Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






Cross wiring multiple explosive devices vs. single load explosive device

 

Never try to cross wire multiple explosive devices unless it is an absolute requirement. Instead; always focus on single load explosive devices. To illustrate this we can review the 2010 Stockholm Jihadi suicide bombers fatal mistake. By cross wiring 5 pipe bombs he had increased the chance for failure by several hundred percent. With a single load explosive device the chance for failure is approximately 20%. As you attempt to cross wire 5 of these devices you are increasing the chance for failure to 80-95%. Needless to say; this is an unacceptable risk.

 

 

Common explosives which are available in large quantities: 500 kg +

 

 

Chemical Availability and accessibility Ease of use in bomb making Economy of bomb making History of prior use Overall potential use
Ammonium Nitrate (c) High High High High High
Sodium Chlorate Medium High Medium High Medium
Urea (d) High Low High High Medium
Nitric acid (d) High Very low High High Medium
Potassium Chlorate Very low High High Low Medium
Potassium Nitrate Low High Low Low Low
Potassium Perchlorate Very Low High Low Low Low
Hydrogen Peroxide (d, e) Low Medium Low Low Low
Calcium Nitrate mixtures (f) Medium High Low Very Low Low
Sodium Hypochlorite (e) Low Medium High Very Low Low
Calcium Carbide Low High Medium Very Low Low
Dinitrotoluene Medium High Very Low Very Low Low
Nitrobenzene Medium Medium Low Low Low
Nitroparaffins (c,g) Very Low Medium Very Low Low Very Low
Picric Acid Very Low High Very Low Very Low Very Low
Potassium Permanganate Very Low High Very Low Very Low Very Low
Sodium Chlorite Very Low High Very Low Very Low Very Low
Active Halogen biocides (c) Low Low Very Low Very Low Very Low
Calcium Hypochlorite Low High Very Low Very Low Very Low

 

 

aAssessment of affordability based on costs of material from chemical supply houses (except for active halogen-type biocides, as indicated by footnote c).

b As determined by the committee based on its experience and information provided by Richard Strobel, ATF, in a personal communication, September 11, 1997.

c Available from garden, swimming pool, and racing supply outlets.

d Precursor requiring chemical reaction for conversion to an explosive.

e Typically available as aqueous solution.

f Ca(NO3)2/NaNO3/NH4Cl/Calcium cyanamide.

g Includes nitromethane.

 

 

The above overview obviously does not consider the approach of using “alternative” easily accessible bulk explosives loads such as LNG platforms, LNG tankers, propane trucks etc. In these cases, you would only be required to create a booster charge of 50-100 kg as the bulk of the explosives would be the civilian vessel itself.



 

 

Alternative explosives – quick overview

 


Date: 2015-12-17; view: 704


<== previous page | next page ==>
Building the containers/skeleton | Material: mixture of tetrachloride and aluminum N/A
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2024 year. Copyright infringement or personal data (0.008 sec.)