Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






Problem under study, clarify possible techniques to be used in collecting data and may avoid

Steps that ensures maximum objectivity and consistency in researching a problem. A key

Element in scientific method is planning. When sociologists wish to learn more about human

Behavior, they do not simply walk out the door, or pick up the telephone, and begin asking

Questions. There are five basic steps in scientific method that researchers follow in developing

useful research. These are:

Defining the problem,

Reviewing the literature,

Formulating the hypothesis,

Selecting the research design and then collecting and analyzing data,

Developing the conclusion.

An actual example will illustrate the workings of scientific method. In the 1980s, people

 

in the United States became increasingly aware of the plight of the homeless in the nation's

 

urban centers. In the past the homeless were primarily older white males living as alcoholics

 

in «skid row» areas. However, today's homeless persons tend to be younger and include growing

 

numbers of families without any shelter.

 

Defining the problem. The first step in any sociological research project is to state as clearly

as possible what you hope to investigate. In beginning their work on homelessness, a team

 

of sociologists headed by David Snow considered the question of who the homeless are. The

 

researchers learned that the mass media presented the homeless primarily as menially ill. The

 

sociologists developed a researchable question: «How representative is the media image of

 

the homeless? » After that they developed an operational definition, i.e. an explanation of the

 

abstract concept «mental illness». They classified homeless persons as mentally ill «if they had

 

contact with one or more mental health agencies and were simultaneously diagnosed by the

 

agency personnel as having one or more mental health problems».

 

Reviewing the literature. By conducting a review of the literature, researchers refine the

problem under study, clarify possible techniques to be used in collecting data and may avoid

making unnecessary mistakes. When David Snow and his colleagues began considering

 

mental illness among the homeless, they turned to two types of literature. First, they

 

reviewed «popular» magazines such as «Time», «Newsweek» and « People» and found a

 

consistent image of the homeless as «street people* who had previously spent some time in

 

mental hospitals. Second, they examined the systematic studies done in Boston and New York

 

which indicated that homeless persons were usually found to have a diagnosable mental illness.

 

But were these studies representative of the homeless? Still further review showed that, when



 

the researchers focused on the homeless in general, the proportions of homeless persons found to

 

be mentally ill were much lower.

 

Formulating the hypothesis. After reviewing the earlier research concerning homeless the

 

researchers developed a guess about the relation-ship between mental illness and homelessness.

 

Such a speculative state­ment about the relationship between two or more factors is called

 

a hypothesis. A hypothesis essentially tells us what we are looking for in our research. In order


Date: 2015-12-24; view: 120


<== previous page | next page ==>
Q.1: What is the scientific term for each of the following…? | Associations or even friendships that inevitably develop or influence the conclusion of the study.
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2017 year. (0.006 sec.)