Home Random Page


CATEGORIES:

BiologyChemistryConstructionCultureEcologyEconomyElectronicsFinanceGeographyHistoryInformaticsLawMathematicsMechanicsMedicineOtherPedagogyPhilosophyPhysicsPolicyPsychologySociologySportTourism






Draft International Convention on the Regulation, Oversight and Monitoring Of Private Military and Security Companies

13 July 2009

Final draft for distribution

 

The States Parties to the present Convention,

 

Reaffirming the Purposes and Principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, the erga omnes obligations related to the protection of human rights and the strict adherence to the principles of the sovereign equality of all States, the territorial integrity and political independence of every State, the right of self-determination of peoples, the prohibition of the threat or the use of force in international relations, the prohibition of propaganda for war and the prohibition of-interference into affairs which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any State,

 

Recalling the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, and the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,

Bearing in mind the universal principle of non discrimination contained in all international human rights instruments and the basic labor rights recognized in the ILO conventions,


Guided by the principles enunciated in the relevant resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly, in particular Resolution 2625 (XXV) of 24 October 1970 approving the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and Resolution 3314 (XXIX) of 14 December 1974 which defines Aggression as the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations,

Recalling the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility[1],

Recalling the United Nations Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials of 17 December 1979 and the Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials adopted by the Eight United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders in Havana in 1990,

Reaffirming the relevant rules of international humanitarian law, notably the Hague Regulations on Land Warfare of 1907, the Four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and the two Additional Protocols of 1977,

 

Recalling the Nuremberg indictment and Judgment, the ILC Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal (Nuremberg Principles of 1950), including the principle of personal liability for crimes, and the inadmissibility of the defense of State immunity or of superior orders,



 

Conscious of the international commitment to prevent impunity for war crimes and crimes against humanity, and affirming in this connection the principles contained in the Statute of Rome of the International Criminal Court

Bearing in mind other relevant international conventions, including the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict of 14 May 1954, and its two Protocols, and the 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, and other relevant principles concerning the protection of cultural property enshrined, inter alia, in the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and in the Washington Pact of 15 April 1935,

 

Concerned about the great dangers involved in the delegation or outsourcing of inherently governmental functions,

 

Reaffirming the current International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries of 4 December 1989,

 

Considering that responsibility for violations of human rights may be imputable not only to States but also to inter-governmental organizations and non-State actors, and that mechanism must be devised to ensure the accountability of States, inter-governmental organizations and non-State actors,

 

Bearing in mind the lack of a universal judicial mechanism to adjudicate on human rights violations, including those committed by non-state actors such as corporations, private companies and other entities, as well as by their employees and representatives, or to deal with activities designed to undermine any state's capacity to retain its monopoly on the use of force,

 

Recalling that it is the duty of every State to exercise its criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes,

 

Reaffirming the corporate responsibility to respect all human rights, and the necessity to establish a regime of accountability,

 

Aware of the United Nations Global Compact initiative for businesses that are committed to aligning their operations and strategies with ten universally accepted principles in the areas of human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption.

 

Determined to take all necessary measures to combat impunity by establishing jurisdiction and devising mechanisms to investigate reports of criminal activities and apprehend those individuals and entities involved in criminal activities, including senior officials of private military and security companies, with a view to their prosecution and punishment,

Emphasizing the responsibility to protect all persons, whether civilians or military personnel, from abuses of their human rights by the actions or omissions of non-State actors including private military and security companies,

 

Considering that the victims of violations of human rights committed by the personnel of private military and security companies, including killings, disappearances, torture, arbitrary detention, forced displacement, trafficking in persons, confiscation or destruction of private property, right to privacy, have the right to an effective remedy,

 

Further considering the necessity of ensuring the protection of human rights by all persons affected by the activities of private military and security companies, including civilians and the employees of these companies,

 

Noting the recruitment of the former military and police officers by private military and security companies to work in a range of activities in places of armed conflict, and further to provide a range of other services in conflict zones and in business activities such as mining,

 

Acknowledging the duty of all States to prevent human rights violations through legislative and other measures, the duty to investigate reports of violations and, where appropriate, prosecute and punish offenders as well as to provide adequate remedies to the victims,

 

Further acknowledging the duty of all States to prevent violations of human rights or other abuses committed by or involving transnational corporations and other business enterprises,

Being of the opinion that such protection cannot be effective unless appropriate national and international legislation is adopted and implementation mechanisms are developed so as to ensure enforcement,

 

Recalling the United Nations Non-Binding Guidelines on the Use of Military or Armed Escorts for Humanitarian Convoys of 14 September 2001,

Bearing in mind the Montreux Document of 17 September 2008,

 

Welcoming the adoption of codes of conduct, but considering that self-regulation of private military companies, private security companies, and hybrid companies providing both military and security services is not sufficient to ensure the observance of international humanitarian law and human rights law by the personnel of these companies,

 

Recognizing, however, that important gaps remain in the national and international legal regimes applicable to private military and security companies,

 

Considering the urgency of regulating the relationship between Member States and private military and security companies as well as the necessity to lay down minimum standards for the activities of such companies,

 

Have agreed as follows:

 

PART I. General Provisions

 

Article 1


Date: 2015-02-03; view: 1172


<== previous page | next page ==>
WHY SO MUCH VARIATION AMONG PUBLISHED OUTLOOKS? | Purpose
doclecture.net - lectures - 2014-2024 year. Copyright infringement or personal data (0.008 sec.)