Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






An S-corporation is not always best.

It is generally believed that small companies should incorporate as S-corporations. While an S-corporation enjoys many corporate attributes (the main is that the owners of a corporation do not expose their personal assets to corporate liability), it is treated like a partnership for purposes of determining its Federal income tax liability. At the end of each fiscal year, its total earnings (or losses) are prorated to each shareholder, and these earnings (or losses) are incorporated into their individual income tax returns.

Among the advantages of the S-corporation for small business is no “double taxation” – paying an income tax on corporate net income, and then paying an individual income tax on the dividend income subsequently distributed by the corporation.

Thus, an S-corporation “generally will not be liable for federal income tax.” If losses are incurred during the start-up period (or any other period), these losses can be deducted each year from the shareholders’ tax returns. All income, losses, credits, and deductions are “washed through” the S-corporation at the end of each fiscal year and carried directly to the individual tax return for each shareholder. Being emptied out at the end of each fiscal year, the S-corporation has no retained earnings account.

For most of small businesses, the S-corporation has long been the preferred corporate structure. The operational accounting is simpler, and accounting, legal, and administrative expenses are minimized. Shareholders receive the immediate benefits of earnings without “double taxation”, and the shelter of tax deductive losses on their individual tax returns. There are sound reasons to state that this is generally the most popular corporate structure.

However, for small businesses that are growing rapidly, the conventional C-corporation status may turn out to be more preferable. The primary motivation for such a change would be the ability to retain and reinvest earnings in the expanding business.

The maximum Federal income tax rate for C-corporation is 34 percent for taxable income up to $10 million, whereas the maximum tax rate on S-corporation income is now the maximum individual rate of 39.6 percent. At the other end of the range, the Federal tax on corporate income of $100,000 is $22,250 for a C-corporation, whereas the incremental tax on this income added to other income of the shareholder in an S-corporation could be as high as $39,600 if the shareholders are already in the maximum tax bracket. If the business is striving to retain and reinvest all possible cash during a period of strong growth, it will obviously forgo distributing cash dividends thereby avoiding the problem of“double taxation.”

The maximum tax will be effectively reduced by more than 16 percent, and substantial funds will then be retained to meet the capital needs of the expanding enterprise. Discounting the effects of depreciation charges, this shift of corporate structure yields an almost 10 percent increase in net cash flow.



Task 1. Answer the following questions:

1. What types of corporations are described?

2. What is the maximum corporation tax rate for taxable income up to $10.0 million?

3. What is the main advantage of the S-corporation status?

4. What does the term “double taxation” mean?

5. In what case is the C-corporation status more preferable than the S-corporation status?

 

Task 2. Substitute the following definitions with the words below:

unlimited liability,legal entity, partnership, limited liability, sole proprietorship.

1. non-incorporated business with unlimited liability owned by one person who may or may not have employees.

2. non-incorporated business formed by the association of two or more persons (but not more than twenty) who share risks and profits according to a partnership agreement.

3. party that may make contracts, carry out businesses, own property, employ people and is capable of suing and being sued for the breach of contract.

4. legal law according to which shareholders are responsible for the company's debt only to the amount unpaid on their shares.

5. legal law according to which owners are responsible for com­pany's debt to the full extent of their fortune.

 


Date: 2015-12-11; view: 982


<== previous page | next page ==>
Sample of a Letter of Order | Task 2. You are an Order processor for Office Universe Limited, a London-based stationery and office equipment company. A customer rings with a problem over an invoice.
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2024 year. Copyright infringement or personal data (0.007 sec.)