Russia Accuses Britain of Spying

An espionage scandal redolent of the cold war unfolded here today after Russia accused four British diplomats of spying and linked some of their activities to financing oprominent private organizations, including the Eurasia Foundation and the Moscow Helsinki Group.

A grainy, black-and-white video - broadcast on state television on Sunday night and shown repeatedly again today - purported to show a British diplomat picking up a rock that was said to conceal a communications device used to download and transmit classified information through hand­held computers. The rock, the size of a watermelon and able to transmit and receive data at distances of more than 60 feet, was seized near Moscow, prompting a search across the city for similar devices, Sergei Ignatchenko, the chief spokesman for Russia's intelligence agency, the Federal Security Service, told Russian reporters. A second device was found, but "the British intelligence service managed to retrieve one of the gadgets," he said.

The programme said four officials from the UK embassy and one Russian citizen, allegedly recruited by the British secret service, downloaded classified data from a transmitter in the rock onto palm-top computers. Hidden camera footage appears to show individuals walking up to the rock. One man is caught on camera carrying it away. A Russian citizen has been arrested for complicity, but another spokesman, Nikolai Zakharov, declined to say when he had been taken into custody and whether he had been formally charged. Mr. Zakharov would say only that the spy ring had been discovered and broken up at the beginning of winter. The fate of the British diplomats - identified as middle-ranking secretaries in the embassy - remained unclear. Mr. Ignatchenko said their potential expulsion would be determined "at the political level."

The scandal, one of the most serious in years, threatened to raise diplomatic tensions, even as Russia assumed the presidency of the G-8 group of industrialized nations, which includes Britain. Mr. Ignatchenko accused Britain of violating an agreement in 1994 to end espionage in Russia. "In fact," he said, "we have been deceived." Prime Minister Tony Blair, answering questions at a news conference in London, declined to comment. "I'm afraid you are going to get the old stock-in-trade: 'We never comment on security matters' -except when we want to, obviously," Mr. Blair replied."I think the less said about that, the better," he added. The nature of the espionage was shrouded in secrecy, but the link to private organizations came amid a politically charged campaign against charities and advocacy groups here, many of them financed by the United States and European countries to promote such things as democracy and independent media. Earlier this month President Vladimir Putin signed into law new legal restrictions on such groups that critics have said could be used to exert new pressure on those critical of Russian policies. But the relation between the espionage charges and the organizations appeared tangential.

Mr. Zakharov said in a telephone interview that one of the diplomats, identified as Marc Doe, a political secretary, approved grants distributed by the British government to Russian and international organizations, even as he was involved in covert activities."He gave money to them," Mr. Zakharov said, referring to the organizations. "That is all documented."

A spokesman for the British Embassy in Moscow declined to comment on the affair but cited a statement by the Foreign Office that said, "We are surprised and concerned by this allegation. We reject any allegations of any improper conduct in our dealings with Russian" private organizations, the statement went on. All of our assistance is given openly and aims to support the development of a healthy civil society in Russia." One of the groups supported by Britain and cited by officials was

the Eurasia Foundation, a nonprofit organization based in Washington that provides an array of grants across the former Soviet Union. Irina Akishina, director of the Moscow office, said in a telephone interview that the organization had received a grant worth about $105,000 in 2004 to promote independent newspapers in provincial Russian cities. She expressed bewilderment at the accusations, saying the television report, which appeared on the state's Rossiya channel with the cooperation of the Federal Security Service, was the first she heard of any questions surrounding her organization. She said the accusations reflected the government's growing hostility toward private organizations that operate independently of the Kremlin."We certainly do feel there is some danger," she said, referring to the new law on organizations like hers. "We do not understand at all why we were mentioned in this program. We are not involved in any illegal activities. "The Moscow Helsinki Group, also linked to the case, is one of the country's most prominent human-rights organizations and is often critical of the Kremlin.

