Jesus Mandela Christ – liberator or annihilator of South Africa?

The South African history we learn in our schools and from the media is nothing more than propaganda and lies. We learn that Nelson Mandela was arrested for criticising the apartheid regime.

What we don’t learn is that Mandela used to be a terrorist leader and gave personal orders to execute a bombing attack against the old apartheid regime. This is the reason why he was arrested in the first place.

Nelson Mandela’s Guerrilla activities

In 1961, Mandela became the leader of the ANC's armed wing, Umkhonto we Sizwe (translated as Spear of the Nation, also abbreviated as MK), which he co-founded. He coordinated a sabotage campaign against military and government targets, and made plans for a possible guerrilla war if sabotage failed to end apartheid. A few decades later, MK did wage a guerrilla war against the regime, especially during the 1980s, in which many civilians were killed. Mandela also raised funds for MK abroad, and arranged for paramilitary training, visiting various African governments.

Currently, South Africa is rapidly turning into an ungovernable anarchy due to cultural Marxist ANC rule. According to verifiable sources [1] more than 3085 European-Africans or so called Afrikaners/Boers have been killed since the ANC seized power in what is developing into a genocide of Europeans. 3085 confirmed murders means that the un-official number is likely around 10 000 murdered Europeans in Africa. Reports also indicate that European-African women are being raped and persecuted in other ways.

The black Africans have since the ANC resumed power doubled their population from 22 to 44 million (through liberal immigration and higher birth rates) while the European Africans have experienced horrendous atrocities resulting in the ongoing mass exodus we see today. All this because Nelson Mandela and the cultural Marxist regime of the ANC.

At least humanists and Marxist in Europe can sleep well at night knowing that apartheid is gone. Because after all, it’s better that every South African suffers and loses hope in the future than keeping in place discriminating policies right?

I consider both the former apartheid policies and the current situation as intolerable scenarios. However, considering the fact that I am a creature of logic and pragmatism the lesser evil is always the best alternative which is why we know should be done. The apartheid system was put in place to regulate the multicultural society and manifested itself through what would resemble the salad bowl that is Los Angeles with segregated communities. The difference is that the Europeans treated the Africans as second class citizens. Instead of attempting to co-exist within the borders of the same nation they should have just divided the country in half to begin with. The apartheid system was a racist multicultural system and should not be copied. Instead a policy of “Balkanisation” must be sought where the country is divided in two or more parts and given their own sovereignty.

Splitting the country in two does not in any way constitute apartheid (the ideology) but rather the creation of two sovereign nations. If this is not done as soon as possible the alternative will result in the finalisation of the European cultural and demographical genocide. As such, it is our moral duty to implement such policies; for the simple fact that it would be immoral not to.

This is an incredibly difficult choice as it goes against everything we have been taught under the European multicultural systems. However, we can’t ignore logic. Offending people is in a whole different league than indirectly allowing genocide. It is a lesser evil to be contributing to separation than it is to facilitate and contribute to large scale murders, systematical rapes and even genocide. When you are faced with two “evil” outcomes it is our duty to choose, support and implement the lesser of those two evils.

Date: 2015-12-17; view: 593