Preparation of test tasks used in the preparation SIW
Form of control
Assessment
Evaluation criteria
Preparation of test tasks
Very well
Consistent with the estimates:
A (4.0, 95-100%);
A- (3,67; 90-94%)
Tests contain not less than 20 questions. Delivered at the appointed time. The text-based content. Test tasks are formulated clearly, correctly, specifically. Similar and adequate answers. An algorithm answers. Correctly stated the correct answers.
Well
Consistent with the estimates:
B+ (3,33; 85-89%);
B (3,0; 80-84%)
B - or 2.67; 75-79%).
Tests contain not less than 20 questions. Delivered at the appointed time. The text-based content. Test tasks are formulated clearly, correctly, specifically. Readnotify answers. An algorithm answers. Correctly stated the correct answers.
Satisfactory
Consistent with the estimates:
+ (2,33; 70-74%)
With (2,0; 65-69%)
With- (1,67; 60-64%)
D+ (1,33; 50-54%)
Tests contain not less than 20 questions. Delivered at the appointed time. The text-based desterately. There are tests that are not clear, incorrect, vague. Readnotify answers. An algorithm answers. Not all the correct answers marked correct.
Unsatisfactory
Corresponds to the estimate:
F (1,0; 0-49%)
Tests contain not less than 20 questions. Hollow base text, fuzzy question. Readnotify answers. There is no algorithm answers. Improperly marked more than 50% of correct answers.
Form of control
Assessment
Evaluation criteria
Preparation and defense of abstract
Very well
Consistent with the estimates:
A (4.0, 95-100%);
A- (3,67; 90-94%)
Put in the case, if a student in the defense of the essay and the report did not make any errors, inaccuracies. Versed in the theories, concepts and directions on the subject and gives them a rating, uses scientific achievements. The text was typed on a computer, a Glossary has been compiled on the subject, the content and design meets the requirements for writing an essay, the literature is sufficient.
Well
Consistent with the estimates:
B+ (3,33; 85-89%);
B (3,0; 80-84%)
B - or 2.67; 75-79%).
Put in the case, if a student in the abstract is not made serious errors were made unimportant inaccuracies or fundamental errors corrected by the student, managed to arrange the material with the help of the teacher. The text was typed on a computer, a Glossary has been compiled on the subject, the content and design have minor errors. Used literature in sufficient volume.
Satisfactory
Consistent with the estimates:
+ (2,33; 70-74%)
With (2,0; 65-69%)
With- (1,67; 60-64%)
D+ (1,33; 50-54%)
Is the case if the student while protecting admitted inaccuracies and unprincipled errors were limited to educational literature indicated by the lecturer, had great difficulty in systematizing material. Content and design are significant observations. The text presented in the manuscript version. The content of the abstract does not fully disclose the subject. Sources of literatures in small quantities. Used ready-made materials from the Internet.
Unsatisfactory
F (1,0; 0-49%)
Put in case a student at the defense made a fundamental error has not worked for the major literature on the subject of SIW, not able to use scientific terminology in the discipline, meets with rough stylistic and logical errors. Used ready-made materials from the Internet.The topic is not fully disclosed. Source literature in small quantities and the SIW do not put in the time.
Form of control
Assessment
Evaluation criteria
Presentation
Very well
Consistent with the estimates:
A (4.0, 95-100%);
A- (3,67; 90-94%)
Put in case the student during the presentation did not make any errors, inaccuracies. Versed in the theories, concepts and directions on the subject and gives them a rating, uses scientific achievements. The content and design meets the requirements to run the presentation. The number of slides on the topic of not less than 15.
Well
Consistent with the estimates:
B+ (3,33; 85-89%);
B (3,0; 80-84%)
B - or 2.67; 75-79%).
Put in case the student during the presentation is not made serious errors were made unimportant inaccuracies or prinjali errors corrected by the student, managed to arrange the material with the help of the teacher. The contents and design of the presentation there is a minor error. . The number of slides on the topic of not less than 15.
Satisfactory
Consistent with the estimates:
+ (2,33; 70-74%)
With (2,0; 65-69%)
With- (1,67; 60-64%)
D+ (1,33; 50-54%)
Put in case the student during the presentation was made inaccuracies and unprincipled errors were limited to educational literature indicated by the lecturer, had great difficulty in systematizing material. The contents and design of the presentation there were significant comments. The content of the presentation does not fully correspond to the selected topic. The contents and design of the presentation there is a significant error. The number of slides on the topic of not less than 15.
Unsatisfactory
F (1,0; 0-49%)
Put in case the student during the presentation made a fundamental error, is not able to use the scientific terminology of the discipline reports with logical errors. The content of the presentation does not fully correspond to the selected topic. The contents and design of the presentation is available gross errors. The number of slides on the topic of less than 15.
• The SIW is estimated full coverage of the content of a given topic.