Russia's intelligence chiefs have publicly warned about the threat of espionage from the West. The warnings have underscored a growing wariness in Russian intelligence and diplomatic circles about what is widely seen as foreign interference in domestic affairs, especially following American and European support for democratic movements in Ukraine, Georgia and other former Soviet republics. "Reconnaissance is not only waning," Nikolai Patrushev, the director of the Federal Security Service, said in an interview in the official state newspaper in November. "It is strengthening."

Last year counterintelligence agents had exposed 20 agents working for foreign governments and 65 foreigners working for secret services, he said in the interview. Earlier last year Mr. Patrushev singled out several non-governmental organizations, including the Peace Corps and the British charity Merlin, as fronts for foreign espionage. "Under the cover of implementing humanitarian and educational programs in Russia regions, they lobby for the interests of certain countries and gather classified information on a wide range of issues," he said of representatives of the private organizations. Mr. Patrushev's remarks, sharply criticized at the time by the American and British governments, nevertheless became a basis of the new law putting such organizations under greater scrutiny.

The latest scandal involved espionage of a more traditional sort, though with a high-tech twist. The fake rock was used as a dead drop, an agreed place for exchanging classified information or otherwise communicating with agents. Where exactly it was remained unclear, though the television report showed it on a sidewalk near what was identified as a park on the edge of Moscow. The hidden communication device allowed a Russian agent to transmit information in bursts lasting no more than a second or two, the officials said. The British operatives could then download the information with their own hand-held computers, the officials said, declining to discuss the nature of the information that the Russian provided to the British agents, or its significance.

British spy rocк'

Correspondent Mark Ward considers how such a rock might work, and the potential pitfalls of such technology.

Q: What kinds of devices could be used for this?

Any gadget that can swap data wirelessly would be able to work with the rock but the most likely candidates would be mobile phones and handheld computers - known as Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs). These are used very widely and it has become easy to use them to move data - be it a text message or an image or video clip - over short and long distances. To avoid looking suspicious, those involved in the alleged data theft might have turned to a widely available gadget because the basic data transfer capabilities would have been built in and it would need minimal tweaking to get working. Many phone and PDA users regularly swap data, such as contact details or images, via Bluetooth short-range radio or via infra-red.

Q: What capacity do such devices have? The latest devices can use wi-fi or even newer technologies to move data around faster. All can transfer many thousands of bytes of data per second. One byte is equal to one character and one million characters is roughly equivalent to the amount of data in a large paperback book.

Q: How would it work? Without more details it is hard to be precise about how a rock and phone/PDA combination might work. However, from what we know it appears that those who allegedly stole the confidential information walked close to the rock and then uploaded data to the device beneath it. Later, others came and downloaded the data and walked off with it. It is most likely that radio of some kind was used to pass data back and forth. Infra-red demands a line of sight between the devices swapping data and would not penetrate the fake surface of the rock. Many investigation firms use custom-built devices when trying to spot insurance fraud. Some have made "smart bricks" with cameras concealed in them which they toss into a suspect's garden. Typically these use short range radio to send images back to a van close by.

Q: What are the potential problems with this sort of thing? The main problem is likely to be the battery life for the device beneath the rock that stores the data. Sending data via short-range radio is a notorious gobbler of battery power. If lots of data were being passed back and forth the useful life of the rock could be very short.

Q: Are there any other problems, more specific to this situation? Yes. One is the speed at which data can be uploaded or downloaded. While standing in the street tapping on a phone or PDA does not raise much comment any more, it would if you had to stay in the same place for hours. But using faster speeds tends to be even more battery hungry. Another problem is ensuring that only the right people upload and download data. Unprotected wi-fi networks are notoriously easy to find and log on to. It might prove hard to find ways to continually update the alleged spies on regularly changing passwords, encryption keys and the like. The final problem is the clumsiness of this method for passing data. If a PDA has a wireless link there are likely to be lots of public places that would allow that data be sent more anonymously. For instance, many tech-savvy criminal gangs use hijacked servers to store stolen data.

Date: 2015-12-11; view: 889