and is not repeated

 

XIII. Which of the four speakers do you agree with and why? Use: I think....; to my mind...; as is known...; as far as I know; it is generally accepted that..., in my opinion.


Date: 2015-12-24; view: 1299


<== previous page | next page ==>
The British on Holiday | Reinicio de la Terapia Subcutánea
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2024 year. Copyright infringement or personal data (0.006 sec.)